Posted on 01/17/2014 11:10:29 AM PST by COUNTrecount
The most ignorant individual ever to occupy the Oval Office.
In this administration, it is incompetance, politics and lies, 100% of the time.
That’s because he was focused like a laser on not knowing anything about the IRS’ surveillance and harassment of Conservative groups, in between moments when he could no longer ignore not knowing about the Beghazi terror attacks, which he had to intersperse with not knowing anything about how bad George Bush left the economy when he, Barack the Ignorant, took office, except for those times when he, Barack, didn’t appreciate the magnitude of the accidental untruths he told about being able to keep your doctor. There are so many things 0bama doesn’t know anything about, but DAMN he knows about how to reform the healthcare system and how your taxes would be better spent feeding and pretending to educate ferals in our fine lib-run cities.
Who does he think he is? SGT Schulze from Hogan’s Heroes? He don’t know Jack $#!+. I know Jack and he is one stupid SOB.
The only thing he knows is that his administration will fundamentally transform our nation.
Plausible deniability
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Plausible deniability is a term coined by the CIA in the early 1960s to describe the withholding of information from senior officials in order to protect them from repercussions in the event that illegal or unpopular activities by the CIA became public knowledge.
The term most often refers to the capacity of senior officials in a formal or informal chain of command to deny knowledge of and/or responsibility for any damnable actions committed by the lower ranks because of a lack of evidence that can confirm their participation, even if they were personally involved or at least willfully ignorant of said actions. In the case that illegal or otherwise disreputable and unpopular activities become public, high-ranking officials may deny any awareness of such act in order to insulate themselves and shift blame on the agents who carried out the acts, confident that their doubters will be unable to prove otherwise. The lack of evidence to the contrary ostensibly makes the denial plausible, that is, credible. The term typically implies forethought, such as intentionally setting up the conditions to plausibly avoid responsibility for one’s (future) actions or knowledge. In some organizations, legal doctrines such as command responsibility exist to hold major parties responsible for the actions of subordinates involved in heinous acts and nullify any legal protection that their denial of involvement would carry.
In politics and espionage, deniability refers to the ability of a “powerful player” or intelligence agency to “pass the buck” and avoid “blowback” by secretly arranging for an action to be taken on their behalf by a third party ostensibly unconnected with the major player. In political campaigns, plausible deniability enables candidates to stay “clean” and denounce third-party advertisements that use unethical approaches or potentially libellous innuendo.
More generally, “plausible deniability” can also apply to any act that leaves little or no evidence of wrongdoing or abuse. Examples of this are the use of electric shock, waterboarding or pain-compliance holds as a means of non-invasive torture or punishment, leaving few or no tangible signs that the abuse ever took place.
Plausible deniability is also a legal concept. It refers to lack of evidence proving an allegation. Standards of proof vary in civil and criminal cases. In civil cases, the standard of proof is “preponderance of the evidence” whereas in a criminal matter, the standard is “beyond a reasonable doubt.” If an opponent lacks incontrovertible proof (evidence) of their allegation, one can “plausibly deny” the allegation even though it may be true.
maybe if he watched FOX news he’d know what’s going on in his administration
and it sure makes Clint Eastwood’s debating an empty chair rather meaningful!
What obama really said in his 45 minute speech; We spied on most of the world, its leaders and all of the people of the United States, we got caught, so let me be perfectly clear, I’m going to hire two more democrats, one at NSA and one at the WH to provide me more cover and appoint Podesta to do an in depth study to cover my ass.
I call BS. How can he not know? They work for him.
5.56mm
And now that he does know, he is preparing to double down and kick it into high gear...
So, Zer0 claims he is ignorant. . . .
obama aides lie.
loved that show.
He never knows nuttin' 'bout nuttin.'
HE doesn’t know what HE doesn’t know.
WE have no idea of what HE doesn’t know or when HE didn’t know it.
Let a White Hispanic send a thug to the promised land and BO sticks his nose in it.
Let a White Cop have a rift with a Black Professor and BO sticks his nose in it.
Want a prediction on the Super Bowl, Final Four, World Series and BO is Johnny-On-The-Spot (a construction outhouse) to give an opinion.
Anything when it comes to HIS JOB and he, like Hitlery before him, doesn’t recall.
Mr. President, you’re not fat enough to be John Banner.
BHO....the man who knew too little.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.