Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Tax-cheat Charlie) Rangel: Bring back the draft before launching air strikes in Syria
The Hill ^ | 9/01/13 | Sheldon Alberts

Posted on 09/01/2013 5:49:47 PM PDT by Libloather

Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.) on Sunday renewed his call to reinstate the draft, arguing a vote should be held on mandatory military service before any decision is taken to launch strikes against Syria.

“I truly believe we should have a National Draft Act before the Congress acts,” Rangel told MSNBC.

Rangel, a decorated veteran of the Korean War, has for several years introduced legislation to bring back the draft and earlier this, for the first time, advocated that women should be included.

The New York lawmaker said the burden of war unfairly falls on lower-income Americans.

“They are not in the Hamptons. They are not in the wealthy neighborhoods,” he said.

Rangel, a former chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee and the third-longest-serving member of Congress, has made it clear he will vote “no” on a forthcoming resolution seeking congressional approval for limited strikes on Syria.

Although Rangel said he is satisfied that Syrian President Bashar Assad is responsible for poison gas attacks on his own people last month, he argued it is not the U.S.’s responsibility to respond on behalf of the world.

“There is no mandate that the United States of America has to get rid of every evil person,” Rangel said.

“If it’s an international problem it should be an international solution.”

Rangel said he would not attend a Sunday afternoon “members-only” briefing for lawmakers on Capitol Hill about the proposed Syrian military strike because he could not justify the use of force to his constituents.

“If I have the slightest idea how this gross violation of international law affects citizens of the United States of America, my ears are open to see the connection,” he said.

President Obama surprised many in Congress on Saturday by announcing he would seek congressional approval before launching military strikes he argues are necessary to hold Assad accountable for the use of chemical weapons.

In a letter to Obama last week, 53 liberal Democrats — including many members of the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) argued that Assad’s actions "should not draw us into an unwise war” without first having Congress authorize the action.

On Sunday, liberal Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Fla.) argued there is no justification for U.S. involvement — especially since the country lacks allies for its proposed strikes.

“How is it that this is always our responsibility?” Grayson said on MSNBC.

The proper course of action is not to bomb Syria, but to take Assad to the international war crimes court in The Hague.

“What would change my mind is someone explaining to me what the heck this has to do with us,” he said.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; Israel; News/Current Events; Russia; Syria; US: Florida; US: New York; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: alangrayson; blackkk; charlierangel; cheat; draft; florida; iran; israel; koreanwar; lebanon; maheralassad; msnbc; nationaldraftact; newyork; rangel; russia; syria; thebrotherdidit; unitedkingdom; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last
Just how big will these air strikes be? Did the tax-cheat just escalate the situation?
1 posted on 09/01/2013 5:49:47 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Didn’t take long for the DemocRATs to scream for the Draft. They’re itching for it.


2 posted on 09/01/2013 5:50:36 PM PDT by Nachum (I am Breitbartacus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Somebody tell Charlie he doesn’t need to do this again.


3 posted on 09/01/2013 5:51:47 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

So why does Rangel want to reinstate the draft?


4 posted on 09/01/2013 5:54:35 PM PDT by LucianOfSamasota (Tanstaafl - its not just for breakfast anymore...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
Yeah ... what IS it with this guy and the draft?

Maybe wrinkle was drafted and he's still pissed off about it.

5 posted on 09/01/2013 5:54:35 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Rangel is full of crap....

http://usmilitary.about.com/od/joiningthemilitary/a/demographics.htm


6 posted on 09/01/2013 5:55:36 PM PDT by freebilly (Creepy and the Ass Crackers....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Dem democrats loooooooveses de draft.


7 posted on 09/01/2013 5:56:31 PM PDT by null and void (I'm betting on an Obama Trifecta: A Nobel Peace Prize, an Impeachment, AND a War Crimes Trial...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Oh my.... am I actually agreeing with Alan Grayson?
8 posted on 09/01/2013 5:56:59 PM PDT by workerbee (The President of the United States is DOMESTIC ENEMY #1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucianOfSamasota
So why does Rangel want to reinstate the draft?

He knows that there is no political tide in favor of it so by linking Syria to the draft---no action in Syria.

9 posted on 09/01/2013 5:57:15 PM PDT by lightman (Prosecute the heresies; pity the heretics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: knarf

He does it to stir anti war sentiment.

Kind of interesting that he’s doing it now. Kind of a shot across the bow of the scow of Obama.


10 posted on 09/01/2013 5:57:42 PM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LucianOfSamasota

It’s the only way his bro’s are gonna get a job!


11 posted on 09/01/2013 5:58:42 PM PDT by Twotone (Marte Et Clypeo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Oh God, shut up, Rangel. Just shut up. You’re just grandstanding, everyone knows it. We know it, your “friends,” everyone. Shut up.


12 posted on 09/01/2013 5:58:46 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucianOfSamasota
So why does Rangel want to reinstate the draft?

A country that can't raise enough volunteers to defend itself isn't worth defending.

Democrats want a country that needs a draft.

13 posted on 09/01/2013 5:58:59 PM PDT by null and void (I'm betting on an Obama Trifecta: A Nobel Peace Prize, an Impeachment, AND a War Crimes Trial...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LucianOfSamasota
So why does Rangel want to reinstate the draft?

Him? The logic is sound on his part. Libs are usually cowards and the good Congressman Rangel actually served and went to Korea.

He obviously thinks that if liberal politicians actually have to go and tell their constituents that average Americans are going to have fight and die, they will BACK OFF -like the cowards they are.

Some shmucks like Rahm Emaneul actually like the idea. They want every American to serve for two years, like in Israel. Americans have gotten quite used to the idea that their kids don't have to serve in the military.

14 posted on 09/01/2013 6:00:49 PM PDT by Nachum (I am Breitbartacus!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Something about - ‘only the lower class’ fight the wars?

I think they just hate liberty that much - any chance to FORCE a citizen to do something is rewarding to them.


15 posted on 09/01/2013 6:01:18 PM PDT by LucianOfSamasota (Tanstaafl - its not just for breakfast anymore...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Rangel really is a one trick pony.


16 posted on 09/01/2013 6:04:19 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the people. T Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LucianOfSamasota

So why does Rangel want to reinstate the draft?
__________________________________________________

He doesn’t . He would vote nay.


17 posted on 09/01/2013 6:05:40 PM PDT by o-n-money
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: null and void
A country that can't raise enough volunteers to defend itself isn't worth defending.

Ain't that the frickin' truth!
18 posted on 09/01/2013 6:05:45 PM PDT by arderkrag (An Unreconstructed Georgian, STANDING WITH RAND.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Include women and gays and watch the dems squeal...


19 posted on 09/01/2013 6:08:36 PM PDT by neodad (USS Vincennes (CG-49) Freedom's Fortress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
He did this seven years ago but for a different stated reason.
20 posted on 09/01/2013 6:09:11 PM PDT by Olog-hai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson