5.56mm
If it comes down to subpoenas, they will throw Jarrett under the bus. The question is whether or not Obama will pardon her after she’s convicted or if she’ll squeal on the regime in exchange for immunity.
Should be interesting.
Sorry. There’s a reason “treason” is defined in the Constitution.
Do you know what the reason is?
” Obama refused to help Americans under attack. Barack Obama created a fantasy of a mob turned violent over an anti-Muslim YouTube video. And now Barack Hussein Obama is keeping the CIA agents that were stationed at the CIA Annex under lock and key”
All of those things are unquestionable prerogatives of the office that “Obama”, or whatever his real name is, was unfortunately elected to - twice.
You know, we have orgs. like Oath Keepers, retired CIA operatives, retired military, etc...etc...
None of them have seen fit to DO anything. None of these “muzzled” patriots have seen fit to whistel blow dispite what is being done to them.
Either there is a “bigger picture” of which they are aware and we are not, or they are keeping shut to protect their jobs. Something just doesn’t make sense.
Panetta taking orders from Jarett. Petraeus keeping quiet. We are supposed to believe everyone in this administration is either evil or gutless.....
......NEVERMIND.....
The media is complicit. If this were under a Republican president, the media would be obsessing 24/7 and the headlines in newspapers would blast the evil fascist.
But the president is an America-hating marxist, and the media approve of his actions.
Madame Benghazi, otherwise known as Herself, the Cold and Joyless, had no small part to play in the whole spin factory that was involved in the run-up and execution of the gun-running operation to the Syrian rebels.
There was no rational excuse for the series of wrong moves and illogical responses in the whole episode, and like the much lesser circumstances that surrounded the Watergate break-in of 1972, the cover-up and the lies were much worse than the original infraction involved.
Valerie Jarrett is more or less in the same position that Alexander Haig found himself in as the inner circle in the Oval Office began to collapse around Nixon - the “person in charge” when the titular chief could not or would not act decisively.
On so many levels, the Current Occupant of the White Hut is morphing into Richard Nixon of 1973 and 1974.
And NOBODY loved Nixon when the whole façade came crashing down.
“Jarrett will be thrown under the bus” —that is a totally ridiculous statement. There are appearances that have 2b attended to, sure, but Valerie Jarrett is the REAL President of the USA.
Look into her background and SEE just how deeply linked to the Chicago machine she is, observe how her entire family is full of very real commies.
I don’t see how you can separate VJ from GayMuzzie —the fiber of TheOne is completely entwined with TehranBorn.
WERE THE ATTACKERS PAID BY IRAN?
WHAT IS THE VJ/IRAN CONNECTION..?
Was the Bengazi rescue red-lighted by an *Iranian confederate*?
Do I have to draw every body a picture of what happened in BENGHAZI? As I said, right from the beginning, THIS WAS A BLOWN “BLACK OPERATION” BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT IN COLLUTION WITH THE CIA. No body is asking why the ambassador was having lunch with a Turkish diplomat? They were running guns to the Syrian rebels, and it blew up in their faces. Why is that so difficult to understand? I really don’t care what these politicians in Washington is saying or not saying. THAT IS THE TRUTH. Why are these republicans not asking those questions? Again, very simple, they were part of the “BLOWN” operation.
It's been like a big blanket of STFU and corruption has been pulled over US like is done with a corpse, with one and a half of the parties in charge busy nailing that blanket and we, the corpse, it covers to the ground to hold everything in place.
Always carry a knife. You never know when you'll need to cut your way out from under a progressive quilt of BS, like when the elected fail their voters and the duly sworn violate their oaths.
This keeps getting posted as KNOWN FACT.
I wonder. Here is a June 17, 2013 quote by the Prime Minister of Libya:
"Asked about the involvement of the Islamist Ansar Al-Sharia militias in the recent Benghazi violence, Prime Minister Ali Zeidan said that he had no such evidence."
Link to full Libya Herald article"
Does anyone know if there is any real definitive evidence as to who was in charge of the Benghazi attack?
And Note: Since al Qaeda was the recipient of some of the smuggled weapons it is counter-intuitive to assume that an "al Qaeda offshoot" would want to interfere with that flow.
I am exceedingly tired of articles that begin with this question. Quit asking me and FIND OUT, people! It's your job, not mine, so why do you keep asking ME?
Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise.
