Posted on 10/30/2013 3:39:37 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
I had a familiar feeling at my first tea party rally. It was a sunny spring afternoon and Boston Common was packed with people passionate for change, excited to hear Sarah Palin speak and having a great time.
It brought me back to my first political rallies, those glorious gatherings devoted to stopping the Vietnam War and demanding racial justice. How thrilling it felt to be surrounded by thousands of people who shared our commitment, joining their voices to demand new policies.
We had flags with peace signs on them. The tea partiers had flags with coiled snakes. We shook our clenched fists in defiance. They shouted "Don't Tread on Me." We mocked Richard Nixon. They ridiculed Barack Obama.
Four years later, I still see similarities between the New Left and the Tea Party Right, but they are darker. These last few weeks have been no day in the park. Body type J: Political movements are seductive for those who yearn to believe. They can wrap anger in nobility and resentment in solidarity. In the sunny fellowship of the protest rally, it feels like the whole world agrees with you.
Movements reinforce their messages by cutting out others. In the ‘60s, we said "don't trust anyone over 30." The tea partiers say "don't trust the mainstream media." Such sentiments make it easier for activists to become disconnected from ordinary Americans and for their movement to go off the rails.
Grassroots movements are easily pulled to extremes by their own enthusiasms and the arguments of their media cheerleaders. Narrow issues become broader critiques of the status quo. Recruits may go into it intending to fix a problem, but later find themselves advocating the overthrow of the government. People get radicalized, especially when change doesn't come quickly enough.
In the 60s and 70s, I watched anti-war liberals grow into anti-government radicals. They resented the liberals - especially liberal Democratic politicians - who wanted the young protesters to cut their hair and clean up their language. "Compromise" became a dirty word. To the radicals, the Vietnam War was just the tip of the iceberg. Underneath lurked a corrupt system rotten to the core, one that was bound to fall. The idea that they might help push it over the edge was exhilarating.
For the tea party's hard core, getting rid of Obama and Obamacare is just the beginning. Even undoing the New Deal isn't enough; they'd like to undo the Progressive Era as well.
Radicals yearn for the cataclysm that will turn the corrupt status quo upside down. I remember academic radicals in Berkeley and Harvard Square saying "the worse things are, the better they are," because political or economic disasters would push the country toward the revolution they sought.
I heard echoes of that this week as the federal government approached the debt ceiling. Bring on the default, let the economy crash, then people will see that America has no choice but to turn its back on these policies and follow our vision.
But ordinary Americans don't want a revolution. They want jobs, safety for their families, a little money in their pockets at the end of the week. They don't want politicians or revolutionaries shutting down the national parks they planned to visit. They don't want their pension checks delayed or their meals-on-wheels not delivered.
The jokers in Washington constantly describe their priorities as "what the American people want." But what ordinary people want is for Washington to stop screwing up their lives with phony crises. To them, the worse things are, the worse things are. If the nation's top politicians can't make things better, at least stop making them worse.
There are differences between the New Left of 40 years ago and today's Tea Party Right. While a few Democratic hawks in Congress faced primary challenges, the New Left didn't put much stock in elections, and didn't have big-money backers pushing their agenda. Nor did they have a well-developed network of radio talk hosts and a leading cable news channel making their case.
The New Left was deftly demonized by the Nixon administration. Vice President Spiro Agnew coined the term "radical-liberal" to tie respectable mainstream Democrats to the scary extremists. It worked. Democrats were hobbled for a generation by their association with the hippie-peacenik-radicals of the far left.
Does a similar fate await the Republican Party? Will the overheated rhetoric and destructive tactics of the tea party faction further discredit a party already facing demographic challenges? It's too soon to tell, but if Republican leaders in Congress can't wrest control of their party's messaging and tactics away from the radicals, it could be a long time before the GOP can win a national campaign.
Well, duh. The American parties have been led away by the Communist movement.
Time to clean house.
I think he has it wrong. Just the opposite....if the TEA Party doesn’t wrest the power away from the GOP, we won’t win any elections ever.
They do lead parties astray, especially the UniParty, and that’s a good thing.
Was this really written by Karl Rove?
But isn't this pretty much what the Tea Party is all about? This joker can write about the movement and not get this basic point? He's a hack.
The writer is a perfect example of a do-gooder liberal, whose efforts end up on the shitpile of history.
All those protests he liked over Vietnam left about (in 1975), 20 million people in communist slavery, hundreds of thousands executed, starved to death, or killed by disease in Hanoi’s gulags in SVN, Laos and Cambodia. Another half million may have perished at sea escaping the “socialist paradises” in those countries.
Never a protest over Castro’s communist Cuba.
While the Leftist marxists wanted to overthrow the government of the US, the Tea Party movement wants to get back the one that represents the “people”, not one that rules by intimidation, regulation, IRS harassment/inaction, and “bills you’ve got to pass before you can read them”.
Actually, Nancy Pelosi revealed his marxist side when she said that before in communist countries, election results are revealed before the elections are held. Same thing.
Well, at least we know that the writer is a typical liberal loser and that Pelosi is California Pink.
Won’t stop the Left from lying, deceiving and imposing their will on us, but it does explain a lot about them.
The only good commie...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.