Ted Cruz Ping!
/johnny
Where does Cruz stand on intervention in Syria?
The question as to where Obama was born is not the only concern about Obama's citizenship qualification to be president. The concern about where Obama was born is a decoy from the corrupt media imo, including Obama guard dog Fx News, to keep citizens from wising up about major constitutional concerns with Obama's citizenship qualifications to be president.
More specifically, John Bingham, the main author of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment which addresses citizenship, had officially clarified the following about requirements to be a natural born citizen. Bingham had noted in the congressional record that one criterion for somebody to be a natural born citizen is that both parents must be full citizens when that person is born.
“All from other lands, who by the terms of [congressional] laws and a compliance with their provisions become naturalized, are adopted citizens of the United States; all other persons born within the Republic, of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty, are natural born citizens. (emphasis added) Gentleman can find no exception to this statement touching natural-born citizens except what is said in the Constitution relating to Indians.” (Cong. Globe, 37th, 2nd Sess., 1639 (1862)) (See bottom half of 1st column.)“I find no fault with the introductory clause, which is simply declaratory of what is written in the Constitution, that every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen; (emphasis added) but, sir, I may be allowed to say further, that I deny that the Congress of the United States ever had the power or color of power to say that any man born within the jurisdiction of the United States, and not owing a foreign allegiance, is not and shall not be a citizen of the United States.” John A. Bingham, (R-Ohio) US Congressman, Architect of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment, March 9, 1866. Cong. Globe, 39th, 1st Sess., 1291 (1866), Sec. 1992 of U.S. Revised Statutes (1866), Cf. U.S. Const. XIVth Amend. (See top half of 2nd column)
And since Obama's official birth certificate indicated that Obama Sr., a man possibly not Obama's biological father, was likely not a US citizen, then Obama is not constitutionally qualified to be president if such is the case. But also note that Cruz may have similar citizenship problems.
“I don’t really like jumping on bandwagons too quickly, Rubio, Ryan, sometimes they abandon Conservatives on big issues. That being said I like Ted Cruz and at this time find no one better. I too am disturbed about citizenship but it’s not my job or within my power to declare him elgible or inelgible and if the powers that be declare him elgible and he’s on the ballot I’ll support and vote for him. Again we can thank democrats for elgibility standards being clouded.”
I previously posted this comment and I see nothing here to change my opinion.
Ted Cruz is the real deal. He’s transcendent, unlike Obama, who’s a man of the times for the times. Cruz is the true antidote; an antitoxin for a body politic that’s really sick. Enough of Obama and his leeches.
If Cruz runs, I’ll vote for him so fast I’ll fall over my own feet trying to get there.
Can you add me to the Cruz ping list, please?
There you go... Cruz is my favorite for 2016 at this point. I hope the folks pushing the foreign nonsense shut the F U.