Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Revised SAT Won’t Include Obscure Vocabulary Words
New York Times ^ | April 16, 2014 | TAMAR LEWIN

Posted on 04/16/2014 5:18:01 AM PDT by reaganaut1

The College Board on Wednesday will release many details of its revised SAT, including sample questions and explanations of the research, goals and specifications behind them.

“We are committed to a clear and open SAT, and today is the first step in that commitment,” said Cyndie Schmeiser, the College Board’s chief of assessment, in a conference call on Monday, previewing the changes to be introduced in the spring of 2016.

She said the 211-page test specifications and supporting materials being shared publicly include “everything a student needs to know to walk into that test and not be surprised.”

The overall scoring will return to the old 1600 scales, based on a top score of 800 in reading and math.A New SAT Aims to Realign With SchoolworkMARCH 5, 2014 David Coleman is focusing on ways to encourage low-income students to go to select colleges.The Story Behind the SAT OverhaulMARCH 6, 2014 One big change is in the vocabulary questions, which will no longer include obscure words. Instead, the focus will be on what the College Board calls “high utility” words that appear in many contexts, in many disciplines — often with shifting meanings — and they will be tested in context. For example, a question based on a passage about an artist who “vacated” from a tradition of landscape painting, asks whether it would be better to substitute the word “evacuated,” “departed” or “retired,” or to leave the sentence unchanged. (The right answer is “departed.”)

The test will last three hours, with another 50 minutes for an optional essay in which students will be asked to analyze a text and how the author builds an argument.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: college; education; sat; words
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last
To: grania

It “disadvantages” students who don’t know as much as others, which is the point of the test.


41 posted on 04/16/2014 6:56:39 AM PDT by achilles2000 ("I'll agree to save the whales as long as we can deport the liberals")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: central_va

42 posted on 04/16/2014 6:58:55 AM PDT by xzins ( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not

Your comment was stultifying.


43 posted on 04/16/2014 7:02:31 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Tulane

Math is not math anymore. This is real.

“Colbert also highlighted a Common Core second grade problem that has become popular among parents on social media:

Mike saw 17 blue cars and 25 green cars at the toy store. How many cars did he see? Write a number sentence with a [grey box] for the missing number. Explain how the number sentence shows the problem.

“And there’s hard proof that the Common Core is already opening our children’s minds to new ways of thinking,” Colbert continued. “Just look at this actual answer to that question given by a California second-grader.”

17 + 25 = 42 I got the answer by talking in my brain and I agreed of the answer that my brain got.

“Folks, this child has a bright future,” quipped Colbert. “He’s only in second grade and can already clearly explain what it feels like to think. Now we just need to get him to explain what that feels like to whoever wrote the Common Core question.”


44 posted on 04/16/2014 7:04:27 AM PDT by freefdny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

¿Porque el examen no se escrita en espanol? ¡Racista!


45 posted on 04/16/2014 7:32:11 AM PDT by ViLaLuz (2 Chronicles 7:14)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Always A Marine

Sorry; that post is slightly above the 12 year old level. Can dial it back a bit?


46 posted on 04/16/2014 7:36:51 AM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: central_va
Your comment was stultifying.

Funny that you would say that, my three children echo that same complaint about me.

47 posted on 04/16/2014 7:37:49 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (For every Ted Cruz we send to DC, I can endure 2-3 "unviable" candidates that beat incumbents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: rstrahan

Your point of view is what’s wrong with education: we produce “graduates” that are juuuuust smart enough to do their tasks, but not so smart (or well informed, or disciplined with critical thinking skills) that they’ll start asking unwanted questions. A servile education, as opposed to what used to be the gold standard of liberal education.


48 posted on 04/16/2014 7:40:07 AM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Romulus
It's not just the SAT that's being dumbed down. I passed the CPA under the "old system", i.e. testing dates in May & November, multiple essay questions, etc.

Now, you can schedule the exam during every month, and from what I've heard, there are no essay questions.

It may have been harder for some, but those essay questions pulled me over the finish line. I had the same professor for over 30 hours of accounting, and he never used numbers...he only taught theory.

His tests (midterm and finals) were all essay, and out of the five questions he would ask, the first sentence of the answer to at least two questions would be "based on the information you've given me, I cannot answer the question." From there, you would have to discuss the accounting theory behind the problem.

49 posted on 04/16/2014 7:44:19 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (For every Ted Cruz we send to DC, I can endure 2-3 "unviable" candidates that beat incumbents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Romulus

As I recall, the application of the thought processes I honed during college (at a Jesuit university) did not endear me to several officers in my chain of command...lol!


50 posted on 04/16/2014 7:47:32 AM PDT by Night Hides Not (For every Ted Cruz we send to DC, I can endure 2-3 "unviable" candidates that beat incumbents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Always A Marine
I always thought the use of big words was to look and act superior to other people, not for the actual purpose of being smarter. Intelligence is and always be more about creativity than memorization.

Did it really matter if Einstein learned a ton of big words in school? Of course not, Einstein was himself because he invented things, not because he run circles around someone with words they couldn't understand.

51 posted on 04/16/2014 8:46:54 AM PDT by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Too late for a-chill-us.


52 posted on 04/16/2014 9:43:37 AM PDT by Rebelbase (Tagline: optional, printed after your name on post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Re: “Revised SAT Won’t Include Obscure Vocabulary Words”

Borborygmus!

(Audible sounds coming from your abdomen - they often begin the same moment you begin to take vocabulary tests)

53 posted on 04/16/2014 12:36:13 PM PDT by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson