To: highball
A correlation with gays is not what is significant. What is significant is the correlation between gay and early death. That age of death of 47 years is another number in that array.
After a while, the correlation between early death and gayness makes any thought that this relates only to known connections to particular diseases irrelevant.
38 posted on
12/24/2013 4:22:33 AM PST by
xzins
( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
To: Coronal
39 posted on
12/24/2013 4:27:07 AM PST by
xzins
( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
To: xzins
Indeed, just like in Pakistan. Cripple, blind, maim and castrate people into being gay, makes them good little beggars for government taxes and tourist donations.
Poverty pimps. Obama is expert at it. It is how he was raised.
To: xzins
A correlation with gays is not what is significant. What is significant is the correlation between gay and early death. That age of death of 47 years is another number in that array.
But no, it isn't. Not if his gay lifestyle had nothing to do with his premature death.
Otherwise you have to use every gay death by car crash as somehow being "proof" that the lifestyle is unhealthy. And while you're at it, the death of my family friend from ALS in his early 40s is proof of what, the dangers of being Norwegian?
Our arguments are stronger when we stick to actual facts. We don't need to veer into the nonsensical.
49 posted on
12/24/2013 6:54:04 AM PST by
highball
("I never should have switched from scotch to martinis." -- the last words of Humphrey Bogart)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson