All very strange.
1 posted on
12/28/2013 2:15:07 PM PST by
Daralundy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: Daralundy
Wait a minute, aren’t those transformers shaped like cans? It’s the cans! He doesn’t like cans! Stay away from the cans!
51 posted on
12/28/2013 3:23:35 PM PST by
NonValueAdded
(It's not the penalty, it's the lack of coverage on 1 Jan. Think about it.)
To: Daralundy
Somebody who got fired got mad.
53 posted on
12/28/2013 3:28:55 PM PST by
gaijin
To: Daralundy
The bad news is that officials don't know who the shooter(s) were, and most importantly, whether further attacks are planned. Wait a minute here! Aren't we being told that the NSA's massive snooping and vaccuuming up of all telephone/cellphone call records are preventing terrorist acts like this?
Didn't a federal judge just recently tell us that these "programs" are stopping these types of activities?
You mean the judge and the Government lied???!!
54 posted on
12/28/2013 3:41:34 PM PST by
usconservative
(When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
To: Daralundy
Mohammedans. Anyone want to bet against?
56 posted on
12/28/2013 3:48:13 PM PST by
arthurus
(Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson ONLINEhttp://steshaw.org/economics-in-one-lesson/)
To: Daralundy
"Jon Wellinghoff, the chairman of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, said last month that an attack by intruders with guns and rifles could be just as devastating as a cyber attack. A shooter "could get 200 yards away with a .22 rifle and take the whole thing out," Wellinghoff said last month at a conference sponsored by Bloomberg. The idiocy of bureaucrats is hardly more stark. The story is about 100 rounds from a "high powered rifle" fired at close range with muted damage. Then this idiot makes this statement, and thinks we'll believe it.
59 posted on
12/28/2013 4:51:45 PM PST by
norwaypinesavage
(Galileo: In science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of one individual)
To: Daralundy
Did anyone, besides Buckwheat and the 50 IQ surrender monkeys here on FR, really believe that the jokes in Homeland Security would be capable of stopping terrorists or going door-to-door and confiscating our weapons?
To: Daralundy
Them things cook off real good:
68 posted on
12/28/2013 6:03:41 PM PST by
PLMerite
(Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
To: Admin Moderator
Hi, can you tell me why all my posts are subject to review?
70 posted on
12/28/2013 6:49:19 PM PST by
1010RD
(First, Do No Harm)
To: Daralundy
It should be easy to solve and capture the terrorists...
FBI has it's new, standard description handy:
- Christian;
- Constitutionalist;
- Gun owner:
- Fears the big oppressive U.S. government; and,
- Tea-Party member or supporter.
Round them up...Shoot their dogs and wives....Burn their children...
Problem solved.
73 posted on
12/28/2013 7:11:00 PM PST by
SuperLuminal
(Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
To: Daralundy; Lazamataz; Travis McGee
78 posted on
12/30/2013 6:46:15 PM PST by
Southack
(The one thing preppers need from the 1st World? http://tinyurl.com/ktfwljc .)
To: Daralundy
Israeli Independence Day in 2013 was April 16, maybe it was a Hizbollah dry run, or even a demonstration of what they could do designed to “persuade.”
79 posted on
09/24/2015 4:52:33 AM PDT by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson