Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jane Long
What part of seize says there will be payment?

The most left-leaning candidate for City Council speaker says she would consider using eminent domain to seize homes that are in foreclosure from banks – a move that could leave taxpayers subsidizing the mortgages.

Without payment to the bank, no subsidy is necessary - it would be a straight transfer from bank to mortgager. Besides, eminent domain *always* requires a market price payment - the only issue is how the market price is determined. What is in contention with most eminent domain cases is that holdouts think the property is undervalued at the current market price. In many and perhaps the majority of cases, the holdouts are right.

35 posted on 11/15/2013 4:30:17 PM PST by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: Zhang Fei
My mistake -- that IS a bank bailout, then...compliments of the taxpayers.

The last one out of NYC, turn the lights out.

37 posted on 11/15/2013 4:33:52 PM PST by Jane Long (While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs assist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson