Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UPS to drop 15,000 spouses from insurance, cites Obamacare
Atlanta Business Chronicle ^ | Aug 21, 2013, 5:13am EDT Updated: Aug 21, 2013, 7:13am EDT

Posted on 08/21/2013 5:22:33 AM PDT by Perdogg

United Parcel Service Inc. plans to remove thousands of spouses from its medical plan because they are eligible for coverage elsewhere. The Atlanta-based logistics company points to the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, as a big reason for the decision, reports Kaiser Health News.

(Excerpt) Read more at bizjournals.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 0carenightmare; aca; democrats; economy; epicfail; insurancedropped; jobs; obama; obamacare; pelosi; spouses; ups
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

1 posted on 08/21/2013 5:22:33 AM PDT by Perdogg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Ha All Obot voters I'm sure.
2 posted on 08/21/2013 5:23:55 AM PDT by angcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Like the other stories, this will be revised and quashed by dinner time..


3 posted on 08/21/2013 5:24:22 AM PDT by newnhdad (Our new motto: USA, it was fun while it lasted.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

and it just keeps getting better and better


4 posted on 08/21/2013 5:24:23 AM PDT by Mr. K (Lies, Damned Lies, Statistics, and then Democrat Talking Points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: angcat

Unlikely. UPS is a very conservative company as are a large majority of the employees. Plus this only applies to “management” not the union employees:

“According to Kaiser, UPS told white-collar workers two months ago that 15,000 working spouses eligible for coverage by their own employers would be excluded from the UPS plan in 2014.

UPS expects the move, which applies to non-union U.S. workers only,”


5 posted on 08/21/2013 5:27:44 AM PDT by Wyatt's Torch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: angcat
Prolly working spouses that get a better deal with hubby's insurance than the crap from Dewy, Cheatem and Howe where THEY work.

If so ... mixed feelings

(except of course ozero is the cause of all that's happening bad in America ... now.)

6 posted on 08/21/2013 5:28:03 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: knarf
Prolly working spouses that get a better deal with hubby's insurance than the crap from Dewy, Cheatem and Howe where THEY work.

That shouldn't matter. An employer should have no obligation to pay compensation to people who aren't employees and do not contribute in any way to the employer's business activities. When an employer covers a spouse and other family members under its insurance plan, that's effectively what it is doing.

7 posted on 08/21/2013 5:37:52 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I've never seen such a conclave of minstrels in my life.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Obamacare and gay marriage.

And companies refuse to hire or massively cut back.

The unintended consequences of a “progressive” government.

And they will never blame themselves why their economies don’t work. They will just blame evil corporations.


8 posted on 08/21/2013 5:42:14 AM PDT by 2banana (My common ground with terrorists - they want to die for islam and we want to kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
An employer should have no obligation to pay compensation to people who aren't employees and do not contribute in any way to the employer's business activities.

Granted. BUT, it has been a benefit and part of the employee's overall compensation. The company gains by attracting employees who value that. At one time, it was economically feasible to make that decision. Now, not so much.

9 posted on 08/21/2013 5:44:25 AM PDT by don-o (He will not share His glory, and He will not be mocked! Blessed be the Name of the Lord forever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Teamsters: “Wait! What?”


10 posted on 08/21/2013 5:45:08 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Is John's moustache long enough YET?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paine in the Neck

Oh, unions exempt - for now.


11 posted on 08/21/2013 5:46:14 AM PDT by Paine in the Neck (Is John's moustache long enough YET?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
An employer should have no obligation to pay compensation to people who aren't employees and do not contribute in any way to the employer's business activities.

This has always been a way for UPS to attract better workers while keeping pay rates low. It is in effect, a pay cut for those employees who make use of this freely negotiated benefit.
12 posted on 08/21/2013 5:48:50 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There's no salvation in politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Wyatt's Torch

The union employees have a contract which will be renegotiated at some point, and I expect health insurance will be a big part of the negotiations.

Expect to see more of this as companies of all stripes look at the numbers. It will just make economic sense. Employers who have benefited from employees married to spouses working at Cadillac coverage companies will start to shift their plans as well. In the end the path leads to obamacare.


13 posted on 08/21/2013 5:51:52 AM PDT by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Technically, an employer has no OBLIGATION to provide ANY benefits whatsoever. However, to retain employees and attract new employees, employers often DO offer benefits. . . . Assuming that since it is not compulsory, then it is forbidden is a Lefty thought-process, friend. . .


14 posted on 08/21/2013 5:53:40 AM PDT by Salgak (http://catalogoftehburningstoopid.blogspot.com 100% all-natural snark !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Yet their direct competitor, FedEx, has not found it necessary to invoke such “austerity measures” for its management.

The difference? UPS is a union shop.


15 posted on 08/21/2013 5:54:53 AM PDT by Cletus.D.Yokel (Catastrophic Anthropogenic Climate Alterations - The acronym explains the science.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
Obamacare and gay marriage.

And companies refuse to hire or massively cut back.

The unintended consequences of a “progressive” government.

I disagree, those consequences are entirely intended. Just oiling the slippery slope.

16 posted on 08/21/2013 5:56:28 AM PDT by Second Amendment First
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
The health law requires large employers to cover employees and dependent children, but not spouses or domestic partners, Kaiser adds.

Wow, a bit of an oversight, no?

17 posted on 08/21/2013 6:02:07 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (Kill Obamacare not wound it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Have you thought,"Why would the ones who espoused obamacare as the best thing since sliced bread, are the ones that are now saying how bad it will be?" That they did not realize how bad it was? Not the answer. They were informed over and over again by not just one but many of what it would lead to, do, and its long term effects. Those who tried to warn were ridiculed and ignored.

The answer is Obamacare was designed to do three things: Bankrupt private insurance companies and the medical profession. 2. Fail. 3. Pave the way for a single payer system, a/k/a socialized medicine.

Now that the Supreme Court has declared it Constitutional it will accomplish goal one and in accomplishing goal one fail, thus accomplishing goal two.

What is happening now is laying the groundwork for goal three; the design and implementation of a single payer system. Bullshit, you say, it is preposterous to consider obamacare a failure and it is too early to even think of a single payer system. Recall how many years it took the Democrats to get obamacare passed? The Democrats heed the lessons learned from their mistakes. The Republicans don't.

18 posted on 08/21/2013 6:03:17 AM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wyatt's Torch

“this only applies to “management” not the union employees”

Come the next contract, it could get interesting.


19 posted on 08/21/2013 6:05:58 AM PDT by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mike Darancette

The health law requires large employers to cover employees and dependent children, but not spouses or domestic partners, Kaiser adds.

“Wow, a bit of an oversight, no? “

The DemonRats war on Women and Gays, news at 5:00, or not.


20 posted on 08/21/2013 6:09:52 AM PDT by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson