| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
| Locked on 08/02/2013 1:04:26 PM PDT by Sidebar Moderator, reason: |
Posted on 08/02/2013 9:45:12 AM PDT by llevrok
* Fortunately this memo doesn’t categorize words like “cracker” as potentially offensive. *
It will be included in the banned words. It starts with a “C”.
Please refer to my earlier post.
-PJ
When you have to say one of the 14,000 banned Seattle words, yet to be published, you could always hum the word like Edith did when Archie banned the words “Cling Peaches”
Aren’t these LIB/Asshat politicians soooooooo over? Theiur illogical, brainless antics are tiresome. What fools.
I think that after this has come to light, mentioning the fact that someone is from Seattle will be deemed offensive.
It’s hard to take anyone seriously who is too illiterate to know the difference between ‘sorted’ and ‘sordid.’ Did Rachel Jeantel write this garbage?
Let's see if we can use these words in a sentence!
Hmmm. How about: "We're using US CITIZENS' tax money to support a whole LOT of ILLEGAL ALIEN RESIDENTS lifestyles so they never have to go back to the $hitholes that they came from."
Yeah, that works. :(
What is offensive are these city leaders wasting the tax payers’ money and time on this nonsense.
No, it does not, and never has!!
This Jerk has no idea what the hell goes on in the world so He/She/Whatever sits
in an armchair quarterbacking whatever IT needs to get attention.
Make-believe is for Kids, ass!
You're damn right that's offensive! The word "libtard" is a combination of "liberal" and "retard." You need to apologize to retards for lumping them together with liberals.
Since I find any mention of the drug-addled communist in our White House to be offensive, would this ban all mention of Obama, all written or spoken implementation of ObamaCare, and all ballots from carrying the names of anyone who supported Obama? As wonderful as that sounds, even the social parasites have the God-given human rights that they try to deny us, and I would oppose that interpretation (or any other interpretation) of this law.
It sounds apocryphal to me.
It's not apocryphal, it's just a damn lie.
I'm old enough to remember when brown paper bags were all there were. I'm also old enough to remember the (real) civil rights movement, the Selma march, Dr. King's "I have a dream" speech, etc, as it happened.
There was never any connection between brown paper bags and anyone's skin color.
Total BS.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.