Posted on 11/03/2013 9:52:49 AM PST by jazusamo
There is widespread fury at the lies which were used to sell ObamaCare, a more than 2,000-page piece of legislation no one read before it was passed, a law opposed by the majority of voters which was crammed down our throats without a single Republican vote. The law essentially was a mishmash blank slate which left it to the administration's HHS head, Secretary Kathleen Sebelius to write as she pleased and the president to -- by Executive order -- pay off with exemptions and special treatment those cronies and rent seekers not already paid off in the legislative and regulatory process.
Whether this law will continue to pass judicial scrutiny remains to be seen, but what is obvious at this early date is that the press and the public figures who promoted it are lying low as the tsunami of voter rage builds.
If your only source of news is the major media, here are some facts they've kept from you:
1. Since July 2010 the Administration knew that at a minimum 40-67% of private health insurance owners would not be able to keep their insurance.
NBC's Lisa Myers broke the story, but both on air and in its published account NBC went to great lengths to bury her account of events that makes the president's repeated pre-election promise that if you liked your insurance you'd be able to keep it an outrageous bald-faced lie.
Here was her original report:
President Obama repeatedly assured Americans that after the Affordable Care Act became law, people who liked their health insurance would be able to keep it. But millions of Americans are getting or are about to get cancellation letters for their health insurance under Obamacare, say experts, and the Obama administration has known that for at least three years.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Definition of FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION:
Instance of false statement where (1) the party making the statement is aware that it is false or disregards the possibility of it being false, (2) the party making the statement does so to induce another party to enter into a contract, and (3) the other party enters the contract as a result of the statement and consequently suffers a loss.
Fraudulent misrepresentation occurs when one makes representation with INTENT TO DECEIVE and with the knowledge that it is false. An action for fraudulent misrepresentation allows for a remedy of damages and rescission. One can also sue for fraudulent misrepresentation in a tort action. Fraudulent misrepresentation is capable of being made recklessly.
So, when is class action lawsuit going to be filed against King Barry for FRAUDULENT MISREPRESENTATION or 'BAIT AND SWITCH"????
I don’t envy your holiday. Maybe best to have a back-up plan — unless you are hosting - as then there is no escape.
Lying ain’t no way to govern.
Though you’re correct I won’t hold my breath for a suit to be filed, I do think it may be reflected in the 2014 vote.
I am so looking forward to what 0bama will have to say if our majority increases in the House and we should take the Senate. That will be payback.
Amen to that.
You and I have the same Thanksgiving dinner. But I refuse to discuss politics with anyone at that dinner. I simply repeat “I disagree” over and over. Never argue with a leftist relative over Thanksgiving. Just turn on the football and keep it stupid.
The “New Yorker” cover was PRICELESS!
Personally, I think those who voted for obama should be FORCED onto obamacare.
Section 4. Method of Disclosure of Required Information
All information, exceptions, limitations, reductions and other restrictions required to be disclosed by this regulation shall be set out conspicuously and in close conjunction to the statements to which the information relates or under appropriate captions of such prominence that it shall not be minimized, rendered obscure or presented in an ambiguous fashion or intermingled with the context of the advertisements so as to be confusing or misleading. This regulation permits, but is not limited to, the use of either of the following methods of disclosure:
A. Disclosure in the description of the related benefits or in a paragraph set out in close conjunction with the description of policy benefits; or
B. Disclosure not in conjunction with the provisions describing policy benefits but under appropriate captions of such prominence that the information shall not be minimized, rendered obscure or otherwise made to appear unimportant. The phrase “under appropriate captions” means that the title must be accurately descriptive of the captioned material. Appropriate captions include the following: “Exceptions,” “Exclusions,” “Conditions Not Covered,” and “Exceptions and Reductions.” The use of captions such as the following are prohibited because they do not provide adequate notice of the significance of the material: “Extent of Coverage,” “Only these Exclusions,” or “Minimum Limitations.”
Drafting Note: In considering whether an advertisement complies with the disclosure requirements of this regulation, the regulation must be applied in conjunction with the form and content standards contained in Section 5.
Section 5. Form and Content of Advertisements
A. The format and content of an advertisement of an accident or sickness insurance policy shall be sufficiently complete and clear to avoid deception or the capacity or tendency to mislead or deceive. Format means the arrangement of the text and the captions.
B. Distinctly different advertisements are required for publication in different media, such as newspapers or magazines of general circulation as compared to scholarly, technical or business journals and newspapers. Where an advertisement consists of more than one piece of material, each piece of material must, independent of all other pieces of material, conform to the disclosure requirements of this regulation.
C. Whether an advertisement has a capacity or tendency to mislead or deceive shall be determined by the commissioner from the overall impression that the advertisement may be reasonably expected to create within the segment of the public to which it is directed.
Advertisements of Accident and Sickness Insurance Model Regulation
Drafting Note: These subsections must be applied in conjunction with Sections 1 and 4. These subsections refer specifically to format and content of the advertisement and the overall impression created by the advertisement. This involves factors such as the size, color and prominence of type used to describe benefits.
D. Advertisements shall be truthful and not misleading in fact or in implication. Words or phrases, the meaning of which is clear only by implication or by familiarity with insurance terminology, shall not be used.
Drafting Note: This subsection prohibits the use of incomplete statements and words or phrases that have the tendency or capacity to mislead or deceive because of the reader’s unfamiliarity with insurance terminology. Therefore, words, phrases and illustrations used in an advertisement must be clear and unambiguous and, if the advertisement uses insurance terminology, sufficient description of a word, phrase or illustration shall be provided by definition or description in the context of the advertisement. As stated in Subsection C, distinctly different levels of comprehension of the subscribers of various publications may be anticipated.
E. An insurer shall clearly identify its accident and sickness insurance policy as an insurance policy. A policy trade name shall be followed by the words “insurance policy” or similar words clearly identifying the fact that an insurance policy or health benefits product (in the case of health maintenance organizations, prepaid health plans and other direct service organizations) is being offered.
F. An insurer, agent, broker, producer, solicitor or other person shall not solicit a resident of this state for the purchase of accident and sickness insurance in connection with or as the result of the use of advertisement by the person or any other persons, where the advertisement:
(1) Contains any misleading representations or misrepresentations, or is otherwise untrue, deceptive or misleading with regard to the information imparted, the status, character or representative capacity of the person or the true purpose of the advertisement; or
(2) Otherwise violates the provisions of this regulation.
G. An insurer, agent, broker, producer, solicitor or other person shall not solicit residents of this State for the purchase of accident and sickness insurance through the use of a true or fictitious name that is deceptive or misleading with regard to the status, character or proprietary or representative capacity of the person or the true purpose of the advertisement.
Section 6. Advertisements of Benefits Payable, Losses Covered or Premiums Payable
A. Covered Benefits.
(1) The use of deceptive words, phrases or illustrations in advertisements of accident and sickness insurance is prohibited.
Drafting Note: This broad provision may be deleted if your state has enacted an Unfair Trade Practices Act that contains the same prohibitions.
(2) An advertisement that fails to state clearly the type of insurance coverage being offered is prohibited.
Model Regulation Service—April 1999
(3) An advertisement shall not omit information or use words, phrases, statements, references or illustrations if the omission of information or use of words, phrases, statements, references or illustrations has the capacity, tendency or effect of misleading or deceiving purchasers or prospective purchasers as to the nature or extent of any policy benefit payable, loss covered or premium payable. The fact that the policy offered is made available to a prospective insured for inspection prior to consummation of the sale or an offer is made to refund the premium if the purchaser is not satisfied, does not remedy misleading statements.
(4) An advertisement shall not contain or use words or phrases such as “all,” “full,” “complete,” “comprehensive,” “unlimited,” “up to,” “as high as,” “this policy will help fill some of the gaps that Medicare and your present insurance leave out,” “the policy will help to replace your income,” (when used to express loss of time benefits), or similar words and phrases, in a manner that exaggerates a benefit beyond the terms of the policy.
Drafting Note: An advertisement shall not state or imply by word, phrase or illustration that the benefits being offered will supplement any other insurance policy, health benefit plan, or governmental plan if that is not the fact.
(5) An advertisement of a hospital or other similar facility confinement benefit that makes reference to the benefit being paid directly to the policyholder is prohibited unless, in making the reference, the advertisement includes a statement that the benefits may be paid directly to the hospital or other health care facility if an assignment of benefits is made by the policyholder. An advertisement of medical and surgical expense benefits shall comply with this regulation in regard to the disclosure of assignments of benefits to providers of services. Phrases such as “you collect,” “you get paid,” “pays you,” or other words or phrases of similar import may be used so long as the advertisement indicates that it is payable to the insured or someone designated by the insured.
(6) (a) An advertisement for basic hospital expense coverage, basic medical-surgical expense coverage, basic hospital/medical-surgical expense coverage, hospital confinement indemnity coverage, accident only coverage, specified disease coverage, specified accident coverage or limited benefit health coverage or for coverage that covers only a certain type of loss is prohibited if:
(i) The advertisement refers to a total benefit maximum limit payable under the policy in any headline, lead-in or caption without also in the same headline, lead-in or caption specifying the applicable daily limits and other internal limits;
(ii) The advertisement states a total benefit limit without stating the periodic benefit payment, if any, and the length of time the periodic benefit would be payable to reach the total benefit limit; or
Advertisements of Accident and Sickness Insurance Model Regulation
(iii) The advertisement prominently displays a total benefit limit that would not, as a general rule, be payable under an average claim.
(b) This paragraph does not apply to individual major medical expense coverage, individual basic medical expense coverage, or disability income insurance.
(7) Advertisements that emphasize total amounts payable under hospital, medical or surgical accident and sickness insurance coverage or other benefits in a policy, such as benefits for private duty nursing, are prohibited unless the actual amounts payable per day for the indemnity or benefits are stated.
(8) Advertisements that include examples of benefits payable under a policy shall not use examples in a way that implies that the maximum payable benefit payable under the policy will be paid, when less than maximum benefits are paid in an average claim.
(9) When a range of benefit levels is set forth in an advertisement, it shall be clear that the insured will receive only the benefit level written or printed in the policy selected and issued. Language that implies that the insured may select the benefit level at the time of filing claims is prohibited.
(10) Language in an advertisement that implies that the amount of benefits payable under a loss-of-time policy may be increased at the time of claim or disability according to the needs of the insured is prohibited.
(11) Advertisements for policies with premiums that are modest because of their limited coverage or limited amount of benefits shall not describe premiums as “low,” “low cost,” “budget” or use qualifying words of similar import. The use of words such as “only” and “just” in conjunction with statements of premium amounts when used to imply a bargain are prohibited.
(12) Advertisements that state or imply that premiums will not be changed in the future are prohibited unless the advertised policies expressly provide that the premiums will not be changed in the future.
(13) An advertisement for a policy that does not require the premium to accompany the application shall not overemphasize that fact and shall clearly indicate under what circumstances coverage will become effective.
(14) An advertisement that exaggerates the effects of statutorily mandated benefits or required policy provisions or that implies that the provisions are unique to the advertised policy is prohibited.
Drafting Note: For example, the phrase, “money back guarantee” is an exaggerated description of the free look right to examine the policy and is prohibited.
(15) An advertisement that implies that a common type of policy or a combination of common benefits is “new,” “unique,” “a bonus,” “a breakthrough,” or is otherwise unusual is prohibited. The addition of a novel method of premium payment to an otherwise common plan of insurance does not render it new.
Model Regulation Service—April 1999
(16) Language in an advertisement that states or implies that each member under a family contract is covered as to the maximum benefits advertised, where that is not the fact, is prohibited.
(17) An advertisement that contains statements such as “anyone can apply,” or “anyone can join,” other than with respect to a guaranteed issue policy for which administrative procedures exist to assure that the policy is issued within a reasonable period of time after the application is received by the insurer, is prohibited.
(18) An advertisement that states or implies immediate coverage of a policy is prohibited unless administrative procedures exist so that the policy is issued within fifteen (15) working days after the insurer receives the completed application.
(19) An advertisement that contains statements such as “here is all you do to apply,” or “simply” or “merely” to refer to the act of applying for a policy that is not a guaranteed issue policy is prohibited unless it refers to the fact that the application is subject to acceptance or approval by the insurer.
(20) An advertisement of accident and sickness insurance sold by direct response shall not state or imply that because no insurance agent will call and no commissions will be paid to agents that it is a low cost plan, or use other similar words or phrases because the cost of advertising and servicing the policies is a substantial cost in the marketing by direct response.
(21) Applications, request forms for additional information and similar related materials are prohibited if they resemble paper currency, bonds, stock certificates, etc., or use any name, service mark, slogan, symbol or device in a manner that implies that the insurer or the policy advertised is connected with a government agency, such as the Social Security Administration or the Department of Health and Human Services.
Drafting Note: Illustrations that depict paper currency or checks showing an amount payable are deceptive and misleading.
(22) An advertisement that implies in any manner that the prospective insured may realize a profit from obtaining hospital, medical or surgical insurance coverage is prohibited.
(23) An advertisement that uses words such as “extra,” “special” or “added” to describe a benefit in the policy is prohibited. No advertisement of a benefit for which payment is conditioned upon confinement in a hospital or similar facility shall use words or phrases such as “tax-free,” “extra cash,” “extra income,” “extra pay,” or substantially similar words or phrases because these words and phrases have the capacity, tendency or effect of misleading the public into believing that the policy advertised will, in some way, enable them to make a profit from being hospitalized.
I agree. Or anyone else.
Well, the true believers are glad to give more so the poor can have; perhaps those types will be martyrs about it, given the Lib propensity for self-righteousness. Also, another reason why it doesn’t matter if the site works or not is intentions. Intentions are all that matter in Libworld.
Complicit media.. I guess they didn’t want to lose their invitations to the WH for easter egg hunts and pin the tail on the TEA Party events.
Chumps.Enjoy your BMWs and Benz,, CUba , here we come..
First they came for the Tea Party...
The same silence when their messiah failed miserably securing Chicago for the Olympics or the respect of Putin after telling us the world loves liberal Americans.
Um, I went over there. Those people are literally INSANE.
No Simple Se-bilious did not write it, the evil minded brother of Rahm Emmanuel wrote the monstrosity
doctors are part of the problem, getting rich off outrageous prices paid by insurance companies for popular “procedures”
You agree with the President, then? Doctors recommend and conduct unnecessary amputations so as to profit.
Have you ever seen a surgeon's bill -- or, for that matter, a bill for any procedure -- as submitted to an insurance company? Or Medicare? Are you aware of the relationship between what is billed and what is actually paid?
Obviously, you have not.
Agree with your post.
I had a 60 grand surgery last year for cancer.
The knife man got about 3 grand.
Hospital is where all the costs are.
Was surprised that the guy who really had “skin in the game” got such a small amount.
bushbuddy, you should write down CJ’s stock liberal replies and date it and stick it in you pocket. When the reply come, pull out the paper and show your relatives that you predicted t responses. That’ll really get under their skins:-)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.