Posted on 10/09/2013 1:29:47 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
It’s something like talented spook-writer and lefty avatar Stephen King raving about guns: the automatic weapon capable of firing hundreds of rounds a second, or the revolver (most recently in “Dr. Sleep”, a Glock) that is being handled by the character like a live rattlesnake, but don’t worry: “The safety is on.”
I would not step 1/16th of an inch into the State. where is Gloria Allred when ya need her!
Ummmm, why not?
Anyone want to bet the idiot is talking about semi-auto.
******************************************
That’s a quote from the “law” ,, the law is an ass in this case ... if taken logically it is talking about the firearms rate of fire... since only a fully auto rifle has it’s own “rate of fire” it is a self defeating argument against any semi-auto ... my M1 for instance has a “rate of fire” averaging one shot every 3 months... since I just don’t go hunting that much.. then you go on to the clearly unconstitutional restriction based on intended use...
“A broad brush” - now that’s sexist.
Stephen King didn’t really say those things did he?
OOOOOO ... evil AR's. Good thing Kalifornistan LE can't see or do anything about what I have in my Arizona home. It would make them wee-wee their little faggot panties. FU with extreme prejudice you f'n Kalifornia pansies ... stay in Kalif and don't come to Arizona.
That is NOT directed towards any true conservative trapped in occupied Kalifornistan. My advise to you is ... get out while you can
Take it all the way to the Supreme Court and force these socialist states to stop infringing on the peoples’ right to keep and bear arms. Go Aldon.
Hey Aldon? Wanna be the most famous athlete in the NFL? Hire a good Constitutional lawyer and take this all the way. DEMAND YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!!!
District Attorney Jeff Rosen said... “Such weapons, as configured, cannot be legally purchased in Arizona by residents of California. “Ummmm, why not?”
OF COURSE those weapons can be legally purchased in Arizona by California residents. The Cali people just can’t take them back into their effeminate “state”.
I always keep my glock on “safety”
“A “.45-caliber handgun” is not an “assault weapon”. I hate these lazy liberal sportswriters.”
No but the rifles they found were classified as such by CA.
As someone else posted, and I’m sure you know, semi-auto weapons don’t have a “rate of fire” at all.
So just what is he talking about, and how would it ever hold up in a decent court if these are semi-auto rifles?
How will a court get past a defense exhibit of any other ordinary semi-auto gun and it’s “rate of fire”?
Unintended consequences of liberalism - another spoiled sports star takes a hit.
Because the operating theory is you’ll bring them home, where they’re illegal. Pretty SOP, a lot of gun shops even have signs saying they won’t sell to out of state residents because they don’t want to be involved in a sale where they know your intention is to break the law.
Sure, that’s the theory but this ass just made a blanket statement that said it is illegal for CA residents to buy this type of rifle out-of-state which is not true.
Gee, thanks for letting us know. But I just gotta ask,
Any way you stack it, Congress is worse.
Writing as awful as his is a greater threat to this country than any firearms.
In Pennsylvania the possession of these weapons incites a YAWN!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.