Posted on 04/17/2014 10:58:59 AM PDT by jimbo123
When I see “Banderist” in someone’s post, I know what I’m going to get.
Soviet irredentists and revanchists appear to be welcome, as long as they claim to hate gays or George Soros.
Chamberlain landed at Heston Aerodrome on 30 September 1938, and spoke to the crowds there:
The settlement of the Czechoslovakian problem, which has now been achieved is, in my view, only the prelude to a larger settlement in which all Europe may find peace. This morning I had another talk with the German Chancellor, Herr Hitler, and here is the paper which bears his name upon it as well as mine. Some of you, perhaps, have already heard what it contains but I would just like to read it to you: ' ... We regard the agreement signed last night and the Anglo-German Naval Agreement as symbolic of the desire of our two peoples never to go to war with one another again.'[3]
Later that day he stood outside 10 Downing Street and again read from the document and concluded:
My good friends, for the second time in our history, a British Prime Minister has returned from Germany bringing peace with honour. I believe it is peace for our time. We thank you from the bottom of our hearts. Go home and get a nice quiet sleep.[3]
....so we send them a bunch of money and they keep doing anything they want?
And every other European country handed over its Jews to the Nazis, despite not having either (1) been victimized by Jews in the Soviet leadership and killed by the millions during the Holodomor or (2) set against the Jews through being targeted for extermination themselves as the Ukrainians were. If you want to punish a European country for crimes against Jews by making it a Russian province, that country should be Germany or Austria, not Ukraine. Heck, next to Germany, Russia is the country most responsible for the Holocaust - if the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact hadn't been signed, would Hitler have dared to start World War II, knowing that Germany faced huge armies from both the East and the West? Punish Russia, by helping to dismantle its still massive empire, instead of making it bigger by helping it to annex Ukraine.
Ah, some perfumed gentlemen gathered in a comfy room in Geneva and signed a piece of paper.
All will now be well.
1. I do not think Putin is negotiating in good faith.
2. I think events on the ground might slip out of control for both Kiev and Kremlin.
Yeah, that’s gonna work. Not!!
Thank you, yes, up to now, the Ukrainians have not stood up to Russian hooliganism. Russian hooligans will eventually force Ukraine to decide whether to stand up to them or to allow them to take over. They will not stop at the provinces with a majority of Russians, but will continue to provinces with any Russians, and will spread to other near Republics including NATO countries. If and when Ukrainians stand up to the Russian hooligans, there is no guarantee that the confrontation won’t escalate into violence, and that the violence won’t then lead to war. Russia can beat Ukraine, but could not be be sure of defeating Ukraine and Poland. Plus, commitment of Russia’s forces would open the Caucuses to Islamic jihadists, and enable the Sunnis to go on the offensive in Syria without fear of Russian reprisal. The deal represents a good bargain for Russia, in terms of Euros and Dollars coveted by Moscow. Russia’s military is not as large or as reliable as you might think. They have an interest in getting their agents and infiltrators under control.
Geneva meeting over Ukraine
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.