Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Elizabeth Coast to Serve Two Months for Committing Perjury (Man Served 4 Years for Rape)
WTKR ^ | Holly Henry and Reed Andrews | August 19, 2013

Posted on 08/24/2013 2:52:04 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Elizabeth Coast will serve two months in jail for committing perjury after lying about a sexual assault from Jonathan Montgomery.

The Commonwealth Attorney wanted Coast to serve four years, the same amount of time Montgomery had served.

Coast cried repeatedly during her sentencing hearing and her lawyer tried to portray her as a naive, then 17-year-old who feared her parents.

Coast says she never thought the lie would hurt Montgomery, and only said it was him because he had moved out of the area.

Coast has to pay $90,000 in restitution to Montgomery. The now 23-year-old will be locked up every weekend for the next seven months. Coast says, “I never forgot, I never forgot about Jonathan. It wrecked my life.”


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: rawhide

21 posted on 08/24/2013 3:21:35 PM PDT by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Locked up every weekend for 7 months ???

What about the guy who [as a convicted teen rapist] was prolly forced to drop trou every day [twice on Sundays] for four years?

She shoulda gotten 4 years and forced to serve it in the men’s prison - get the same sumthin’ sumthin’ that he got ...


22 posted on 08/24/2013 3:22:44 PM PDT by Lmo56 (If ya wanna run with the big dawgs - ya gotta learn to piss in the tall grass ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seacapn

“I don’t understand how the judge was able to find the defendant guilty using the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard. The evidence was simply not there.

It leads me to believe the judge is either corrupt or outright incompetent.”

She plead guilty. Case closed.


23 posted on 08/24/2013 3:23:42 PM PDT by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator
She plead guilty. Case closed.

No, dude; the other case.

24 posted on 08/24/2013 3:26:10 PM PDT by stormhill (Guns Save Lives!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

Yes, she is very clearly guilty. I meant her victim, the teen she sent to prison on a false child molestation conviction. The only evidence against him was her testimony that he had molested her several years ago. That was it. There was no other evidence offered beyond that.

That fails the “beyond a reasonable doubt” standard, but the judge convicted the young man regardless, which is not how “the system” is supposed to work.


25 posted on 08/24/2013 3:26:29 PM PDT by seacapn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I gues it wasn’t Rape rape.


26 posted on 08/24/2013 3:27:37 PM PDT by Cowboy Bob (Democrats: Robbing Peter to buy Paul's vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56

Innocent. 4 years of his life LOST.

27 posted on 08/24/2013 3:28:04 PM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TexasGator

They’re talking about the guy convicted of “rape” when there was no evidence...they are not talking about the girl being convicted for pleading guilty.


28 posted on 08/24/2013 3:28:50 PM PDT by Southack (Media Bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

Guilty !


29 posted on 08/24/2013 3:32:56 PM PDT by Menehune56 ("Let them hate so long as they fear" (Oderint Dum Metuant), Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

You beat me to it!


30 posted on 08/24/2013 3:34:31 PM PDT by quilterdebbie (We will endeavor to persevere!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rawhide

Maybe her name should be Elizabeth Coast-to-Coast.


31 posted on 08/24/2013 4:03:18 PM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
This is the practical reason why (along with the moral one of protecting life) there can never be an rape exemption if abortion were once again outlawed.

If abortion were outlawed with a rape exemption the number of false rape allegations would skyrocket and countless innocent men would face prison so that selfish women could get out of having a child.

32 posted on 08/24/2013 4:03:49 PM PDT by ClaytonP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seacapn

The perjury of false accusation is the very worst. Hillary and Obama should both be imprisoned for blaming the Benghazi attacks on Nakoula Basseley Nakoula.


33 posted on 08/24/2013 4:27:44 PM PDT by jimfree (In November 2016 my 13 y/o granddaughter will have more quality exec experience than Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: seacapn

Did he have to agree to a judge trial with no jury.


34 posted on 08/24/2013 4:37:19 PM PDT by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

she should have to serve his full sentence.


35 posted on 08/24/2013 5:07:53 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beelzepug

you didn’t get the /sarc here, did ya...


36 posted on 08/24/2013 5:09:16 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I know people are upset because she is only serving 2 months versus the 4 years he served due to her perjury, but how willing would people be to recant their testimony and get innocent people out of prison if the punishment for doing so was severe? I know, it’s not “fair”.


37 posted on 08/24/2013 5:13:23 PM PDT by KrisKrinkle (Blessed be those who know the depth and breadth of their ignorance. Cursed be those who don't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

The evidence they had that he did is what [should have] mattered...


38 posted on 08/24/2013 5:22:44 PM PDT by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Axenolith

And that was apparently thin as celophane...


39 posted on 08/24/2013 5:26:06 PM PDT by Axenolith (Government blows, and that which governs least, blows least...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I believe so. That is often done because jurors tend to be over-emotional and will often render “guilty” verdicts in the absence of actual evidence. By going before a judge, that problem is supposed to be diminished. Looks like the judge was every bit as faulty as a jury probably would have been.


40 posted on 08/24/2013 5:27:25 PM PDT by seacapn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson