Skip to comments.Underwhelmed: Grading the New Tax Reform Plan
Posted on 02/28/2014 9:19:07 AM PST by Kaslin
To make fun of big efforts that produce small results, the famous Roman poet,Horace, wrote The mountains will be in labor, and a ridiculous mouse will be brought forth.
That line sums up my view of the new tax reform plan introduced by Congressman Dave Camp, Chairman of the House Ways & Means Committee.
To his credit, Congressman Camp put in a lot of work. But I cant help but wonder why he went through the time and trouble. To understand why Im so underwhelmed, lets first go back in time.
Back in 1995, tax reform was a hot issue. The House Majority Leader, Dick Armey, had proposed a flat tax. Congressman Billy Tauzin was pushing a version of a national sales tax. And there were several additional proposals jockeying for attention.
To make sense of this clutter, I wrote a paper for the Heritage Foundation that demonstrated how to grade the various proposals that had been proposed.
As you can see, I included obvious features such as low tax rates, simplicity,double taxation, and social engineering, but I also graded plans based on other features such as civil liberties, fairness, and downside risk.
There obviously have been many new plans since I wrote this paper, most notably the Fair Tax (a different version of a national sales tax than the Tauzin plan), Simpson-Bowles, the Ryan Roadmap, Domenici-Rivlin, the Heritage Foundations American Dream proposal, the Baucus-Hatch blank slate, and as noted above the new tax reform plan by Congressman Dave Camp.
Given his powerful position as head of the tax-writing committee, lets use the 1995 guide to assess the pros and cons of Congressman Camps plan.
Rates: The Top tax rate for individual taxpayers is reduced from 39.6 percent to 35 percent, which is a disappointingly modest step in the right direction. The corporate tax rate falls from 35 percent to 25 percent, whichis more praiseworthy, though Camp doesnt explain why small businesses (who file using the individual income tax) should pay higher rates than large companies.
Simplicity: Camp claims that he will eliminate 25 percent of the tax code, which certainly is welcome news since the internal revenue code hasswelled to 70,000-plus pages of loopholes, exemptions, deductions, credits, penalties, exclusions, preferences, and other distortions. And his proposal does eliminate some deductions, including the state and local tax deduction (which perversely rewards states with higher fiscal burdens).
Saving and Investment: Ever since Reagan slashed tax rates in the 1980s, the most anti-growth feature of the tax code is probably thepervasive double taxation of income that is saved and invested. Shockingly, the Camp plan worsens the tax treatment of capital, withhigher taxation of dividends and capital gainsand depreciation rules that are even more onerous than current law.
Social Engineering: Some of the worst distortions in the tax code are left in place, including the healthcare exclusion for almost all taxpayers. This means that people will continue to make economically irrational decisions solely to benefit from certain tax provisions.
Civil Liberties: The Camp plan does nothing to change the fact that the IRS has both the need and the power to collect massive amounts of private financial data from taxpayers. Nor does the proposal end the upside-down practice of making taxpayers prove their innocence in any dispute with the tax authorities.
Fairness: In a non-corrupt tax system, all income is taxed, but only one time. On this basis, the plan from the Ways & Means Chairman is difficult to assess. Loopholes are slightly reduced, but double taxation is worse, so its hard to say whether the system is more fair or less fair.
Risk: There is no value-added tax, which is a critically important feature of any tax reform plan. As such, there is no risk the Camp plan will become aTrojan Horse for a massive expansion in the fiscal burden.
Evasion: People are reluctant to comply with the tax system when rates are punitive and/or theres a perception of rampant unfairness. Its possible that the slightly lower statutory rates may improve incentives to obey the law, but that will be offset by the higher tax burden on saving and investment.
International Competitiveness: Reducing the corporate tax rate will help attract jobs and investment, and the plan also mitigates some of worst features of Americas worldwide tax regime.
Now that weve taken a broad look at the components of Congressman Camps plan, lets look at a modified version of my 1995 grades.
You can see why Im underwhelmed by his proposal.
Congressman Camps proposal may be an improvement over the status quo, but my main reaction is whats the point?
In other words, why go through months of hearings and set up all sorts of working groups, only to propose a timid plan?
Now, perhaps, readers will understand why Im rather pessimistic about achieving real tax reform.
We know the right policies to fix the tax code.
And we have ready-made plans such as the flat tax and national sales tax that would achieve the goals of tax reform.
Camps plan, by contrast, simply rearranges the deck chairs on the Titanic.
P.S. If you need to be cheered up after reading all this, heres some more IRS humor to brighten your day, including the IRS version of the quadratic formula, a new Obama 1040 form, a list of tax day tips from David Letterman, a cartoon ofhow GPS would work if operated by the IRS, an IRS-designed pencil sharpener, a sale on 1040-form toilet paper (a real product), and two songs about the tax agency (hereand here), and a PG-13 joke about a Rabbi and an IRS agent.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.