Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ransomed

It was Sotomayor! Very surprising!


9 posted on 01/06/2014 8:10:50 AM PST by Kit cat (OBummer must go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Kit cat

I guess she turned it over to the whole court, from what I am seeing.

Freegards


10 posted on 01/06/2014 8:14:00 AM PST by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Kit cat

She also granted that stay to the Little Sisters of the Poor.


14 posted on 01/06/2014 8:18:01 AM PST by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: Ransomed; Kit cat; Lurking Libertarian
No, Sotomayor didn't grant the stay on her own. She could have denied the stay on her own, but she chose to refer the stay request to the whole court.

If she had denied the stay request, Utah would have had the right to submit it to a second justice of their choice per standard SCOTUS procedure.

Utah would have chosen Scalia or Thomas. Either could, and likely would, have granted the stay or referred it to the whole court as Sotomayor did.

Sotomayor just circumvented that second stay request because she knew it was inevitable and simply referred it to the whole court herself rather than make Utah go through the legal motions.

IMHO, this is not indicative of her position in any way and is not a surprise. LL may or may not have more to offer by way of legal procedure, etc.

38 posted on 01/06/2014 11:22:49 AM PST by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson