Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity: Question re: fighting an insurance denial

Posted on 01/10/2014 11:47:53 AM PST by CheathamCountyTN

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: CheathamCountyTN
All of this happened between October and December last fall.

OK, people assumed this had just happened.

So the policy went into effect prior to January 1st.

Not a good outlook for legal action, other than bankruptcy.

But still have her find a good advocate.

21 posted on 01/10/2014 2:57:05 PM PST by steve86 (Some things aren't really true but you wouldn't be half surprised if they were.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: CheathamCountyTN

From your description it is certain she contracted the infection before the policy went into effect, unfortunately.


22 posted on 01/10/2014 3:01:53 PM PST by steve86 (Some things aren't really true but you wouldn't be half surprised if they were.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CheathamCountyTN

I think the problem they’re having is with the reason a hysterectomy was performed if the admitting diagnosis was a bacterial infection inside the gut. That’s something for the doctor to explain to insurance in the appeal. They’re seeing it as someone getting rear ended and claiming to need a new headlight.


23 posted on 01/10/2014 3:14:06 PM PST by ToastedHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ToastedHead

All they knew when she was rolled into the operating room was that she had a major infection somewhere..probably in her belly since that was where the pain was. I asked her if she knew whether the docs could have gotten the infection out (her belly was FULL of pus..docs said they had NEVER seen anything like it on a live person)without doing the hysterectomy but she wasn’t sure. The infection was in her fallopian tubes as well as everywhere else in her abdomen. This was a BIG emergency situation.


24 posted on 01/10/2014 6:35:59 PM PST by CheathamCountyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: CheathamCountyTN

It sounds like a medical coding thing. That’s not my line of business, but as long as the hospital records show an immediate need for removal of the uterus and related girly parts, it shouldn’t be too hard to appeal. It’s not like it was a face lift thrown in on a claim. Most importantly, glad she’s ok.


25 posted on 01/10/2014 6:44:00 PM PST by ToastedHead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: CheathamCountyTN

So if you have cancer but don’t know it and you go to the doc the same day your insurance policy goes into effect and, after 3 weeks of testing and searching for a cause for your symptoms, you’re diagnosed with cancer, that’s considered pre-existing? How could she have known she had an infection like that if she had no symptoms? Seems like if the illness reared its ugly head on the day the policy goes into effect, that’s an unlucky coincidence for the insurance company.


26 posted on 01/10/2014 6:44:34 PM PST by CheathamCountyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson