Posted on 08/26/2013 6:31:28 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o
.
During the same month that U. S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy was issuing his opinion that the Defense of Marriage Act humiliated tens of thousands of children now being raised by same-sex couples, Russias House of Parliament voted unanimously to ban the adoption of Russian children by same-sex couples from abroad. The House also voted to forbid single people who are citizens or permanent residents of countries that allow same sex marriage to become adoptive parents or legal guardians of Russian children.
Childrens rights ombudsman Pavel Astakhov vowed to do everything possible to ensure that Russian orphans are only adopted by traditional, heterosexual families.
Russias President Vladimir Putin, who has already expressed support for the adoption ban, has promised to sign the bill once it is submitted for its final reading during the Russian parliaments autumn session. Putin has strong support from the Head of the Russian Orthodox Church, Patriarch Kirill, who sees the recognition of same sex unions as a portent of doom and has called upon Russians to ensure that sin is never formalized by the rule of law. In a Sunday service in Red Squares Kazan Cathedral on July 20th, the Patriarch said we face enormous temptations when countries start approving sin and codifying it into law in order to justify it.
Russias Patriarch echoes the sentiments of Pope Francis who has described same sex marriage as a destructive attack on Gods plan. He has also said that gay adoption is a form of discrimination against children. In 2010, as Argentinas Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio, he protested a bill to allow same sex marriage and gay adoption in Argentina. Writing that the Argentine people will face a situation whose outcome can seriously harm the family at stake is the identity and survival of the family at stake is the total rejection of Gods law engraved on our hearts. Despite the Cardinals protests, Argentina approved same sex marriage in 2010 making it the first Latin American country to legalize the unions.
Unlike Argentina, there remains strong public support for the same sex adoption ban in Russia. While homosexual behavior was decriminalized in Russia in 1993, a poll by the Levada Center, an independent research center, revealed that 38 percent of Russians believe that homosexuality is a disorder, and that homosexuals need medical treatment. Another 13 percent believe that homosexuals should be prosecuted.
It is likely that the Russian people are responding to some recent high-profile cases in which Russian children were adopted and later, sexually abused by same sex couples. In fact, during the same week that Justice Kennedy was issuing his ruling on same sex marriage, a district court in Indiana was hearing arguments against a gay couple who purchased a child from a Russian surrogate and sexually abused that child for the first six years of his life.
According to international media reports, including Pravda and Australias Sydney-Herald, Mark Newton, 42, an American, and his Australian spouse, Peter Truong, 26, traveled to Russia in 2005, and paid a surrogate $8,000 to carry their child. Shortly after they returned home to the United States with the newborn, they began a six year siege of sexual abuse which included shopping the child throughout the world to be abusedand videotapedby at least eight men in the United States, Germany, Australia, and France. Creating a lucrative business for the parents of the child through the selling of pornographic photographs and videos on pedophile sites, including the Boy Lovers Network, the district court concluded that the same-sex couple created this child solely for the purpose of sexual exploitation, and sentenced Mr. Newton to 40 years in prison. Truong awaits sentencing.
Once described as a model family in an ABC Far North Queensland, Australia television documentary titled, Two Dads are Better Than One which aired on July 14, 2010, the gay couple told the interviewer that becoming parents was hard work but theyd do it all over again if they had to. This is exactly the kind of love story that seems to have motivated Justice Kennedy to write that same sex families deserve the integrity and closeness that his ruling would provide.
Justice Kennedy often refers to his own idyllic childhood during the post-war boom in the Golden State of California. In a speech he once gave, Justice Kennedy said that growing up in California for him was like the movie, Its a Wonderful Life. He seems to believe he can bring a similarly wonderful life to others if he only rules the right way. In fact, in an article entitled Supreme Leader: The Arrogance of Anthony Kennedy, Jeffrey Rosen of The New Republic wrote that Anthony Kennedy doesnt much care whether his abstractions are true; the important thing for him is that he wants them to be true.
On June 30th, Russian President Putin signed a controversial law strengthening the penalties for propagating homosexuality among minors. This bill introduces fines for propaganda of non-traditional sexual relationships to minorsincluding in the media, and on the internet. The bill also prohibits the obtrusive spreading of information about non-traditional sexual relationships that may arouse interest in such relationships.
Justice Kennedy wants to believe that all love stories have happy endingshe seems to believe that we are all a Supreme Court decision away from a perfect life. But, the Russian people, as well as their Patriarch and President know that there are some stories that may not end happily.
Some say we should give up because we have "already lost" the game-sex marriage fight. No. This must be stopped this year or next year, 2 years or five years from now. We should fight until hell freezes over and then write on the ice: we're still fighting.
This perversion is soul-killing and civilization-killing. I think it must be stopped.
Un-freaking-believable.
http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/06/30/duke.molestation.internet/
http://maggiesnotebook.blogspot.com/2010/03/frank-m-lombard-sentenced-duke-child.html
Didn’t get a lot of coverage in the MSM.
Agree 100% - worst of all, it is just not fair or good for the child.
Robert Lopez was raised by his lesbian mother and speaks quite pointedly about what it did to his life - here is his latest contribution.
Agree totally.
Russia is standing up for morality and common-sense, while America continues to culturally rot and decay, siding with sheer evil. It’s really mind-blowing, seeing what has become of our country, and how it’s fallen.
The happy “family” was the subject of a newsmagazine touting how gay families are just like other families. The newsmagazine episode has been scrubbed from the internet. These men adopted this baby for the express purpose of raising him to be a live sex toy for them and their homosexual pedophile ring. Home videos show the toddler performing sex acts is a very experienced manner. One of the “dads” is claiming he should get a light sentence because he, too, was homosexually abused by a sex ring when he was a child. The saddest part is that the little boy is now in foster care in California, a state in which he cannot receive counseling for unwanted same sex attraction. See how that works?
Thanks, Lopez’ article is fantastic.
Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:
Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.
Lopez is fantastic - here is a link to his archives on American Thinker. A treasure trove of ammo on this issue.
http://www.americanthinker.com/robert_oscar_lopez/
If I understand the law correctly, he could again be placed in such a household, with same sex foster parents.
China has had these same no-gay policies forever and it rarely makes news, they are very socially conservative and always have been.
They don’t let Hollywood and MTV raise their kids for them. Mom and Dad’s do that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.