Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Special Report: China's navy breaks out to the high seas
Reuters ^ | Wed Nov 27, 2013 | DAVID LAGUE

Posted on 11/27/2013 10:43:46 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 11/27/2013 10:43:46 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

2 posted on 11/27/2013 10:45:00 AM PST by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
No sweat. Japan, India and a dozen lesser countries China threatens will now commence to building their naval capabilities as well.

China can devote its GDP to keeping pace.

3 posted on 11/27/2013 10:54:00 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

4 posted on 11/27/2013 10:54:54 AM PST by New Perspective (Proud father of a 9 yr old son with Down Syndrome and fighting to keep him off Obama's death panels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
Sink Me (in Chinese?)

5 posted on 11/27/2013 10:56:20 AM PST by skinkinthegrass (The end move in politics is always to pick up a gun..0'Caligula / 0'Reid / 0'Pelosi 8-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: New Perspective

(No MSG)...............


6 posted on 11/27/2013 10:56:36 AM PST by Red Badger (Proud member of the Zeta Omicron Tau Fraternity since 2004...................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

While the chickenhawk neo-cons keep pecking that our greatest enemy is Iran while China amasses greater power.


7 posted on 11/27/2013 11:02:15 AM PST by ex-snook (God is Love)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

The upside of the new Chinese navy is that it saves the US and Japan on having to buy practice targets.


8 posted on 11/27/2013 11:04:00 AM PST by MeganC (Support Matt Bevin to oust Mitch McConnell! https://mattbevin.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Here ya go.


9 posted on 11/27/2013 11:08:17 AM PST by New Perspective (Proud father of a 9 yr old son with Down Syndrome and fighting to keep him off Obama's death panels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
 photo chinesecarriersoapcopy_zps08b3ba64.jpg

10 posted on 11/27/2013 11:17:40 AM PST by Dick Bachert (Ignorance is NOT BLISS. It is the ROAD TO SERFDOM! We're on a ROAD TRIP!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Already happening. India will have three carriers (first being exGoshkov, the other two locally built) by 2025 and Japan will probably have at least four F-35B capable “helicopter destroyers”. The South Koreans and Aussies will have two similar ships each as well.

This war game strikes me as a classic choke point breakout exercise. I’m guessing it was VERY closely monitored by us, the Taiwanese, Japanese and South Koreans. Telling us a heck of a lot more about ChiCom strategy and tactics than they probably wanted us to know. Remember that the USN used a couple war games (Fleet Problems) in the 20s and 30s to show the possibilities of a Sunday dawn attack on ... Pearl Harbor. Something that a Japanese naval officer named Isoruku Yamamoto (amongst others) studied at great length.


11 posted on 11/27/2013 11:23:59 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

They demonstrated they can break out, now all they need is to figure out how to break back in. They have no tenable offshore base.


12 posted on 11/27/2013 11:30:29 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

+1

And what’s the purpose of their breakout? To control the sea lanes, or to deny control to others. Denial being much easier to achieve than control.

The Pacific sea lanes are crucial from a economic standpoint, but no so much from a military one. This isn’t the 1970s or 80s when a successful Soviet breakout from the GIUK Gap would endanger our ability to do a REFORGER in the event of a general war.

These days the ChiComs need those sea lanes open much, if not more, than we do.


13 posted on 11/27/2013 11:39:04 AM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook
While the chickenhawk neo-cons keep pecking that our greatest enemy is Iran while China amasses greater power.

Yep. Iran has no capability seriously harm the US. China DOES.

14 posted on 11/27/2013 11:46:22 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: skeeter
They have no tenable offshore base.

Bears repeating, in bold font. What are they going to do far from home, when blocked by allied forces in the Pacific? China is a long way from being a major naval threat.

15 posted on 11/27/2013 11:48:37 AM PST by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: New Perspective

Those props make that a death trap.


16 posted on 11/27/2013 1:02:14 PM PST by LibLieSlayer (FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS! BETTER DEAD THAN RED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

Not to mention Vietnam U-boats alone are able to contain Chicom Navy at this point.


17 posted on 11/27/2013 5:13:28 PM PST by cunning_fish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: New Perspective

Those two jets on the rear, sorry I’m army, are they balsa wood or what.

From what I’ve read, their jets haven’t made carrier landings yet.


18 posted on 11/27/2013 7:10:58 PM PST by rbmillerjr (Ted Cruz...2016-24 ...A New Conservative Era)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Is that how Harbor Freight is spelled in Chinese?


19 posted on 11/27/2013 7:15:11 PM PST by Rebelbase (Tagline: optional, printed after your name on post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: rbmillerjr

My mistake in post 18. I was thinking of the newest Chinese J31 I think, that hasn’t had successful carrier landings yet.


20 posted on 11/27/2013 7:57:40 PM PST by rbmillerjr (Ted Cruz...2016-24 ...A New Conservative Era)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson