Verify chemical weapons use before unleashing the dogs of war

Daily Caller ^ | 08/29/2013 | Kenneth Timmerman

[tennmountainman]

I have to say the Brits took this intervention seriously enough to vote.
Where is Waldo Boehner? Where is Congress?

[familyop]

Next year, government-linked businesses and government employees unions, with funding for their various constituent groups taking first priority, will demand that civil court cases decide for or against military actions. That will work well, when Iran launches nukes at us.

[penelopesire]

I would say pretty good. He has a long track record of being reliable IMHO.

[lafarge]

Sanity. World right side up.

[pepsionice]

I think if Reagan were around today....around six months ago....quietly and not saying anything to anyone in advance....he would have fired off a dozen cruise missiles on Syria. The warning would be that you need to do a regime change or something, but he’d make sure that warning avoided taking massive steps later.

[MacNaughton]

Counting noses ...

FOR = BHO, John McCain, BO'Re

AGAINST = Donald Rumsfeld, John Bolton, Col. David Hunt, the Lt. Col. on FNC

[MacNaughton]

forgot 1 ...

AGAINST = ... and the British Parliament

[Ann Archy]

GREAT point!!! I didn't know it was in Damascus!!!

IF there was a chemical attack....BIG IF, I do NOT believe that it was Assad doing it.

[af_vet_rr]

It’s been obvious from day one this was a rebel attack. They have no regard for human life. It’s they, and they alone that benefit from this scenario...

Doesn't matter. Just because Dear Leader likes to draw imaginary lines in the sand does not mean we go to war with another country.

[Girlene]

Thanks.