Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Live Thread: Enforcing the Presidentís Constitutional Duty to Faithfully Execute the Laws ^ | February 26, 2014 | Chairman

Posted on 02/26/2014 7:02:13 AM PST by Whenifhow

Witness Panel 1

The Honorable Jim Gerlach United States House of Representatives Gerlach Testimony.pdf (146.3 KBs) The Honorable Diane Black United States House of Representatives Black Testimony.pdf (305.2 KBs) The Honorable Tom Rice United States House of Representatives Rice Testimony.pdf (271.7 KBs) The Honorable Ron DeSantis United States House of Representatives DeSantis Testimony.pdf (315.3 KBs)

Witness Panel 2

Mr. Jonathan Turley George Washington University Law School Turley Testimony.pdf (338.6 KBs) Ms. Elizabeth Price Foley Florida International University College of Law Foley testimony.pdf (682.6 KBs) Mr. Christopher Schroeder Duke University Law School Schroeder Testimony.pdf (221.0 KBs)


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abuseofpower; congress; executiveorders; hearing; obama; obamalawless; yearofaction

1 posted on 02/26/2014 7:02:13 AM PST by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

2 posted on 02/26/2014 7:02:39 AM PST by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

This”Presaident”obviously believes that he can enforce(or not)ONLY the laws that he agrees with.This is Un-Constitutional and Articles of Impeachment should have been drawn up LONG AGO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

3 posted on 02/26/2014 7:07:43 AM PST by bandleader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

4 posted on 02/26/2014 7:09:09 AM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


5 posted on 02/26/2014 7:09:32 AM PST by Semper911 (When you want to rob Peter to pay Paul, you'll always have the support of Paul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bandleader

Starting at the 2 minute mark is Megyn Kelly with Jonathan Turley on the issue of recent announcement by DOJ

at 5:38 Turley mentioned he would testify today.

6 posted on 02/26/2014 7:16:53 AM PST by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Thanks for this thread! Keep the pressure ON!

7 posted on 02/26/2014 7:22:50 AM PST by Graewoulf (Democrats' Obamacare Socialist Health Insur. Tax violates U.S. Constitution AND Anti-Trust Law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf


8 posted on 02/26/2014 7:24:01 AM PST by greyfoxx39 (We can thank Mitt Romney for the present situation in our country. His feet are made of clay.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow
Create a nation according to your political ideals and care for its people. Or deliberately oppress them.
9 posted on 02/26/2014 7:25:01 AM PST by Berlin_Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Very interesting - thanks!

10 posted on 02/26/2014 7:29:00 AM PST by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

I can’t hear ol Conyers. Wonder if this is on cspan. Thanks for posting.

11 posted on 02/26/2014 7:29:19 AM PST by Jane Long (While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs assist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; potlatch

They always ask if you believe in Rule of Law.
All we have is “law” liked by Holder.
They keep throwing their ideology up at the wall, to see what will stick.
It’s all sticking. Come on, House majority, take care of business!
GOP-e and Tea Party need to unite on this.

12 posted on 02/26/2014 7:29:30 AM PST by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

I agree - audio is low — Didn’t see it listed on c-span

Member List

13 posted on 02/26/2014 7:31:49 AM PST by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow


14 posted on 02/26/2014 7:35:23 AM PST by kitkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

H.Res. 442, the Stop This Overreaching Presidency Resolution, directs the House to institute legal action to require the President to comply with the law. This resolution does not require a vote in the Senate.

15 posted on 02/26/2014 7:42:57 AM PST by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow
A fresh reading of George Washington's "Farewell Address" might be in order. The following excerpt contains cautions pertinent to today's headline news on a number of points:
This government, the offspring of our own choice, uninfluenced and unawed, adopted upon full investigation and mature deliberation, completely free in its principles, in the distribution of its powers, uniting security with energy, and containing within itself a provision for its own amendment, has a just claim to your confidence and your support. Respect for its authority, compliance with its laws, acquiescence in its measures, are duties enjoined by the fundamental maxims of true liberty. The basis of our political systems is the right of the people to make and to alter their constitutions of government. But the Constitution which at any time exists, till changed by an explicit and authentic act of the whole people, is sacredly obligatory upon all. The very idea of the power and the right of the people to establish government presupposes the duty of every individual to obey the established government.

All obstructions to the execution of the laws, all combinations and associations, under whatever plausible character, with the real design to direct, control, counteract, or awe the regular deliberation and action of the constituted authorities, are destructive of this fundamental principle, and of fatal tendency. They serve to organize faction, to give it an artificial and extraordinary force; to put, in the place of the delegated will of the nation the will of a party, often a small but artful and enterprising minority of the community; and, according to the alternate triumphs of different parties, to make the public administration the mirror of the ill-concerted and incongruous projects of faction, rather than the organ of consistent and wholesome plans digested by common counsels and modified by mutual interests.

However combinations or associations of the above description may now and then answer popular ends, they are likely, in the course of time and things, to become potent engines, by which cunning, ambitious, and unprincipled men will be enabled to subvert the power of the people and to usurp for themselves the reins of government, destroying afterwards the very engines which have lifted them to unjust dominion.

Towards the preservation of your government, and the permanency of your present happy state, it is requisite, not only that you steadily discountenance irregular oppositions to its acknowledged authority, but also that you resist with care the spirit of innovation upon its principles, however specious the pretexts. One method of assault may be to effect, in the forms of the Constitution, alterations which will impair the energy of the system, and thus to undermine what cannot be directly overthrown. In all the changes to which you may be invited, remember that time and habit are at least as necessary to fix the true character of governments as of other human institutions; that experience is the surest standard by which to test the real tendency of the existing constitution of a country; that facility in changes, upon the credit of mere hypothesis and opinion, exposes to perpetual change, from the endless variety of hypothesis and opinion; and remember, especially, that for the efficient management of your common interests, in a country so extensive as ours, a government of as much vigor as is consistent with the perfect security of liberty is indispensable. Liberty itself will find in such a government, with powers properly distributed and adjusted, its surest guardian. It is, indeed, little else than a name, where the government is too feeble to withstand the enterprises of faction, to confine each member of the society within the limits prescribed by the laws, and to maintain all in the secure and tranquil enjoyment of the rights of person and property.

I have already intimated to you the danger of parties in the State, with particular reference to the founding of them on geographical discriminations. Let me now take a more comprehensive view, and warn you in the most solemn manner against the baneful effects of the spirit of party generally.

This spirit, unfortunately, is inseparable from our nature, having its root in the strongest passions of the human mind. It exists under different shapes in all governments, more or less stifled, controlled, or repressed; but, in those of the popular form, it is seen in its greatest rankness, and is truly their worst enemy.

The alternate domination of one faction over another, sharpened by the spirit of revenge, natural to party dissension, which in different ages and countries has perpetrated the most horrid enormities, is itself a frightful despotism. But this leads at length to a more formal and permanent despotism. The disorders and miseries which result gradually incline the minds of men to seek security and repose in the absolute power of an individual; and sooner or later the chief of some prevailing faction, more able or more fortunate than his competitors, turns this disposition to the purposes of his own elevation, on the ruins of public liberty.

Without looking forward to an extremity of this kind (which nevertheless ought not to be entirely out of sight), the common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are sufficient to make it the interest and duty of a wise people to discourage and restrain it.

It serves always to distract the public councils and enfeeble the public administration. It agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another, foments occasionally riot and insurrection. It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which finds a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party passions. Thus the policy and the will of one country are subjected to the policy and will of another.

There is an opinion that parties in free countries are useful checks upon the administration of the government and serve to keep alive the spirit of liberty. This within certain limits is probably true; and in governments of a monarchical cast, patriotism may look with indulgence, if not with favor, upon the spirit of party. But in those of the popular character, in governments purely elective, it is a spirit not to be encouraged. From their natural tendency, it is certain there will always be enough of that spirit for every salutary purpose. And there being constant danger of excess, the effort ought to be by force of public opinion, to mitigate and assuage it. A fire not to be quenched, it demands a uniform vigilance to prevent its bursting into a flame, lest, instead of warming, it should consume.

It is important, likewise, that the habits of thinking in a free country should inspire caution in those entrusted with its administration, to confine themselves within their respective constitutional spheres, avoiding in the exercise of the powers of one department to encroach upon another. The spirit of encroachment tends to consolidate the powers of all the departments in one, and thus to create, whatever the form of government, a real despotism. A just estimate of that love of power, and proneness to abuse it, which predominates in the human heart, is sufficient to satisfy us of the truth of this position. The necessity of reciprocal checks in the exercise of political power, by dividing and distributing it into different depositaries, and constituting each the guardian of the public weal against invasions by the others, has been evinced by experiments ancient and modern; some of them in our country and under our own eyes. To preserve them must be as necessary as to institute them. If, in the opinion of the people, the distribution or modification of the constitutional powers be in any particular wrong, let it be corrected by an amendment in the way which the Constitution designates. But let there be no change by usurpation; for though this, in one instance, may be the instrument of good, it is the customary weapon by which free governments are destroyed. The precedent must always greatly overbalance in permanent evil any partial or transient benefit, which the use can at any time yield.

Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism, who should labor to subvert these great pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens. The mere politician, equally with the pious man, ought to respect and to cherish them. A volume could not trace all their connections with private and public felicity. Let it simply be asked: Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths which are the instruments of investigation in courts of justice? let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.

It is substantially true that virtue or morality is a necessary spring of popular government. The rule, indeed, extends with more or less force to every species of free government. Who that is a sincere friend to it can look with indifference upon attempts to shake the foundation of the fabric? (End of Excerpt from Washington's Farewell Address)

16 posted on 02/26/2014 7:49:14 AM PST by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Bearing in mind, of course, that to Obama, “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution...” means making sure there’s an adequate number of security guards at the National Archive.

17 posted on 02/26/2014 7:53:51 AM PST by william clark (Ecclesiastes 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow
Regarding the powers of the Presidency, I recall, during one of the presidential Republicans in office, the President decided that he didn't have to spend all the money Congress had allocated in the funding laws. The Democrats in Congress called the President on this, saying that they allocated the dollars, and those dollars will be spent whether that spending was needed to accomplish the goals of the law involved.

So why is this President ignoring the parallels to the same type situation several decades ago? Even worse, one can claim that the Executive has the right, and the duty, to spend money as appropriate, up to the statutory limit, instead of blowing it all whether it's needed or not -- that's one of the functions of the Chief Executive and his people.

18 posted on 02/26/2014 8:00:09 AM PST by asinclair (Political hot air is a renewable energy resource)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Unfortunately, Emperor Hussein I will never allow this to be implemented.

19 posted on 02/26/2014 8:21:54 AM PST by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


20 posted on 02/26/2014 8:47:47 AM PST by Faith65 (Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Congress will not impeach, so they need to use the power of the purse. They should aggressively slash funding and hold firm on those cuts. They should then further cut any agency that fails to enforce relevant laws - give the bureaucrats a reason (their own self-interest) to push back against lawless evil in our White House.

21 posted on 02/26/2014 9:10:47 AM PST by Pollster1 ("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Thank you for the link.

22 posted on 02/26/2014 9:38:21 AM PST by Faith65 (Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow
Like a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying NOTHING.

Dictator Zero can do whatever he wants, and nobody on this Earth can stop him.

23 posted on 02/26/2014 10:28:10 AM PST by backwoods-engineer (Blog:
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Faith65; All

If you go to this web page you can see the hearing - it starts about 35 minutes into it.

24 posted on 02/26/2014 11:33:18 AM PST by Whenifhow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ntnychik

Bump to everything you said!

25 posted on 02/26/2014 12:31:11 PM PST by potlatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Thank you.

26 posted on 02/26/2014 12:57:22 PM PST by Faith65 (Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: backwoods-engineer
...nobody on this Earth can stop him

Then I guess we'll have to ask for the stopping to come from Elsewhere.

27 posted on 02/26/2014 6:27:23 PM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson