Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Health Plans Urged to Extend Enrollment (and offer retroactive coverage)
New York Times ^ | December 12, 2013 | ROBERT PEAR

Posted on 12/12/2013 6:41:52 PM PST by reaganaut1

WASHINGTON — With many Americans still foiled in their efforts to buy insurance under the new health care law, the Obama administration moved Thursday to give them more time to sign up and pay premiums, and it extended a program for people with cancer, heart disease and other serious illnesses.

The administration strongly encouraged insurance companies to let new subscribers go outside their networks of doctors and hospitals and refill prescriptions for drugs not on their lists of approved medications.

Kathleen Sebelius, the secretary of health and human services, said these steps would ensure that consumers have “a smooth transition without any gaps in coverage” or disruption of treatment.

The steps are intended to reduce problems widely expected to occur next month. Hundreds of thousands of people may gain coverage, some for the first time. But insurers say they have no record of many potential customers who believe they have enrolled, so some patients may be disappointed when they seek care at doctors’ offices, clinics and drugstores.

Such disappointment could create huge political problems for the White House, just as President Obama is trying to highlight benefits of the new health care law.

The White House originally required people to sign up by Dec. 15 for coverage beginning in January, when major provisions of the new law take effect. On Nov. 22, the administration gave consumers eight more days, until Dec. 23.

Ms. Sebelius went further on Thursday, urging insurers to provide “retroactive coverage for people who sign up after Jan. 1.”

Republicans in Congress expressed surprise. They said the administration was essentially telling companies like Humana and WellPoint to insure people before payment and change the very nature of their networks and coverage on a case-by-case basis.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: obamacare; obamacarenrollment; retroactivecoverage; rinocare; sebelius; socialism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last
Why not cut to the chase and require the insurers to provide free coverage? The insurers collaborated with the Rats and are getting their just desserts, but bankrupting them would bring us closer to single-payer.
1 posted on 12/12/2013 6:41:52 PM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Although it's been said many times many ways, "clusterf__k" IS Obamacare.
2 posted on 12/12/2013 6:44:36 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

3 posted on 12/12/2013 6:45:51 PM PST by JPG (Yes We Can morphs into Make It Hurt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JPG

perfect!


4 posted on 12/12/2013 6:46:28 PM PST by dontreadthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Republicans in Congress expressed surprise. They said the administration was essentially telling companies like Humana and WellPoint to insure people before payment and change the very nature of their networks and coverage on a case-by-case basis.

Fundamental change. It's what the people voted for.

5 posted on 12/12/2013 6:46:56 PM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Obama broke it but he wants everybody else to fix it.


6 posted on 12/12/2013 6:47:59 PM PST by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Is there any law at all or is it just whatever Obama and his agents say it is on any given day? When is he just going to deem everyone is covered by Obamacare and all doctors and hospitals must treat everyone ... or else?
7 posted on 12/12/2013 6:50:38 PM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
The administration encouraged insurers on Thursday to accept late payments and partial payments

Did I hear the IRS is going to play by the same rules at tax paying time?

8 posted on 12/12/2013 6:54:28 PM PST by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
"but I've got a pre-existing condition"
9 posted on 12/12/2013 6:56:28 PM PST by dontreadthis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AU72

Obama should be under this law under president Cheney!!! But, Cheney is not evil like Zer0 and would not demand a late term abortion.


10 posted on 12/12/2013 7:04:24 PM PST by MtnClimber (A utopia without freedom is just a fancy name for prison. - Dean Kalahar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
"While these steps are voluntary, federal officials said they could consider an insurer’s response in deciding whether to allow the company to participate in the federal exchange in 2015. " Yep. Do not displease Dear Leader..
11 posted on 12/12/2013 7:06:14 PM PST by prairiebreeze (Don't be afraid to see what you see. -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
While these steps are voluntary, federal officials said they could consider an insurer’s response in deciding whether to allow the company to participate in the federal exchange in 2015.

In other words, a threat. Not getting paid? Doesn't matter. Extend coverage anyway and if you don't you're excluded from the xchange in 2015. Talk about dictatorial Govt...

The administration had predicted that up to 400,000 people would enroll in the high-risk pool. In fact, about 135,000 did so, but the cost of their claims has far exceeded White House estimates, exhausting most of the $5 billion provided by Congress.

So they got a quarter of projected participants, but money has ALREADY run out?

12 posted on 12/12/2013 7:09:17 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
require the insurers to provide free coverage?

Looks like that's exactly what they're being asked to do. They are being urged to allow people into the program who pay either nothing or partial payment.

And if they don't, they may not be able to continue on the exchange in 2015.

13 posted on 12/12/2013 7:11:08 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1; Kartographer

Heard Krauthammer with Greta talking about Sebelius changing the law/rules today and he said something like “she can’t just change that law”. Well, she did and Hussein has changed it over and over and what the hell difference does ANY law make? If you don’t like “x” law, then do whatever you want. I’ve had it with the whole bunch of nation killers.


14 posted on 12/12/2013 7:11:47 PM PST by Marcella ((Prepping can save your life today. I am a Christian, not a Muslim.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

With every passing day we get yet another taste of this crap sandwich that is 0bama(doesn’t)care.
Keep your doctor? Nah.
Keep your plan? Nah.
Sixty year old man? You need maternity care.
Keep your efficacious medication plan? Nah.
Only have a few more ‘productive’ years per the actuary charts? We’ll have to cut your care options.

I am both amazed and greatly saddened that the American people can’t see this for the hoax that it is. Every FReeper knows this is merely part of Zero’s plan for nationalized health care. But, even with all these stories about lost coverage, sky high premiums, deductibles and copays, there is no march on the DC. There is no outcry from the people.

Perhaps the sheeple are really just lemmings and mindless of the pending precipice that spells the doom of this grand experiment.

Perhaps we are due to write the dirge.


15 posted on 12/12/2013 7:17:04 PM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. 01-20-2016; I pray we make it that long.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dontreadthis; Kartographer

Your “picture” of Hussein with a deteriorating face is proof of what I have thought - HE IS AN INSECT. That is why a fly landed on his lip, a mouse ran across in front of him, bees and mice were in the White House. HE IS ONE OF THEM. All along we had no proof of where he came from, no proof of where he went to college or university, his social security card is really some dead guy’s up north somewhere, and on and on - he is an insect and that’s why we know nothing positive about him.


16 posted on 12/12/2013 7:18:56 PM PST by Marcella ((Prepping can save your life today. I am a Christian, not a Muslim.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: what's up

They’re now talking about forcing doctors to accept medicare and medicaid patients. The AMA supported obamacare. I know that’s only 22% of the doctors but the other 78% weren’t very vocal in their opposition. So they’re all regretting it now.


17 posted on 12/12/2013 7:20:27 PM PST by VerySadAmerican (".....Barrack, and the horse Mohammed rode in on.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: VerySadAmerican
other 78% weren’t very vocal in their opposition

There's a group in CA who represent 38,000 doctors. They are becoming more and more outspoken in their opposition to O care. 70% of doctors in CA are NOT participating in the exchange.

CA will be interesting to watch. They tout the website in CA as exceptionally successful (probably because they got Silicon Valley's input in designing it). But ACA itself is not popular and if crumbles in CA it will crumble in the rest of the nation.

18 posted on 12/12/2013 7:24:44 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
"The administration strongly encouraged insurance companies to let new subscribers go outside their networks of doctors and hospitals and refill prescriptions for drugs not on their lists of approved medications. "

Unbelievable! They pass laws changing the rules on these companies, give them a short time to comply, and then put public pressure on them to act in a way that is not in their own self interest.

This is clearly statism. It's unconstitutional in many ways.

19 posted on 12/12/2013 7:26:18 PM PST by MV=PY (The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
This reminds me of the '08 crash which happened because Gov't was pushing banks to issue loans to people who couldn't afford to pay them back.

Now the Gov't is pushing insurance companies to do the same thing.

20 posted on 12/12/2013 7:34:29 PM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson