Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MILLER: Justice delayed is justice denied - Appeal for decision on D.C.’s gun carry-rights ban
The Washington Times ^ | 23 October 2013 | Emily Miller

Posted on 10/24/2013 10:24:14 AM PDT by marktwain

The nation’s capital is the only place in America where no one is allowed to exercise his right to bear arms.

This is clearly unconstitutional, but the courts have thrown up repeated roadblocks to delay the law getting overturned for more than four years. The federal appeals court now will decide if this delay can continue.

SEE ALSO: MILLER: D.C. businessman faces two years in jail for unregistered ammunition, brass casing

On Tuesday, attorney Alan Gura petitioned for a writ of mandamus to the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia on behalf of the plaintiffs to force the district court judge to issue an opinion in the case Palmer v. District of Columbia.

This type of request is rare in the legal process.

“We’re not sure what else we’re supposed to do,” the lawyer representing the Second Amendment Foundation in the case told me in an interview. “It’s not a step we took casually, but we don’t wish to wait another four years.”

The appeals court can either deny it summarily or ask for a response from the District before holding arguments and then ruling.

George Lyon is one of the plaintiffs in the case and an attorney who lives in the District. He noted that Mr. Gura first tried to go to Judge Frederick J. Scullin directly by filing a motion to expedite the case.

“Mandamus was our only option because there is no other way to force the judge to make a decision,” said Mr. Lyon. “The lack of a decision places me at risk any time I leave my house without the most effective means available to protect myself, a right clearly spelled out in the Constitution.”

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist; dc; guncontrol; palmer; secondamendment
I may have had a small part to play in this article. I sent Emily a tip about this about six weeks ago. The article is all Emily's. If my blog helped her in any way, more power too you, Emily. I hope I can help in the future.
1 posted on 10/24/2013 10:24:14 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Sounds to Me like the zero is waiting to finish buying up all the rest of the ammo then tell the court to go ahead now because the firearms are nothing but a hammer without ammo.

If it was a case that was being prosecuted against a “serf” that had a firearm You can bet it would be in the Express Lane.

BTTT


2 posted on 10/24/2013 10:34:49 AM PDT by mabarker1 (Please, Somebody Impeach the kenyan!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

too should be to...

fast fingers, Thomas Jefferson spell checker..


3 posted on 10/24/2013 10:57:53 AM PDT by marktwain (The MSM must die for the Republic to live. Long live the new media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mabarker1

Of course they won’t use up “all the ammo.” That is lefty zero-sum-game thinking.

In fact they have probably been a blessing to armed America. Because they are encouraging ammo manufacturers to go full tilt. And just at the propitious time, too. Sure we don’t have tax money to buy that ammo with, but ammo manufacturers don’t care. Our earned money spends equally well.


4 posted on 10/24/2013 11:00:39 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (The Lion of Judah will roar again if you give him a big hug and a cheer and mean it. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
The appeals court can either deny it summarily or ask for a response from the District before holding arguments and then ruling.

Does anybody want to make a wager which direction the court is going to take? I have an idea, but I don't think anybody is going to want to cover my bet.

5 posted on 10/24/2013 11:05:55 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (We're At That Awkward Stage: It's too late to vote them out, too early to shoot the bastards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty
Does anybody want to make a wager which direction the court is going to take?

Which court, district or circuit? I think the district knows it must go with a plain reading of the 2nd Amendment, so they are refusing to issue an opinion.

6 posted on 10/25/2013 10:59:58 AM PDT by neverdem (Register pressure cookers! /s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I don’t know which court. The next one, whatever it is.


7 posted on 10/25/2013 11:27:39 AM PDT by Cyber Liberty (We're At That Awkward Stage: It's too late to vote them out, too early to shoot the bastards.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson