Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Climate Extremists Will Help Write the New Food Nutrition Guidelines
The Independent Sentinel ^ | March 10, 2014 | Sara Noble

Posted on 03/11/2014 8:41:24 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks

There is no area of our lives over which the government will not seek control. Take the latest example. Obama is reaching far beyond publishing new food nutrition guidelines or insisting on calorie counts in fast food restaurants, he is intent on allowing global warming alarmists and other extremist groups to co-opt them as well.

In an article entitled, “Obama administration pollutes guidelines for healthy eating with unhealthy ideologies,” published Sunday by the Washington Examiner, National Center Senior Fellow and Risk Analysis Division Director Jeff Stier says environmental activists within the U.S. government plan to change the nation’s dietary guidelines to promote foods that they believe have “a smaller carbon footprint.”

HHS and the USDA are meeting on the 14th and they are including guidelines that will include climate change activism which will negatively impact food stamps, military and school meals programs. It will be expensive and it will push a far-left wing agenda which includes ideas such as abandoning meat and dairy as much as possible.

Members of the committee are special interest groups who will for the first time have input into the guidelines.

Guidelines will now include “sustainability” as part of the agenda in drafting the guidelines. Other agenda items include “immigration,” “global climate change” and “agriculture/aquaculture sustainability.”

Food security is being used to advance an extreme and expensive left-wing agenda. Please read the article here.

Just the printing of the guidelines will be expensive to say nothing of the cost of food.

For one thing, climate extremists want to push people towards becoming vegetarians or better yet, strict vegans. None of this will affect climate in any way whatsoever.

Check out the Environmental Working Group’s Meat Eaters Guide and their bogus comparison of foods and car mileage:

(Excerpt) Read more at independentsentinel.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: climatechange; food; foodnazis; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax; health; nannystate; nutrtion; obesity
The table in the article doesn't specify what unit of each food they are talking about. Is it 1 pound of lamb, 1 leg of lamb, or what?

If that table is verbatim from the environmental working group, it cannot possibly be taken seriously.

1 posted on 03/11/2014 8:41:24 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SheLion; Eric Blair 2084; -YYZ-; 31R1O; 383rr; AFreeBird; AGreatPer; Alamo-Girl; Alia; altura; ...

Environ-MENTAL extremist Nanny State PING!


2 posted on 03/11/2014 8:41:48 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (The PASSING LANE is for PASSING, not DAWDLING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; alrea; America_Right; ...
DOOMAGE!

Global Warming PING!

You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.

Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.

Greener than “green”

Keystone Pipeline Protest Showcases Opposition’s Hypocrisy

Dems rip climate change skeptics in all-night gabfest

Global Warming on Free Republic

Latest from Global Warming News

Latest from Real Climate

Latest from Climate Depot

Latest from Greenie Watch

Latest from Junk Science

Latest from Terra Daily

3 posted on 03/11/2014 8:42:36 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (The PASSING LANE is for PASSING, not DAWDLING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Ping.


4 posted on 03/11/2014 8:43:47 PM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

This is not going to go well.


5 posted on 03/11/2014 8:44:21 PM PDT by doc1019
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Thanks for the ping.


6 posted on 03/11/2014 8:52:24 PM PDT by GOPJ (From a bellwether to an "oh-whateverrrr" in less than a single news cycle. -freeper Fightin Whitey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Come on now. It’s hard enough making up all those numbers, without also having to specify units!


7 posted on 03/11/2014 8:57:15 PM PDT by USFRIENDINVICTORIA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Potato skin broth for all!


8 posted on 03/11/2014 9:02:09 PM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USFRIENDINVICTORIA

I’m assuming they used unicorn farts.


9 posted on 03/11/2014 9:12:01 PM PDT by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Ever seen a healthy looking vegan or vegetarian? I know a few, they always look sick, seem to have numerous frequent health issues and take tons of pills to account for the loss of nutrients in meat and dairy,


10 posted on 03/11/2014 9:15:15 PM PDT by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Ever wonder how a country as big as China could be conquered and subjugated by a nation (Mongolia) with something like 1/100 its population? Diet had something to do with it...


11 posted on 03/11/2014 9:27:33 PM PDT by varmintman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


12 posted on 03/11/2014 9:41:19 PM PDT by Nachum (Obamacare: It's. The. Flaw.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Another Babel. Babel Food Pyramid

They can start by having their heroes, NFL NBA MB Teams impromptu menu verifications.

All another earthly Lucifer man possessed Babel. Babel Food Pyramid in a false attempt to reach heaven-immortality.

Inspired by Lucifer’s kingsdom, god of this world, the babels, to mock the image of Jehovah.


13 posted on 03/11/2014 9:55:07 PM PDT by Varsity Flight (Extortion-Care is the Government Work-Camp: Arbeitsziehungslager)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
No one is going to tell me what to eat!!!

As far as restaurants, we probably don't eat out more than 6 times a year.

14 posted on 03/11/2014 10:00:09 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

“I’m assuming they used unicorn farts.”

Those are outlawed, they destroy the ozone layer!


15 posted on 03/11/2014 10:01:25 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dalereed

Soylent Green anyone? :-)


16 posted on 03/11/2014 10:07:03 PM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

I can only imagine.

http://comicsbeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/zUerax.gif


17 posted on 03/11/2014 10:17:45 PM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
I see dead people.

"Scientific farming"....

The government deciding how much you need to eat....

Government control of food stocks and already yapping about "hoarders" (preppers).

Calorie counts...

Pyramid schemes....

Turning tables (into a formula, which is where they got the table in the first place).

Yep. With people who have proven that the only 'green" thing they are good at is pi$$ing away money, what could possibly go wrong?

18 posted on 03/11/2014 10:28:11 PM PDT by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
the U.S. government plan to change the nation’s dietary guidelines to promote foods that they believe have “a smaller carbon footprint.”

The Cliff Notes version of this policy is "Eat Dirt & Die!"

(Gaia is way overcrowded with all you little people, especially you Tea Party, Bitter Clinger, Red State types)

/s

19 posted on 03/11/2014 10:54:10 PM PDT by BwanaNdege
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
There is no area of our lives over which the government will not seek control.

That's "liberal' government... creepy control freaks...

20 posted on 03/12/2014 4:24:26 AM PDT by GOPJ (From a bellwether to an "oh-whateverrrr" in less than a single news cycle. -freeper Fightin Whitey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

On the new menu: Soylent Green.


21 posted on 03/12/2014 4:35:42 AM PDT by Rocky (The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those who speak it. George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

How many servings of arugula per day?


22 posted on 03/12/2014 5:13:07 AM PDT by Constitutionalist Conservative (I'm a constitutionalist, not a libertarian. Huge difference.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; Nachum

Control the food, control the people!


23 posted on 03/12/2014 6:21:05 AM PDT by Diana in Wisconsin (I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Thanks for the ping!


24 posted on 03/12/2014 7:50:54 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Rush was brilliantly clear on *climate change* today:

One of the other factors, independents, the precious — oh, we love them so much — independents made up 25% of the votes. Jolly won those, too. The Republican won the independents, and that’s what the consultants say you have to do. This is a moderate district, lot of snowbirds, a lot of transplanted moderates, liberals from the Northeast have moved and live there. That’s why the Democrats thought that their global warming spiel would work to counter the negatives of Obamacare.

You know what else? David Jolly was a lobbyist for offshore drilling. I mean, you can’t be a bigger target than that for a Democrat campaign. My God, this is everything. A lobbyist for offshore drilling! And not the Ted Kennedy kind. This is oil drilling that he’s a lobbyist for. Now, in the conventional wisdom playbook, that’s supposed to be a death warrant in a political campaign, and he didn’t lose. There was an anti-David Jolly editorial back in January, Tampa Bay Times. “ Both Jolly, a Republican candidate for US House District 13, and Lucas Overby, his Libertarian opponent, are refusing to acknowledge the overwhelming scientific evidence that humans have had an extensive impact on climate change and by extension, rising tides in Pinellas County and elsewhere.”

So, I mean, they laid it on full bore. That is just journalistic malpractice. Well, it’s an editorial, but whoever wrote it is a full-fledged idiot. Okay, so Jolly and the Libertarian refuse to acknowledge the overwhelming scientific evidence that humans have had. There is no such evidence!
There’s no evidence that humans — it’s an open question. If there was evidence humans had caused it, then there wouldn’t be a debate.

If there was evidence, you couldn’t refute it. There isn’t any evidence that humans cause the climate to change. Nobody’s disputing the climate changes. But we’re not causing it. We don’t have that power. We do not have the ability. And the proof is we can’t fix it. We can’t stop it once it’s doing one thing or the other, warming or cooling. We can’t stop it. So how can we cause it?

The other thing about this global warming, and I think this is a fundamental point, and admittedly it may be over the head of your average low-information voter. But for this global warming argument that the left makes to work, there has to be an unquestioned truth, or assumption, and that is that whatever was going on 10 years ago is normal and the way God intended or the way nature intended. At some point you have to be able to say, “This is the normal for planet Earth,” so that you can measure warming or cooling. There’s no evidence of what normal is. There hasn’t been record taking long enough for anybody to say what is normal. Are the ice ages normal? Are Dust Bowls normal?

We define normal based on our comfort. But is that what’s normal? We don’t know what the point is that if it’s getting cooler we got a problem, and if it’s getting warmer we’ve got a problem. We just assume that at the moment in time that we happen to populate the planet it happens to be normal. There’s so much wrong with that. Scientifically there’s so much wrong. You can refute practically every claim made because every claim is political. You can refute it with logic. So I think when you have an editorial like the Tampa Bay Times, it’s just a bit of evidence of how corrupt journalism school has become, how corrupt the left is. The overwhelming scientific evidence that man causes — there isn’t any evidence that man causes it.

