Posted on 09/24/2013 2:31:34 PM PDT by jazusamo
Displaying their ignorance of the U.S. Constitution, Democratic bigwigs are excoriating Republican members of the House of Representatives for attaching a condition — no Obamacare — to a stopgap bill to fund the government when the new fiscal year begins Oct. 1. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid called it "extortion". Sen. Steny Hoyer labeled it "hostage-taking". Representative Nancy Pelosi termed it "legislative arson".
In truth, what the House Republicans are doing is not blackmail. It's checks and balances in action. Congress has always had the power to attach almost any condition — including repealing or changing a law — to appropriations. The framers wrote the Constitution that way for good reason.
The nation's first plan of government, the Articles of Confederation, had no president. When the framers gathered in 1787 to write a second, more effective plan, they reluctantly created the presidency. Reluctantly, because the founders worried that a president would accumulate power and spend flagrantly as they had seen the despotic kings of Europe do.
To prevent that, the founders created checks and balances. In the words of James Madison, the Constitution's chief architect, each branch of government is "effectually checked and restrained by the others. "
Congress was given power over the purse — the power to appropriate money and to borrow it or raise it through taxes, because locating the power in Congress would force the president to constantly negotiate with Congress.
Fast-forward 226 years to last Friday. President Obama called Speaker of the House John Boehner to say, "he will not negotiate" with Congress on raising the U.S. government's borrowing authority. The president, who claims to be a constitutional scholar, needs a refresher course.
(Excerpt) Read more at creators.com ...
Liberals are narcissists. They can do things better. And they despise the law that maintains a civil society from the beginning.
To the headline: duh!
They have a new argument for obamacare (on twitter) the founding fathers would have supported it - hahahahahah!!!!
The anti-2nd Amendment liberal/progressives are the worst. When they rant that the 2nd Amendment is outdated and was written by “slave-owning white guys” ask them who do they think wrote the rest of the Bill of Rights. Or for that matter most of the rest of the constitution.
Yep...In a pigs behind the founding fathers would have supported it. LOL!
Bump...The libs think the Constitution should be what they want it to be.
BFD. So what if it is extortion. Using extortion to get rid of something put in place through bribery is wrong......why?
I hear you...and believe McCaughey did an excellent job of shooting down the Rats on that, she explained it simply and effectively.
bkmk
It actually is blackmail.
However the Constitution fully sanctions, even encourages blackmail. As the framers intended. Reading James Madison’s Federalist 58 spells this out with great clarity: the power of the purse was a weapon the framers deliberately put into the hands of the House of Reps for use against the Senate and other branches.
They’re like the atheists that argue about how “Separation of Church and state” is in the Constitution.
They need to fire up a circa 1963 Civics class filmstrip for the politicians so they can learn about Checks and Balances.
The president, who claims to be a constitutional scholar, needs a refresher course.
He needs to retake the course in depth and then stand a detailed examination.
Exactly...but being he never got it the first time he’d never get it the second time, we have an affirmative action idiot in the WH.
We have an affirmative action idiot in the WH now.
Every election I dram of putting Steny Hoyer out to pasture, but he has ingratiated himself with the entitlement set to a point that he continues to get sent back to Congress.
This clown has never worked a day in his life and sucked on the Government Tit for over 30 years, He is a well to do man with a large home on the Patuxent. He has done more than well with the paltry salary Congressmen receive.
In fact so well it is almost beyond belief that a Congressman’s salary could go so far.
Yes, there’s many congress critters that live high on the hog, well above their incomes, the Rats don’t have an exclusive on it but they sure outnumber Repubs.
Let’s start that conversation by acknowledging we aren’t going to deport 12 million illegal immigrants... bringing these workers out of the shadows and into being taxpaying members of society. Imagine 12 million people who are already here coming out of the shadows to become new taxpayers.12 million more people assimilating into society. 12 million more people being productive contributors. [but he’s not in favor of amnesty, snicker, definition of is is]
...by softening its edge on some volatile social issues and altering its image as the party always seemingly "eager to go to war... We do need to expand the party and grow the party and that does mean that we don't always all agree on every issue" ... the party needs to become more welcoming to individuals who disagree with basic Republican doctrine on emotional social issues such as gay marriage... "We're going to have to be a little hands off on some of these issues ... and get people into the party," Paul said.
Freep You Rand Paul (FURP)!!
Obama: I will not negotiate! Even if it shuts down the government! I am king.
Bump!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.