Skip to comments.Obama’s Treason In Benghazi
Posted on 08/09/2013 8:03:14 AM PDT by NKP_Vet
What exactly happened at the U.S. consulate and nearby CIA annex in Benghazi on September 11, 2012? We now know that dozens of CIA operatives at the CIA Annex who survived the second attack have been shuffled around the country living under assumed names, forbidden to talk to the press; forbidden to talk to Congress, and are given monthly polygraph tests to ensure that they keep their mouths shut. Despite the Obama regimes gag order on these CIA agents, the truthor at least part of the truthhas come out.
Dozens of the al-Qaeda offshoot Ansar al-Sharia stormed the consulate with AK-47s and RPGs. The so-called consulate security detail, the February 17 Martyrs Brigade, also tied to al-Qaeda, immediately melted away into the night, leaving the consulate defenseless. We would later learn that the February 17 Martyrs Brigade provided a layout of the consulate to Ansar al-Sharia, including the location of the safe house, where ambassador Chris Stevens and Communications Officer Sean Smith hid in once the consulate came under attack.
Ambassador Stevens informed the embassy in Tripoli via cell phone that they were under attack and a call for help was beamed around the world to the State Department, Department of Defense, Intelligence Communityeven the White House. In fact an email went directly to the White House Situation Room at exactly 10:05 p.m. Benghazi time, 4:05 p.m. Washington time.
(Excerpt) Read more at westernjournalism.com ...
If it comes down to subpoenas, they will throw Jarrett under the bus. The question is whether or not Obama will pardon her after she’s convicted or if she’ll squeal on the regime in exchange for immunity.
Should be interesting.
Sorry. There’s a reason “treason” is defined in the Constitution.
Do you know what the reason is?
What crime to you think Valerie Jarrett is guilty of?
” Obama refused to help Americans under attack. Barack Obama created a fantasy of a mob turned violent over an anti-Muslim YouTube video. And now Barack Hussein Obama is keeping the CIA agents that were stationed at the CIA Annex under lock and key”
All of those things are unquestionable prerogatives of the office that “Obama”, or whatever his real name is, was unfortunately elected to - twice.
You know, we have orgs. like Oath Keepers, retired CIA operatives, retired military, etc...etc...
None of them have seen fit to DO anything. None of these “muzzled” patriots have seen fit to whistel blow dispite what is being done to them.
Either there is a “bigger picture” of which they are aware and we are not, or they are keeping shut to protect their jobs. Something just doesn’t make sense.
Panetta taking orders from Jarett. Petraeus keeping quiet. We are supposed to believe everyone in this administration is either evil or gutless.....
The media is complicit. If this were under a Republican president, the media would be obsessing 24/7 and the headlines in newspapers would blast the evil fascist.
But the president is an America-hating marxist, and the media approve of his actions.
Madame Benghazi, otherwise known as Herself, the Cold and Joyless, had no small part to play in the whole spin factory that was involved in the run-up and execution of the gun-running operation to the Syrian rebels.
There was no rational excuse for the series of wrong moves and illogical responses in the whole episode, and like the much lesser circumstances that surrounded the Watergate break-in of 1972, the cover-up and the lies were much worse than the original infraction involved.
Valerie Jarrett is more or less in the same position that Alexander Haig found himself in as the inner circle in the Oval Office began to collapse around Nixon - the “person in charge” when the titular chief could not or would not act decisively.
On so many levels, the Current Occupant of the White Hut is morphing into Richard Nixon of 1973 and 1974.
And NOBODY loved Nixon when the whole façade came crashing down.
“Jarrett will be thrown under the bus” —that is a totally ridiculous statement. There are appearances that have 2b attended to, sure, but Valerie Jarrett is the REAL President of the USA.
Look into her background and SEE just how deeply linked to the Chicago machine she is, observe how her entire family is full of very real commies.
I don’t see how you can separate VJ from GayMuzzie —the fiber of TheOne is completely entwined with TehranBorn.
WERE THE ATTACKERS PAID BY IRAN?
WHAT IS THE VJ/IRAN CONNECTION..?
Was the Bengazi rescue red-lighted by an *Iranian confederate*?
Do I have to draw every body a picture of what happened in BENGHAZI? As I said, right from the beginning, THIS WAS A BLOWN “BLACK OPERATION” BY THE STATE DEPARTMENT IN COLLUTION WITH THE CIA. No body is asking why the ambassador was having lunch with a Turkish diplomat? They were running guns to the Syrian rebels, and it blew up in their faces. Why is that so difficult to understand? I really don’t care what these politicians in Washington is saying or not saying. THAT IS THE TRUTH. Why are these republicans not asking those questions? Again, very simple, they were part of the “BLOWN” operation.
“They were running guns to the Syrian rebels, and it blew up in their faces. Why is that so difficult to understand?”
Did you even read the article? From the statement above obviously not.
Aka obama was duty-bound not to leave those four Americans in the lurch. He (or his minion, Jarrett of the face of bat), actively denied their rescue attempt, which was already automatically immediately underway. An honest investigation would likely reveal that this was done to enable our enemies to succeed in capturing ambassador Stevens, either to trade him later for the Blind Sheik or to kill him outright in order to cover aka obama’s tracks in supplying weapons to our enemies elsewhere.
If that is not “adhering to [the USA’s] Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort” (treason) then I would like to know what you think it is.
By the way, this kind of treason is normally punishable by the death, but I, for one, would be perfectly satisfied to see aka obama just sentenced to only to do five to ten years of really hard time in the electric chair (I’d even allow the power to be shut off during non business hours out of deference to the greenies).
It's been like a big blanket of STFU and corruption has been pulled over US like is done with a corpse, with one and a half of the parties in charge busy nailing that blanket and we, the corpse, it covers to the ground to hold everything in place.
Always carry a knife. You never know when you'll need to cut your way out from under a progressive quilt of BS, like when the elected fail their voters and the duly sworn violate their oaths.
By what statute, rule, or superior authority?
A decision to commit forces, or withhold them, in an urban combat scenario, is completely and totally the privilege of the C-in-C. Exercise of discretionary authority is not treason, and this accusation is in fact WHY treason is defined so specifically in the US Constitution. The King, or his ministers, were constantly accusing their political enemies of treason.
It is a tragedy of nearly Biblical proportions that "Obama" was ever given any responsibility for our safety, our prosperity, or our children's future. That he was re-elected after it was clear that he is a moral coward, lazy, and has (at least) Muslim sympathies just makes it worse.
But if anyone here ever succeeded in turning a discretionary exercise of Constitutional authority into treason, there would never be an end to it.
This keeps getting posted as KNOWN FACT.
I wonder. Here is a June 17, 2013 quote by the Prime Minister of Libya:
"Asked about the involvement of the Islamist Ansar Al-Sharia militias in the recent Benghazi violence, Prime Minister Ali Zeidan said that he had no such evidence."
Does anyone know if there is any real definitive evidence as to who was in charge of the Benghazi attack?
And Note: Since al Qaeda was the recipient of some of the smuggled weapons it is counter-intuitive to assume that an "al Qaeda offshoot" would want to interfere with that flow.
It was just out earlier this week that Valerie Jarrett’s the person behind the call to stand down during Benghazi.
This was not suppose to happen. The terrorists are our friends. Signed Hillary Clinton, Barrack Obama, Withholder, Jimmy Carter. Hey morons, what terrorists. The one’s in power or the one’s seeking to take power.
I am exceedingly tired of articles that begin with this question. Quit asking me and FIND OUT, people! It's your job, not mine, so why do you keep asking ME?
Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise.
Is “treason” defined anywhere else?
The definition of treason in the Federal Constitution is intended to prevent politicians from accusing other politicians.
Tin Foil hat time. There are 2 comets coming in Oct and Nov Is-on and Encke and they are going to be coming very close to earth and I believe the government is not telling us. I am being conspiratorial, but in this time and day who knows? Maybe that is why the Congress and media is covering up all of his scandals. Who knows?
The Truth will come out—it may not sink Obama but it will kill Hillary’s chance at being president. Something smells really bad—and that means that what ever the truth is—its worse than we imaine.
I am waiting for the new VJ Day —Victory Over Jarrett!
The cover-up began as election campaign season denial that *the Hero of the Bin Laden Raid* (y’know, the one where Seal Team Six was finally allowed to go cap the mass-murdering POS in his vacation compound in Pakistan after Leon Panetta kept insisting on it for months) was actually an incompetent bungler who couldn’t make up his mind to act when the surprise attack started. BTW, it shouldn’t have been a surprise, and wouldn’t have been, if the Kenyan-born muzzie hadn’t been standing with his coreligionists in the ugly direction part of the wind.
Now he and his cadre have to keep pushing various lies (apart from the “anti-Islamic video” meme, which was ridiculous on its face, which is why the Partisan Media Shills pushed that meme for such a long time. The only thing more ridiculous is the belief by the PMS that they have any credibility) and making up new ones.
I don’t ask you, I just tell you what Admiral Lyons is saying, the most logically explanation, and its hot very “HOT”!!!
Good post. Do you remember Max Headroom, a silly TV show from the ‘80s? It was about a computer generated head that appeared on tv screens talking gibberish. Barack Hussein Barry Soetoro Obama is the 21st century Max Headroom..
I don't agree with that. If this group wasn't getting in on the arms flow there is no reason for me to believe they wouldn't pull this crap just to throw a monkey wrench in the works. Shia against Sunni. Tribal fueds. Blood fueds. Or simply just for the hell of it. Moslems are counter-intuitive troglodytes.
You may be right.
The problem is we don’t even know for sure that this is an al Qaeda offshoot. That’s been reported. Widely in fact. But the Libyan government says they have no evidence of that. And Obama is refusing to identify the attackers. Sealed documents.
Why would Obama seal the documents. My thinking: he doesn’t want us to learn the identity and affiliations of the attacking group.
You might speculate on why that would be.
Al Arabiya spent considerable time identifying protesters as primarily from the Salafi movement
Now I'm going to go searching for that quote.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.