There is an attempt to make people believe it with contrived evidence. That’s what the e-mails from the East Anglia University demonstrated, that the climate scientists are making it up. They are ignoring things that disprove their theory, and they’re making up things that prove their theory. There isn’t any science. The next thing that needs to be touted is, science is not consensus. Science is not up for a vote. It’s not a political contest to win. But that’s what it’s become. That’s why I asked the question: Why is whether it’s getting warmer or cooler political? That question alone to me ought to alert everybody that they’re being caught up in a hoax.

People intrinsically hate politics, don’t they? They hate lobbyists, they hate all of this. They like the goodies they get, but they don’t like it. They don’t think it’s honest. They think they get screwed. Why, then, do they choose to believe certain elements of the industry they all despise?

They don’t think politicians are honest; they don’t think politicians really care about ‘em. That’s another thing. Now, I’m making a detour here. I’ve leaving the Jolly race ‘cause a bulb went off in the brain. You know the exit poll question. There were two in the 2012 presidential race. When I saw the first wave at five o’clock, that’s when we got the first wave in 2012. When I saw them, I said, “We’re finished.”

The first one was that almost 58% of voters still blame Bush for the economy. I said, “Well, it’s over.” The second one, and even worse, was in the question, “cares for people like me,” Obama 81, Romney 19. And for the first time I think this is safe to say, in exit polling data, and not just exit polling, in terms of Election Day, but polling afterwards, what normally wins is whoever voters think is the most competent leader. That question, whoever prevails in that question generally has won the presidential election. This one, 2012 I think was one of the first — if not the first, it’s one of the few — where the empathy question defined the winner. And that signals a significant societal shift in what people want out of their president. “Cares about people like me.”

That is evidence of the corruption of our culture throughout education and entertainment, pop culture, “cares about people like me.” Well, the Republicans never win that one. Even Republicans that have been elected president always lose in that. And therein lies one of the biggest challenges the Republicans have, is convincing people they care about them. If you want to talk about Republican branding that’s gone wrong, that’s probably it in a nutshell, that Republicans don’t care about people. They care about the rich, and that no matter how incompetent the Democrats are, doesn’t matter, ‘cause they at least care.

And then that feeds into all of this equality and fairness and all these other things that really have nothing to do with leadership. But even that, the Democrats tried characterizing David Jolly as a pro-offshore drilling lobbyist and a global warming denier, he doesn’t care about you, and it didn’t work. So I’m telling you that there are all kinds of lessons for the Republican establishment, and the Tea Party, too. Anybody that wants to win elections in this cycle, there’s all kinds of lessons to be learned from this one.

The global warming thing, I don’t know why the Republicans haven’t been more vocal because, to me, it’s so easy to refute it. I know we have our scientists that are trying to refute it that way, and God bless them. But the people that support it don’t know the science. The people that support it are brain-dead. They’re caught up in the emotion of it. They are accepting blame for causing it.

And then they are accepting that carrot out there that they can be absolved for this sin if they agree to pay higher taxes and drive a clunky little car and whatever other price they have to pay, and give up some of their freedom. I mean, to me, it’s just so commonsensical. This is a farce, and that big question: How do we know what is normal? What kind of vanity do we have?

How many human beings have walked this earth over however many years it’s been here? Whatever you believe, where do we get off saying that in our 85 years of life expectancy is what’s normal for the earth and that’s the way it should be? We don’t know that. We don’t know that there even is a normal, because the climate of Planet Earth is in a state of constant flux.

So we’re gonna define “normal” by where we’re most comfortable? Well, I’m sorry, that doesn’t even work, ‘cause frankly we, down here, have had a very comfortable winter. It’s been fabulous. As far as we’re concerned, this could be normal all the time. And most of this country has frozen its behind off! There is no normal. There is no automatic, “This is the way it was intended to be.” We don’t know that.

So any so-called evidence that it’s getting warmer or cooler from that point is bogus. The whole thing is made up. Now they’re inculcating all of this with Michelle’s push into healthy foods, by determining how food is created, produced, grown, whatever. It’s gotta be done in a “green” fashion. That’s gonna raise prices. It’s ostensibly gonna be healthier and so forth.

But it’s just gonna end up taking away food choice from people, and it’s gonna raise prices like crazy. And it’s all based on the presumption you don’t know how to eat right; you don’t know what’s good for you. But it’s really based on more than that. They just want to control every aspect of your life, and it’s what they’re aiming for.

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2014/03/12/lessons_on_climate_change_for_the_republican_establishment


25 posted on 03/12/2014 5:34:41 PM PDT by Daffynition ("If you think you can do a thing or think you can't do a thing, you're right." ~ Henry Ford)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson