Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: apillar

Sure makes sense to me.

To limit the amount a candidate can spend on his own campaign doesn’t seem legit—and if that’s the case, there shouldn’t be a limit to what one can contribute to other campaigns, either.


9 posted on 04/02/2014 7:31:37 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: All

Soros just opened his checkbook.


11 posted on 04/02/2014 7:34:57 AM PDT by newnhdad (Our new motto: USA, it was fun while it lasted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: 9YearLurker
To limit the amount a candidate can spend on his own campaign doesn’t seem legit—and if that’s the case, there shouldn’t be a limit to what one can contribute to other campaigns, either.

If this would have been in effect in 1996' Jack Kemp would have been President on Steve Forbes dime. Mr Forbes said he only ran because he couldn't give what he wanted to Jack....

12 posted on 04/02/2014 7:35:03 AM PDT by taildragger (The E-GOP won't know what hit them, The Party of Reagan is almost here, hang tight folks....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson