Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The True State Of The Economy: Record Number Of College Graduates Live In Their Parents' Basement
Zero Hedge ^ | 02/14/2014 | Tyler Durden

Posted on 02/15/2014 11:40:53 AM PST by SeekAndFind

Scratch one more bullish thesis for the housing recovery, and the economic recovery in general.

Over the past several years, optimists had often cited household formation as a key component of pent up demand for home purchases. So much for that.

Recall that last August, the WSJ noted that in a report on the status of families, "the Census Bureau said 13.6% of Americans ages 25 to 34 were living with their parents in 2012, up slightly from 13.4% in 2011. Though the trend began before the recession, it accelerated sharply during the downturn. In the early 2000s, about 10% of people in this age group lived at home." It concluded, quite logically, that "the share of young adults living with their parents edged up last year despite improvements in the economy—a sign that the effects of the recession are lingering."

Of course, the "improvements in the economy" were once again confused with the ongoing Fed- and corporate buyback-driven surge in the stock market, which has since been refuted to have any relationship to underlying economic conditions, and instead is merely the key factor leading to record class disparity - a very heated topic among both politicians and economists in recent months.

But going back to the topic of Americans living with their parents, today Gallup reported that 14% percent of adults between the ages of 24 and 34 - those in the post-college years when most young adults are trying to establish independence -- report living at home with their parents. By contrast, roughly half of 18- to 23-year-olds, many of whom are still finishing their education, are currently living at home.

While this is an approximation of the Census Bureau's own results which should be released in a few months, a 14% print in the critical 24-34 age group means that the percentage of college grads (or those otherwise falling into this age group even if uneducated) living in their parents basement has hit a fresh all time high.

As a reminder, this was the most recent visual update from the WSJ as of last year:

 

Here is what Gallup had to say about this distrubing result:

An important milestone in adulthood is establishing independence from one's parents, including finding a job, a place to live and, for most, a spouse or partner, and starting one's own family. However, there are potential roadblocks on the path to independence that may force young adults to live with their parents longer, including a weak job market, the high cost of living, significant college debt, and helping care for an elderly or disabled parent.

 

A statistical model that takes into account a variety of demographic characteristics indicates that three situational factors are most likely to distinguish the group of 24- to 34-year-olds living at home from their peers:

Being married may better explain why young adults move out of their parents' home than why single adults live at home. For those living at home, their situation may have more to do with their job or income status than their marital status. Being single, however, may make living with parents a more feasible option for young adults than it would be if they were married.

 

Employment status ranks as the second-most-important predictor of young adults' living situation once they are beyond college age. Specifically, 67% of those living on their own are employed full time, compared with 50% of those living with their parents.

 

 

The unemployment rate, as calculated by Gallup, among those in the workforce is twice as high for post-college-aged adults living with their parents as it is for their counterparts who are not living with their parents, 14.6% vs. 7.1%.

 

The underemployment rate, which combines the percentage unemployed with the percentage working part time but wanting full-time work, is 32.8% among those living at home and 15.4% among those living on their own. In other words, among young adults who live with their parents and are working or actively looking for work, nearly one in three are in a substandard employment situation.

The employment observations are not surprising: after all, one would never voluntarily live with their parents into their thirties, unless one was pathologically lazy and unwilling to branch out on their own of course, if the labor situtation in the economy permitted getting a job which allowed one to at least afford rent.

Neither is it surprising that college grads, saddled with a record amounts of student debt, now well over $1 trillion, or more than the total US credit card debt outstanding, is also crushing college graduate confidence about being able to be cash flow positive once they seek to start lives on their own with the associated cash needs.

However, the marriage observation is more disturbing, and goes to the argument of incremental household formation: namely there is none. In other words, that missing link that at least superficially would provide for some semblance of justification for the rise in house prices that had nothing to do with investor demand and offshore illicit cash laundry using US real estate, is gone.

And while this conforms with Gallup's own implications of these data, there is more bad news:

A 2012 report from Ohio State University sociologists showed that it is increasingly common for young adults to live at home with their parents. The high costs of housing and a relatively weak job market are key factors that may force, or encourage, young adults to stay at home.... The biggest impetus for leaving home seems to be marriage, easily the strongest predictor of one's living arrangement among those between the ages of 24 and 34. This indicates that if the marriage rate increases in the future, the percentage living with their parents may decline. Earlier Gallup research suggests that most unmarried Americans do have a goal of getting married someday.

 

Also, those who have secured full-time employment or have earned college degrees are more likely to have gotten a place of their own to live. An improving job market and economy should lead to a decrease in the percentage of young adults living with their parents.

To sum it up: a record number of college grads are optin not to start a household and instead live with their parents, and just as relevant:

"An improving job market and economy should lead to a decrease in the percentage of young adults living with their parents."

