Posted on 08/16/2013 9:29:50 AM PDT by marktwain
There are obviously verifiable vote fraud problems in North Carolina.
In 2010 those problems surfaced meaningfully as indicated in the below voter fraud post from an earlier Charlotte Conservative Examiner article:
Perhaps in an effort to promote North Carolina as one of the healthiest States in the Nation, this latest voter twist comes to us from Susan Myrick of the Civitas Institute in North Carolina--not to be confused with Rep. Sue Myrick of NC who is unrelated. In a radio interview with local WBT Anchor Tara Servatious, Susan reports that she has been keeping track of the number of votes in North Carolina of individuals over the age of 110 years and apparently we have quite a few, over 410 of the 110 year olds--to be exact-- actually voted via absentee ballot on October the 28th. Yes indeed, now it would appear that good ole NC has the market cornered on the Centenarian vote.
At latest count, Susan has garnered a total Absentee Ballot vote of over 2,660 people over the age of 110. Someone contact the Guiness Book and warm up the Ford, the Fountain of Youth exists and its right here in lovely NC. It's no wonder people are moving here in droves--maybe the use of tobacco isn't such a bad thing after all? But, on a more serious note, with all of the irregularities going on all over the place, we can now begin to wonder about a few things.
Apparently those ultra-healthy seniors over 110 have aged and are now astoundingly over 112 years old, and are still able to make it to the polls ahead of time.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
OK, that would translate out to a minimum of 21yo as of 12/31/1959 and assuming all of these 583 Democrats were just exactly 21 on that date, we would be looking at 21+53 or minimum ages for these undocumented voters of 74, not an unusual age in today's USofA. I'd love to ask any of these people as they came up to vote, how old they really were just to see if this was a proxy vote, but of course since Democrats never cheat, what would be the point?
On the other hand, are there any Republicans that fall into this undocumented category? If I recall correctly, unlike many other parts of the "yellow dog" South, Republicans could register relatively normally in many places in NC during those years. So are there any Republican 110-112 year olds?
But but but Hillary JUST told us voter fraud charges are baseless. Now HOW can this be? She won’t lie, right Uncle Democrat?
New Jersey, 1981?
I am sure I have lots of company in total ignorance about this suit, and its yearly "renewal."
Several observations. First of all it's obscure and unknown; that is no longer true.
Number 2 -- it prevents the GOP from challenging FRAUDULENT VOTING, BUT NO OTHER PARTY OR GROUP WITH STANDING.
That can be fixed.
Finally, it is a curiosity that "stings" are legal to identify and catch prostitutes, drug dealers, car thieves and sundry other groups of criminals, but not fraudulent voters!
What's up with that?
Unfortunately no “Other Party Or Group” has the resources or standing to investigate vote fraud.
For instance most judges would toss out a Libertarian investigation into vote fraud because they have no standing - they weren’t going to win anyway so they weren’t harmed.
This is assuming, of course, the Libertarians had the resources for such an investigation in the first place.
I find that hard to believe. Only "official" parties have standing?
That certainly suggests several avenues of attack. As a group, honest legal voters far outnumber all other groups combined!
And they are certainly the most clearly injured.
The “justice” system is so corrupt that I doubt it would agree that voters have standing to sue over vote fraud.
Most likely, the courts would hold that only candidates with “real” chance of winning have standing, i.e. Democrats and ‘Pubbies, have standing. The candidate would have to show that vote fraud caused him to lose the election. I think it is really that bad now.
And ‘Pubbies can’t sue or investigate vote fraud, while Democrats encourage it.
Meanwhile a couple days ago Juan Williams on Special Report said there is absolutely no proof of Democrat fraud...
No kidding.
Thank you for the clarification.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.