Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Something 'very fishy' about this Syria thing [Vanity]
September 03, 2013 | GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

Posted on 09/03/2013 11:45:11 AM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

I've got that same funny feeling about Obama's Syria threat that I've had during other events in recent months.

Right now we're seeing a highly visible 'public hearing' over the issue of Syria.. Why not another IRS scandal hearing, or Benghazi hearing or another hearing on the DOJ spying on Fox news? Obama and Congress seem to have whipped up a Syria hearing rather quickly, so what's the problem with doing so on these other issues? I smell a RAT!

Why does Obama want to start a war with Syria and possibly the entire region? What is the REAL reason for him doing this? I'm not sure, but I DO know that a military strike will bury just about every other news item for the next few weeks and I feel THAT is what this is all about.

In the next few weeks the Muslim Brotherhood will be on trial in Egypt. There's been talk that Obama is a Muslim Brotherhood MEMBER. Is THAT what Obama is trying to bury in the news? Or perhaps that Benghazi was a hostage-taking of Stevens planned by Hillary, so as to give Obama a reason to release the Blind Sheik to the MB? Why did McCain and Graham fly to Egypt to meet with the MB??? Was there a pay off made to keep them silent about Obama's involvement with them, or possibly his involvement in the 'hostage-taking gone bad' in Benghazi?

Something is very fishy about this Syria thing. Something's not right. Just as Obama called for Mubarak to step down for the MB to take his place, Obama is now asking Assad to step down for Al Qaeda to take his place?

We're looking at some serious 'wag the dog' here, folks. The GOP is on board with Obama although there is little to no evidence Assad is responsible for the chemical attack. We're being told there's no doubt chemical weapons were used, BUT THAT DOES NOT MEAN ASSAD IS THE ONE WHO DISPERSED THEM!!! It is entirely possible that those (Al Qaeda) who rip the hearts out of their enemy and EAT them would kill their own to get Obama to fight their war for them!!!

Obama supporting the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt is something NO CHRISTIAN PRESIDENT WOULD DO. The Muslim Brotherhood has torched numerous Coptic Christian churches to the ground and Obama has said NOTHING about this. The culprits are the ones he's funded and supported. Asking the man who has honored a peace treaty with Israel to STEP DOWN is something NO CHRISTIAN PRESIDENT WOULD DO.

Suddenly, we are expected to believe that Obama's motives are just for his desired action in Syria? Based on his FAILURES in Egypt, Libya and elsewhere.. Hell no, and HELL NO!!


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: media; obama; rebels; syria
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last
To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
Does anyone know the REAL reason for this Syria travesty?

Distraction from domestic/Benghazi scandals, while assisting the ME Caliphate?

21 posted on 09/03/2013 12:01:33 PM PDT by Jane Long (While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs stay silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Navy Patriot
Because it worked before, mass graves of Muslims in Serbia (that were empty), the Tonkin Gulf incident (that wasn't), the neutral passenger Lusitania (that was carrying munitions), it never ends.

Don't forget the Kuwaiti babies being thrown out of incubators (never happened)

22 posted on 09/03/2013 12:04:54 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (DC, it's Versailles on the Potomac but without the food and culture)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Sopater

All reasoning points to our government is lying to us....again. This dog is too big to ignore. May that tail brush aside the fog. This administration has lied to US so many times about so many things.


23 posted on 09/03/2013 12:05:25 PM PDT by V K Lee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
Wag the Dog
24 posted on 09/03/2013 12:05:37 PM PDT by hadaclueonce (dont worry about Mexico, put the fence around kalifornia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

The possibility of a war always grabs all the attention away from everything else. “Wag the Dog” is a very popular way for Presidents to pull cover.

“Why?” Your guess is as good as any. Seriously.


25 posted on 09/03/2013 12:06:09 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Uncle Miltie: Obama poisoned race relations for a generation. Everything is racial now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

Just remember that all of the “evidence” is being presented
by the same people who told us that Benghazi was caused by a video.


26 posted on 09/03/2013 12:06:32 PM PDT by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

Why? Are you kidding? If this country is at war, Obama wins on every issue without winning the mid-term election.

Let’s start with the debt limit. No debt limit because we are at war.

Obamacare defunding - might shut down the government, including the war effort.

Immigration- The president needs everyone’s support, now especially, and besides the immigrants would help fill the ranks of the military for a war weary country with gays serving openly.


27 posted on 09/03/2013 12:10:08 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

There are a number of reasons for those who want war. The importance of which, depends on who you are (O, Congress, Bankers, Mil/Ind Complex, Brotherhood, Iran, Israel, Saudis, Russia, China, and etc.).

The one you’ve mentioned (Wag the Dog), is certainly high on O’s list. For the Saudis and Israel, it’s Iran. For the Mil/Ind Complex, it’s more money. For the Banker’s is a distraction from their theft and failing fiat. For other countries, it’s control of the oil. Etc.

It’s not just one thing, or one group wanting war, and that’s why a grand war is very likely, IMO.


28 posted on 09/03/2013 12:10:35 PM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

Start a war, blow up the middle east,stop the flow of oil, start a bigger war, raise the price of oil for those that can get it and defeat those that can’t. Get debt forgiveness in exchange for oil, get new economy started etc...

This is what happens when you borrow more money than you could ever pay back, just start a war, defeat your debt holder and erase it.

Said a long time ago, the only way out of the financial mess we are in would be a global war, this may be the start of it.


29 posted on 09/03/2013 12:15:19 PM PDT by eastforker (Cruz for steam in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

But why is a Syrian dead baby worth more to 0bama than the numerous babies he’s killed with drones in Pakistan?


30 posted on 09/03/2013 12:20:40 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

Means something was going to come out that would reflect badly or be highly damaging to Zero.
So, deflect and redirect the outrage to something outrageous.


31 posted on 09/03/2013 12:25:34 PM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free..... Even robots will kill for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eastforker

A fraud takes over America . The goal is to destroy America by destroying Capitalism, the U.S. economy, creating the largest welfare state in history, destroy our borders, killing whites, destroying the military. And installing a communist regime. Misson Accomplished!


32 posted on 09/03/2013 12:25:36 PM PDT by Doc Savage ("I've shot people I like a lot more,...for a lot less!" Raylan Givins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

Free Trader Globalist Communists in both parties....there is no difference


33 posted on 09/03/2013 12:25:54 PM PDT by SeminoleCounty (You cannot be conservative while supporting the bankruptcy of your nation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doc Savage

Oh yeah I forgot. Be ready for some type of gas attack here in the USA sometime soon. If that won’t get the ball rollin, nothing will.


34 posted on 09/03/2013 12:29:17 PM PDT by eastforker (Cruz for steam in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: eastforker

Then again maybe I just watched to many episodes of 24!


35 posted on 09/03/2013 12:31:04 PM PDT by eastforker (Cruz for steam in 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Eva
Why? Are you kidding?

Well, no I wasn't kidding. You make my point very well though, and I appreciate it. Wag the Dog knocks everything else off the table, which would be a big "win" for the Big Ears.

36 posted on 09/03/2013 12:33:26 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Uncle Miltie: Obama poisoned race relations for a generation. Everything is racial now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

It sure has diverted attention from the “scandals”, and immigration “reform” will be passed with no media coverage.


37 posted on 09/03/2013 12:36:53 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

http://www.globalresearch.ca/did-the-white-house-help-plan-the-syrian-chemical-attack/5347542


38 posted on 09/03/2013 12:40:01 PM PDT by davisfh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Why wouldn’t they? There is so much collusion among the Western governments. I think all the intelligence services report what they are told to report.

It’s probably all about the natural gas pipeline and who controls it anyway.

We have no business going in there, no matter who did it. There is no national security interest. It is sad and horrible, whoever did it, but we cannot protect every citizen of the world from evil tyrants, that is not our job as a nation. We need to stop trying (or pretending that’s our mission).

At least Assad doesn’t persecute Christians.

And finally are we OUT OF OUR MINDS to be going in on the side of the MB and al Queda? It’s totally insane that 12 years after 9-11-2001 we are fighting alongside the terrorist group that killed 3000 Americans.

What a bunch of treasonous traitors we have running our country.


39 posted on 09/03/2013 12:43:26 PM PDT by boxlunch (II Chronicles 18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
If you want to know why, then start with why Obama, who was against using Cruise Missiles, shot 100 Cruise Missiles at Ghadaffi's convoys. Remember, Ghadaffi was our 'ally'.

Then, we shoved Ghadaffi out into the street unprotected, to be butt-raped and killed.

Then, we arrested his wife who was leaving the country with a large entourage (cargo planes).

Next up... all of a sudden Assad, who was our 'ally' is the target of more Cruise Missile Attacks.

Why?

Follow the money. Specifically, pure gold bars with no tungsten filling.

40 posted on 09/03/2013 12:57:48 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The monsters are due on Maple Street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson