To: El Cid
Actually the Primaries are pretty rigged as they are -- they start out with fairly liberal States, and some States even have 'open primaries' where 'progressive-socialists' can cross over and vote for their favorite left leaning Republican (and then vote against him/her in the primary).
My state Republican primary is so late in the spring that the nominee was already determined weeks in advance. Thus, the state presidential primary is irrelevant.
There should be maybe 3 or 4 primary dates 2 to 3 weeks apart and approximately equal in the number of delegate numbers.
34 posted on
11/04/2013 6:14:50 PM PST by
TomGuy
(.)
To: TomGuy
There should be maybe 3 or 4 primary dates 2 to 3 weeks apart and approximately equal in the number of delegate numbers. There should be a nationwide runoff primary, as many primaries as it takes for somebody to get 50% of the vote.
37 posted on
11/04/2013 6:16:44 PM PST by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Who knew that one day professional wrestling would be less fake than professional journalism?)
To: TomGuy
Agree.
Our primaries should be not starting in liberal states nor should they allow non republicans to vote like liberals, non party and liberaltarians.
54 posted on
11/04/2013 6:32:42 PM PST by
manc
(Marriage =1 man + 1 woman,when they say marriage equality then they should support polygamy)
To: TomGuy
I have been saying that for years. By the time I get to vote in the primaries all my horses are out. All primaries need to be with 60 days of each other and rotate who goes first. Dump NH, IA, and SC hold on these spots.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson