What Is About To Happen To Earth? – ISON vs Nibiru – Trumpets Of Revelation

www.youtube.com ^ | Sunday, September 29, 2013 | Rev Michelle Hopkins

[winoneforthegipper]

yep that’s it.....!

[jpsb]

“asteroid miner as a career option"

Maybe but we need to find a much cheaper way to get into space. Space ladder anyone? I have not heard much about that lately.

[jpsb]

Sounds plausible, collisions with high energy particles emitted by the sun could certainly brake down ice/dust crystals. I would not argue against the possibility.

[winoneforthegipper]

now if you add up the tonnage that will be in path of earth as it slides through both ISON’s exit and entrance path then well....

That’s a lot of small debris..how will out atmosphere react to it and will it have effects similar to what a volcanic dry fog?

That is my take.

[ElkGroveDan]

So you don't believe that the Solar Winds would cause the debris trail to swirl behind its inbound path?
Swirl? No. stream off along a known vector the way EVERY OTHER COMET does, yes.

So you don't believe that such a close pass to Mars, that Mar's gravitational tug on Ison couldn't alter the orbit of Ison?
Yes, it of course it would, but it's not going to. Such motions don't happen by surprise. The motions of ISON as it approaches Mars and continues on have already been calculated. Nothing in the vacuum of space can change that motion.

So you don't believe that "a chaotic zone of dust and debris" is what makes up a comet's tail, or is left behind in the orbit path of a comet?
Yes, comets shed debris in the form of specs of dust and sublimating ices. They don't however "swirl along" picking up objects and debris as they go. You are envisioning motions and interactions that happen in air or water. In the vacuum of space there is no "swirling", or "dragging along." The motion isn't even that chaotic since in the near-vacuum of the comet's tail, particle interaction is minimal.

Then explain the Leonids and why they affect us every year.

The Leonids (and every other meteor shower) are caused when the Earth crosses the orbits of the sand and dust-sized particles left by Comet Temple-Tuttle during previous passes through the inner solar system. There is a ring of material left floating in space around our sun. The Earth passes through these rings of material roughly the same time every year. When the particles encounter the Earth's atmosphere they burn up and give off a flash of light as they do so. That's the only "effect" they have. The particles were certainly not drawn in by Temple-Tuttle by way of "dragging" or "swirling" through the asteroid belt. Most importantly, none of this is ever a mystery or a surprise, the motions of comets are never unknown, nor do the motions "change" at the last moment.

[Cvengr]

Don’t forget, the Muslim flag with a crescent and star really depict a partial eclipse of Nibiru and the moon, behind which it has been hidden as it approaches us.

[Cvengr]

Yes, and everybody knows there’s Global Warming, because Al Gore said so. /s

[Stingray]

“That’s not a reference to the terrestrial sphere.”

“Says WHO ?”

Moses. You can start with Leviticus: key words “Sky” and “Land.”

[EEGator]

It’s okay though, the Pleiadians will save us from the aliens of Nibiru.

[coon2000]

99% of the mass of our solar system is the Sun. A comet would be like a speck of dust landing on your body.

[RansomOttawa]

Now what are your thoughts?

Nibiru, which doesn't exist, was supposed to kill us all over 10 years ago. Anyone who says it's still out there isn't worth taking seriously.

[Windflier]

Ison just might crash into the Sun, and if there's a large amount of IRON inside Comet Ison, then how would that affect the Sun's solar activity?

The sun is a million miles across. Something as small as Comet Ison doesn't contain enough iron to set off the sort of chain reaction that would kill our star.

The sun has probably devoured trillions of such morsels during its lifetime with hardly a burp.

[Yosemitest]

I still have differences of opinion with your theory that

"They don't however "swirl along" picking up objects and debris as they go. "

The Leonids were generated from the Comet 55P/Tempel–Tuttlewhich

is estimated to have a nucleus of mass 1.2×10¹³ kg^[5] and radius 1.8 km^[5] and a stream of mass 5×10¹² kg.^[5]

Comet Tempel–Tuttle is expected to return on May 20, 2031 form it's orbital period of 33 years and was last seen Feb. 28, 1998.

QUESTION:How different is Comet Ison from Comet Temple-Tuttle in size ?

Here's what I've found on Comet Ison.

April update: Early indications from students who have been processing data from NASA’s Swift satellite, estimate the comet to be around 3 miles in diameter.
They have reached this conclusion by observing the amount of ice and dust emitted from ISON’s surface as it falls through space toward the Sun.

Now if I read things correctly, Comet Ison is larger than Comet Tempel–Tuttle.
Doesn't anything with mass have its own gravity, and therefore can "tug at" other bodies that have mass ?
If Comet Tempel–Tuttle left the Leonids in its trail, why can't Comet Ison do similarly ?
Where is your logic that allows one comet to do that, but not another LARGER comet ?

[Yosemitest]

My thought were that

if Comet Ison actually struck the body of the Sun, that the mass of Ison would probably be totally melted and blown out away from the body of the Sun.

But what if I'm wrong ?
But I'm not an Astrophysics Scientist.
Watch Why Does Iron Kills Stars .
Is this not a possibility, although it may not be very probable ?

[Vermont Lt]

But if I don’t have to worry about this...what will I worry about?

[ElkGroveDan]

I still have differences of opinion with your theory . . .

Well you go right ahead, except that it's not a theory. Comets and their motion through the solar system are EXTREMELY well understood. I'm just restating facts that have been proven and observed many thousands of times.

As for the gravity, yes all mass has gravity and pulls on everything else in the universe. But the forces involved are related to the masses of the objects divided by the inverse square of the distance between them. The comet does have a gravitational attraction but it is quite small and the farther you get from it the smaller the force becomes -- very quickly. Anything that could be swept up by a comet would have to be extremely close to it, and as has already been pointed out, the objects and particles in the asteroid belt are extremely far apart. The forces just aren't there to be "sweeping up" things other than the occasional dust particle that it impacts, let alone objects large enough to cause any effect on Earth -- assuming it were to pass close to Earth ---- WHICH IT WON'T.

[Ozark Tom]

The most obvious problem with ISON is that it is not a solid body but likely an aggregate mix of hailstones and gravel. The projected course takes it under the Roche limit distance at perihelion. Meaning my opinion is that it has a very good chance of breaking up into buckshot of unknown size and scattered along its exit vector.

[Yosemitest]

So you admit that, albeit "quiet small and very close", bodies could be "swept up" by Comet Ison.

NEXT QUESTION:

What is the likelihood of Comet Ison ( estimate the comet to be around 3 miles in diameter) being broken up by the Sun's gravitational forces, into several pieces as it slingshots around the Sun ?

Astronomers estimated that the original Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9 ( formally designated D/1993 F2 ) may have had a nucleus up to 5 km (3.1 mi) across .
Astronomers estimated that the visible fragments of SL9 ranged in size from a few hundred metres to two kilometres across.
21 distinct impacts were observed, with the largest coming on July 18 at 07:33 UTC when fragment G struck Jupiter.
This impact created a giant dark spot over 12,000 km across, and was estimated to have released an energy equivalent to 6,000,000 megatons of TNT (600 times the world's nuclear arsenal).^[17]

Now since Comet Ison is estimated to be on slightly smaller than Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9 was, WHY WOULDN'T THE DAMAGE (if it breaks up) BE ANY DIFFERENT ?
And if Comet Ison breaks up, can we expect its path to change, given the extra venting gases created by more surface areas to be heated up ?
And would the breaking up of Comet Ison speed up or slow down the shattered pieces velocity on its continued path out away from the Sun?
Or would it totally change the exit point in its slingshot around the Sun to widen the orbit out ?

[Yosemitest]

I found these videos that have very good information from the Deep Impact Discovery Mission to Comet Tempel 1 and I thought they might be worth our time.

1/6 Comets - Not What We Expected


2/6 Comets - Not What We Expected


3/6 Comets - Not What We Expected


4/6 Comets - Not What We Expected


5/6 Comets - Not What We Expected


6/6 Comets - Not What We Expected

[Yosemitest]

How would a crushed Comet Ison compare to the Tunguska event or the space rock that carved Meteor Crater in Arizona ?

The Tunguska event was an enormously powerful explosion that occurred near the Podkamennaya Tunguska River in what is now Krasnoyarsk Krai, Russia, at about 07:14 KRAT (00:14 UT) on June 30 [O.S. June 17], 1908.^[1][2][3]
The explosion, having the epicentre (60.886°N, 101.894°E), is believed to have been caused by the air burst of a small asteroid or comet at an altitude of 5–10 kilometres (3–6 mi) above Earth's surface.
Different studies have yielded widely varying estimates of the object's size, on the order of 60 m (200 ft) to 190 m (620 ft).^[4]
It is the largest impact event on or near Earth in recorded history.
(It is classified as an impact even though the asteroid or comet is believed to have burst in the air rather than hitting the surface.)^[5]

The space rock that carved Meteor Crater in Arizona -- 570 feet deep and 4,100 feet (1.25 kilometers) across -- was blown into existence 50,000 years ago by an asteroid roughly 130 feet (40 meters) wide.

So, IF Comet Ison breaks up like Comet Shoemaker–Levy 9 did,
WHY shouldn't we worry about the possibilities of the damage the rubble from Comet Ison could do to our World,
if not on this pass, then on the next return trip into our orbit (who know how many years from now) ?