ping
First sentence: These reporters either don’t know the difference between “proselytism” and “evangelization,” or they are liars.
Would like to see context.
It’s good to see the comPost is doing its usual, level best to twist and obfuscate all things Catholic.
At least there’s some consistency in the world.
This is how I imagine American journalists ending a call with Obama:
‘I don’t know how to end this call and let myself go, saying: “Can I embrace you by phone?”’
But really, this is much about nothing and does show the ignorance (or I hope all that is all it is!) of the WaPost journalist. PF decries ‘prosyletism’, which as this post explains, has within the Church come to mean a bad, crass form of evangelism:
http://forums.catholic.com/showthread.php?t=610941
HERE is a more openly honest account of the interview:
How the Church Will Change: Evangelical Catholic Pope Francis Gives Another Interview
http://www.catholic.org/international/international_story.php?id=52593
Reading a Washpost column about the Pope is kinda like reading Dr. Seus on Ham Radio.
What did the Pope really say? (Here we go again...)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/3073621/posts