The CBO can only analyze the data they are given. Then they bend the statement within a range that is most favorable to the democrats politically. When the range looks bad, they usually add a qualifier to their number.
So... “It will cost 500K to 1 million jobs give or take a million.”
Private sector employees PRODUCE tax money. Government sector employees CONSUME tax money. When there are too many government employees or too few private sector employees, then there is not enough tax money. The government then has to borrow money to pay the government employees. The government then has to pay interest on the money it has borrowed to pay government employees. So, we end up in a vicious circle of borrowing more money to pay the interest on the money we have already borrowed to pay government employees.
Normally, we have the Republicans in charge for a few years to try and bring some sanity to the government budget. For whatever reasons, President Bush did not attempt to bring sanity to the federal budget. This means that since Bill Clinton took office in 1992, we have not had a President who tried to bring sanity to the federal budget. That is 22 years. That is too long to have such irresponsibility and thievery going on with the federal budget.
People with jobs and good bank accounts don't need 'Rat bennies like Obamaphones and food stamps and 50 extra weeks of meagre unemployment comp.