Considering that the percentage of young adults living with their parents is now an all time high, what does that say about the true state of the job market?

He knows the answer.

 

Update: just hours after we posted this, Gallup released a follow up report that was largely as expected, and confirms the desolate picture beneath the glitzy surface:

Young Adults Living at Home Less Likely to Be "Thriving"

 

Young adults between the ages of 24 and 34 who live at home with their parents are significantly less likely to be "thriving" than those in the same age group who don't live with their parents.

 

 

These results are based on Gallup Daily tracking interviews conducted from Aug. 7-Dec. 29, 2013, in which adults younger than 35 were asked about their current living arrangements. Fourteen percent of those between the ages of 24 and 34 report that they live at home with their parents.

 

Gallup classifies Americans as "thriving," "struggling," or "suffering," according to how they rate their current and future lives on a ladder scale with steps numbered from 0 to 10, based on the Cantril Self-Anchoring Striving Scale. People are considered thriving if they rate their current lives a 7 or higher and their lives in five years an 8 or higher.

 

... even after accounting for marital status, employment, education, and a number of other demographic variables, those living at home between the ages of 24 and 34 still are less likely to be thriving. This suggests that while living with one's parents may have some benefits for young people who have not yet found their full footing in society, the net effect of living at home lowers young adults' perceptions of where they stand in life. In other words, even among young adults who have equal status in terms of being single, not being employed full time, and not having a college education, those who do not live at home are more likely to be thriving than those living at home. Something about living at home appears to drive down young adults' overall life evaluations.

 

Bottom Line

 

This research on the well-being of young adults living at home with their parents is the first of its kind at Gallup, although research conducted at Ohio State and elsewhere suggests that living at home is increasingly common among those younger than 35 today.

 

The data show that those between the ages of 24 and 34 who live at home tend to be unattached -- in the sense that they are not married and less likely to have a full-time job -- and also to be less well-educated. The research reviewed in this report underscores the idea that living at home may have some emotional costs for young adults -- particularly in terms of their perceptions that they are not enjoying the best possible life, beyond those associated with being unemployed or unmarried.

 

Times may change. If marriage rates rebound, if the job market for young adults improves, and if more young Americans go to college, then living at home may be less common in the years ahead, and if that happens, the overall well-being of young Americans may improve.

Yes indeed: times may change if... Then again, when times change they may get far, far worse.



TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: collegegrads; economy; jobs

1 posted on 02/15/2014 11:40:53 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

2 posted on 02/15/2014 11:47:43 AM PST by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I think this is inaccurate reporting. Lots of homes don’t have basements, so many of these grads are simply living back home in their parents’ house, without even the separation of a basement living space.

Not a good situation for all sorts of reasons and most so-called economic proposals from Obama and others will only make matters worse.


3 posted on 02/15/2014 11:53:37 AM PST by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FReepers; Patriots; FRiends







Free Republic is Your Voice and Your Forum!
We Really Need and Appreciate Your Loyal Support!
PLEASE Make Your Donation, Monthly, if You POSSIBLY & RELIABLY can!

4 posted on 02/15/2014 12:20:47 PM PST by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Why would anyone live in the basement instead of their bedroom?


5 posted on 02/15/2014 12:30:48 PM PST by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I wonder about how much of this is a natural demographic evolution.

Up until World War I, it was seen as normal for adult children to live in the family home, unless there was no room or they had particular success enough to build or buy their own home.

However, after the war, the very accurate song (1918) was, “How ‘Ya Gonna Keep ‘Em Down on the Farm? (After They’ve Seen Paree)”. The truth is, they couldn’t. Vast numbers of Americans left rural farms and headed into the cities.

Many remained, however, until the double whammy of the Dust Bowl, which wiped out thousands of farms from Texas to Canada, and the Great Depression (where the federal government wiped out thousands more farms intentionally.)

Finally, after World War II, there was a huge rush West to the boom town cities and their suburbs. With prosperity it *unusually* became the norm for children to move out when adults.

However, once again, times may be changing. A combination of factors including student loans, inflated home prices, high taxes, and far less job security, are making the old ways seem a lot more sensible.

If your parents have a large, mortgage free home, why should a single child move out? Not only can they save a fortune if they work, but they can help their parents in their old age, instead of paying a fortune for their care.

The drawback, of course, is marriage and children, since most suburban homes are designed for one family, not two. And marriage is designed for two people, not a spouse and their parents, at least in the early years.

Things change. Perhaps people will start planning ahead by building two or even three family homes, for them and their children. If for no other reason, than prosperity may be like lightening, not striking in the same place twice.


6 posted on 02/15/2014 12:31:51 PM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy (WoT News: Rantburg.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“If you like living in your parent’s basement, you can keep living in your parent’s basement.”
If you do, we’ll list you as another success story in omoslem’s recovery, and take you off the unemployment rolls.


7 posted on 02/15/2014 12:31:59 PM PST by Fireone (Impeach and imprison, NOW! Treason and murder are still crimes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Raise the import tariffs and lower the income tax by an equal amount.


8 posted on 02/15/2014 12:46:43 PM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Has anyone seen any of these basement dwellers praising obamacare for putting them on their parents’ polities?


9 posted on 02/15/2014 1:02:36 PM PST by VerySadAmerican (".....Barrack, and the horse Mohammed rode in on.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“The unemployment rate, as calculated by Gallup, among those in the workforce” eh?

unemployment among those in the workforce?

what gobbledegook


10 posted on 02/15/2014 1:12:31 PM PST by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m sure a sizeable portion of these college graduates were gung-ho Obama Forward! idiots who will never make the connection regarding what dear leader did to them. They will watch Jon Stewart and think conservatives and Sarah Palin are the reason they are broke and will never be able to have a home of their own.


11 posted on 02/15/2014 1:23:06 PM PST by TheGipperWasRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

Isn’t that better than in a van down by the river?


12 posted on 02/15/2014 1:23:51 PM PST by bicyclerepair (TERM LIMITS .......... TERM LIMITS .......... TERM LIMITS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: grundle

It’s slightly harder for the parents to know what you’re up to.


13 posted on 02/15/2014 1:30:31 PM PST by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

My lovely neighbors who include a mother and a father and 3 adult children all live together under one roof. Two of the children have very good jobs and contribute to the household. The Third, a girl, is finding it hard to find her place in society. They are all hardworking, decent people and fine neighbors. None of them are on the dole - the young people either cannot afford to move into their own apartments or choose to live with their families who they seem to love very much. It reminds me of tales told to me by my mother who lived through the very worst of the Depression.


14 posted on 02/15/2014 1:43:34 PM PST by miss marmelstein (Richard Lives Yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

Separate entrance.

;-)


15 posted on 02/15/2014 2:15:14 PM PST by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bicyclerepair

Well according to Gary North, Christian economist, until a person takes responsibility for his own situation, he delays his maturity


16 posted on 02/15/2014 3:08:03 PM PST by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: yldstrk

so that’s what happened to Obama!


17 posted on 02/15/2014 5:37:08 PM PST by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: miss marmelstein

The Walton’s on Walton’s Mountain or The Ewing’s on South Fork.


18 posted on 02/15/2014 5:38:29 PM PST by griswold3 (Post-Christian America is living on borrowed moral heritage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

#Jellin’LikeAfelonWithBubblesByYellen
Stolen from the comments there... Just had to repost it.


19 posted on 02/15/2014 5:39:22 PM PST by griswold3 (Post-Christian America is living on borrowed moral heritage)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: griswold3

Maybe they could move to get a job and gain some semblance of self-respect. There are jobs in North Dakota.


20 posted on 02/15/2014 6:15:39 PM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: griswold3

Maybe they could move to get a job and gain some semblance of self-respect. There are jobs in North Dakota.


21 posted on 02/15/2014 6:15:39 PM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: griswold3

Maybe they could move to get a job and gain some semblance of self-respect. There are jobs in North Dakota.


22 posted on 02/15/2014 6:16:08 PM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen
Maybe they could move to get a job and gain some semblance of self-respect. There are jobs in North Dakota.

A degree in Gender Studies isn't going to carry a lot of weight in the North Dakota oil patch...

23 posted on 02/15/2014 6:19:45 PM PST by okie01 (The Mainstream Media -- IGNORANCE ON PARADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: okie01

That may be, but you can get honest work. You don’t even need experience. However, I’m sure anyone can find some reason to not move there and work. Excuses.


24 posted on 02/15/2014 6:28:37 PM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: griswold3

Nothing wrong with families living together, right? Unless, you have a son who is allowed his own room, never has to come downstairs - or work - and has blackout shutters on his windows, is allowed to play violent video games and watch child porn, and has a ton of guns. Then we’ve got another problem.

But families living together seems like a good idea to me. Better than being dependent on government.


25 posted on 02/16/2014 3:22:18 AM PST by miss marmelstein (Richard Lives Yet!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

How many million failures to launch are the talking about.

%’s don’t really mean that much.

So what is number of failures to launch?

Thanks


26 posted on 02/16/2014 8:24:02 AM PST by Grampa Dave ( Obozo Care is a Trinity of Lies! Obozo Care is probably a serious Black Swan event.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker; Jonty30

Thanks.


27 posted on 02/16/2014 10:04:31 PM PST by grundle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson