Posted on 09/07/2013 1:45:21 PM PDT by jazusamo
You could well be right and if so FNC will be making another big mistake.
Fox’s reputation is already on the line, the only worse choice would be Jerry Rivers.
The idea he is putting himself out there “6” different times says he’s desperate..yet again. He’s going to appeal to the same idiots who voted for him yet oppose the idea of going to war in Syria......unfortunately it doesn’t take much to sway them back to his court.
Yep. We have to keep up the pressure.
Six channels? The MSM ministry of untruth is going to be very busy!
Whatever they do, the lies will stick to 0 like shit sticks to a blanket.
Fox is moving left, and The Blaze will fill the void. The key is that The Blaze is not beholden to its sponsors. Beck learned an important lesson during his stint at Fox.
Came from more than Batchelor’s Show....it is out there that Obama has been distorting the intelligence to support his agenda for Syria......rather than let the intelligence speak for itself.
It's already been determined that the chemical “mixture” which was studied and tests from indicate it was a “dirty” mix...something Assad would not have to do...and that various ingredients were “old”....and Obama has this information.
Easy to assume this mixture came from the jihadists/rebels.
I’m impressed that he will take time away from playing golf.... < /sarc>
Word is that there aren't enough votes in the House, and in that case, Boehner won't hold a vote, in order to protect the president from embarassment.
Really.
BTTT! That’s Obummer:)
He has the worlds attention...and did at the G-20. He's basking in this Imo. Six TV interviews, he's counting on his “verbiage” to win the people over just as he used in his elections. He will be somewhat successful...the ones who voted for him will yield if they have been opposing the Syrian War.
Easy JUST tell everyone Assad made the Video that caused Benghazi,that will do it
Keep in mind that when Obama mentioned crossing the red line, that was last year. Now why did he bring that up? He didn’t have to bring that up. He could have waited to see if Assad ever used them and then say something. Notice how things seem to happen when there is something he wants? Obama sets it all up in a speech and by golly, it happens.
He wanted to grab guns and voila, we get all kinds of gun attacks by kooks.
IMO, this was planned before that speech when he mentioned the red line and what his response would be. I also think this was tied to Benghazi in some way.
I do need a root canal...I'll get it scheduled for Tuesday because I will be so knocked out from pain pills I'll sleep right through his speech.
Two birds; one stone.
-------------------------------------->
"...and I'll never have the recipe again. Oh, no." (think that's how it goes)*snicker*
Is his ego that is pulling the strings on Syria or Soros or "who"? Jarrett?
Saudi, Russia, Chinese?
Follow the money, I guess. Follow the natural resources. Follow the port cities and who might gain access to them for oil transport.
He's really pushing the "Get Assad Out" campaign.
It worked so well in Egypt, Libya./s
A Turkish fella' was the last appointment Steven's had before it hit the fan.
And, IIRC, it was only a short period of time between the Turk leaving and the attack on the consulate began.
And, 'let me make this clear'.
He is to address the nation Tuesday night. That would be 9/10. Why is he pressing so hard before 9/11?
I swear I expect to hear he launched an attack on 9/11. If he whores out the memory of all who lost their lives on 9/11, well, there are no words.
6. Channels
6. Interviews
6. Different messages
Sounds like the perfect number for 0-bama, the evil one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.