U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg to preside over gay wedding

Reuters ^ | August 30, 2013 | By Lawrence Hurley

[Oldeconomybuyer]

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is to officiate at a wedding ceremony between two men this weekend, just two months after the court issued high-profile rulings on the highly divisive issue.

As reported by the Washington Post, Ginsburg will preside over the wedding of Michael Kaiser, the president of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington, and John Roberts, an economist.

[Gay State Conservative]

A Marxist punk in black robes.

[MeganC]

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is to officiate at a wedding ceremony between two men this weekend

Okay, so Ginsburg will be there. But who's the other guy?

[Extremely Extreme Extremist]

Sick, sick, sick.

[LibLieSlayer]

What can I say? I cannot say what I feel.

[immadashell]

ROTFLMAO

[BillyBoy]

>> As reported by the Washington Post, Ginsburg will preside over the wedding of Michael Kaiser, the president of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts in Washington, and John Roberts <<

Yikes. No wonder he went to the dark side on Obamacare. ;-)

[IronJack]

Might be a silly question but under what authority can Ginsburg unite ANYBODY in wedlock? She’s a Supreme Court justice, not a justice of the peace or an ordained minister. As far as I know, the right to perform a wedding is granted by states. What state has empowered her?

[UCANSEE2]

It’s the new way. Set a precedent, regardless to the fact that it’s unconstitutional or illegal. Then ram it up everyone’s arse.

[musicman]

Help FR Continue the Conservative Fight!
Your Monthly and Quarterly Donations
Help Keep FR In the Battle!

Sponsoring FReepers are contributing
$10 Each time a New Monthly Donor signs up!
Get more bang for your FR buck!
Click Here To Sign Up Now!

[RIghtwardHo]

Any Judge, State or Federal, has that authority.

[olezip]

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is to officiate at a wedding ceremony between two men this weekend, just two months after the court issued high-profile rulings on the highly divisive issue.

How appropriate (and vile) that U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg is to officiate at a wedding ceremony between two men this weekend.

[SoFloFreeper]

I’m more convinced each day we are living in the growing shadow of Divine Judgement. Jerusalem 586 BC, Rome 476 AD, Constantinople 1453, Paris 1814, Moscow 1917, Berlin 1945, and now Washington...2014?

IIRC, all of these cities, empires, reichs or nations became decadent and loathsome....some more than others, of course....but the morality degenerated rapidly and so did the economies and defense.

Which is what is happening now.

Never been someone who believed in God? Start.

[Viennacon]

What a vile, twisted hag.

[onyx]

What can I say? I cannot say what I feel.

Ditto!

[jy8z]

Stick a fork in US...we’re done.

[onyx]

God bless Texas.
Stay put!

[IronJack]

Any Judge, State or Federal, has that authority.

Not to quibble, but technically the Supreme Court justices are just that: justices. They are not judges. They do not even have to be certified before the Bar.

Not that I suppose such a fine legal distinction would concern a Lefty anyway ...