Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lured by Cheap Coal, Southeast Asia Turns Away from Gas
Reuters via Rig Zone ^ | December 09, 2013 | Jacob Gronholt-Pedersen

Posted on 12/11/2013 5:47:52 AM PST by thackney

Southeast Asia's power sector will tilt away from gas to use more coal by the end of this decade, chipping away at demand for liquefied natural gas as the region of more than 600 million people tries to cut costs to meet soaring electricity needs.

With a wave of LNG projects due to come online this decade, this shift in consumption from a region long expected to be a key growth market could help take some of the heat out of rising Asian prices of the cleaner fuel.

Gas prices in Asia are about five times more expensive than in the United States, driven by demand for LNG from countries such as Japan and South Korea - whose nuclear power sectors are in crisis, and China, where stringent pollution control measures are driving a switch from dirtier coal.

Demand for more coal could also help lift flagging prices of the fuel by at least partially compensating for China's move to cleaner energy sources.

Currently coal accounts for a third of Southeast Asia's energy mix and gas for 44 percent, with the bulk supplied by the region's own gas reserves, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA), which formulates energy policy for industrialised countries.

"People in this region keep talking about green growth, but when I look at the numbers, the growth is not green. It is black as coal," said Fatih Birol, the IEA's chief economist.

Power generation capacity in Southeast Asia is set to rise by 50 percent during the current decade, of which more than half will be coal-fired and only about a quarter will be gas-fired, the IEA said, indicating slow growth in LNG imports.

(Excerpt) Read more at rigzone.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: coal; energy; naturalgas
excerpt for Reuters content
1 posted on 12/11/2013 5:47:52 AM PST by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

Take that, Algore!


2 posted on 12/11/2013 5:49:36 AM PST by PATRIOT1876
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Reliable cheap electricity is an absolute requirement to alleviate miserable poverty and to ensure political stability. Coal is the only pragmatic way to generate that electricity in most of Asia. If Greenpeace takes its act to China to protest coal, their recent experience in Russia will seem like an after school detention after they deal with the Chinese.


3 posted on 12/11/2013 5:55:47 AM PST by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: allendale

What kind of quality is available in SE Asia coal reserves ?


4 posted on 12/11/2013 6:10:09 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks ("Say Not the Struggle Naught Availeth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Just how can we convince them that Ethanol will save their souls?

Americans bought the idea.


5 posted on 12/11/2013 6:11:16 AM PST by hadaclueonce (Because Brawndo's got electrolytes. Because Ethanol has Big Corn Lobby)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
think of all that coal; the 'Rats, said we couldn't use.. export it, jobs too.

6 posted on 12/11/2013 6:13:08 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun..0'Caligula / 0'Reid / 0'Pelosi :-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Chinese coal mines are working to capacity and many are very unsafe. The Chinese import huge amounts of coal,much of it from Australia and the amount despite the pollution will only increase. The Chinese have made a huge on paper “commitment” to nuclear energy but thus far they have not been able to open new nuclear facilities. The scarcity of trained experienced personnel is a huge bottleneck.


7 posted on 12/11/2013 6:25:50 AM PST by allendale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

As expected the quality varies from region to region. A softer brown coal is available as well as better quality coking coal. It is the latter that is sought after by industry.

Wikipedia search, coal quality south east asia.


8 posted on 12/11/2013 6:29:29 AM PST by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: count-your-change

I’ve read that Indonesian coal is high quality (low sulfur, high BTUs.)


9 posted on 12/11/2013 6:31:22 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks ("Say Not the Struggle Naught Availeth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: allendale
I remember when a Kentucky based coal company agreed to design a mine plan for a large Chinese surface reserve. The plan called for large draglines, with a single operator and two oilers in each machine.
The Chinese thought that was great, except they had 15 operators and 40 or 50 men with grease guns...
10 posted on 12/11/2013 6:37:36 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks ("Say Not the Struggle Naught Availeth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Yes, For certain poor countries need coal however messy it can be.


11 posted on 12/11/2013 6:41:07 AM PST by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Power generation capacity in Southeast Asia is set to rise by 50 percent during the current decade.

Now that's the old "can-do" attitude that we used to have. In the same decade, Obama will continue shutting down our coal-fired plants and will build more eagle-choppers.

12 posted on 12/11/2013 6:43:17 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Wonder if this [thread you posted the other day] is part of their plan for cheaper fuel?


Mammoth mining tool takes overnight ride through Texas
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3098182/posts


13 posted on 12/11/2013 6:48:51 AM PST by Arrowhead1952 (The Second Amendment is NOT about the right to hunt. It IS a right to shoot tyrants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Dump regulation on our coal industry, make it impractical to burn here, and coal producers will fire-sale their product at bargain basement prices to places in the world where they have ZERO emission controls.

Boy, that was sure helpful!

If you really care about the planet, educate yourself in market economics, please!


14 posted on 12/11/2013 6:53:47 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

They must also have shale reserves.

They should pursue that and skip coal.

What is this, the Victorian era?

Their pollution drifts here and settles in our valleys. In Denver, 80% of our brown winter haze is from outside Denver.


15 posted on 12/11/2013 7:02:09 AM PST by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney
They call it “global” when criticizing the overall result - but they want the US to take sole responsibility for that result.

China is building dozens of coal-fired power plants, and we’re supposed to believe that China is cutting back on its carbon footprint? I don’t think so.

16 posted on 12/11/2013 8:09:16 AM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion ("Liberalism” is a conspiracy against the public by wire-service journalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson