Is that a rhetorical question.
Because if they haven’t yet, I don’t know when they would.
No.
Is the earth flat?
Once you admit it, the press has no further use of you. They admire liars. They gushed over how GOOD Clinton was at it.
I don't see Ubama ever admitting anything, either.
That’s like asking will Obama ever turn on Obama?
With 80-90% of the MSM left wingers?
NO.
People don't often turn on their progeny. For starters, it makes them look bad.
The MSM understands perfectly who controls the checkbook. The self-acclaimed elite wannabee MSM cannot afford to do their job with honesty, integrity, or ethics .... they sold out a long time ago ... and they are treated just like the slaves that they have become.
“Will the press ever turn on Obama…”
???
Sure, Obama turns the press on, doesn’t he?
It's nearly impossible for Marxists, secular humanists, and postmodernists to give up their world views because they are based on the results of the choice to not think, which means they are based on emotionalism and concrete bound mentality, which means that they do not have to be compatible with reality and can avoid thinking in principles of cause and effect.
To paraphrase and old saying: “Is the Pope Muslim?”
For them to turn on Obama would be like taking a whole lotta cyanide capsules. They are the bigger part of the monster and can’t turn on him without some serious self-flagellation. I don’t see it happening because of how invested they have become.
1. Weiner's initial lies in Congress WERE political. Weiner at first arrogantly accused the press of making up the story and tried to bully them into backing off. Then he claimed that his phone had been hacked, and only backed off of that when others demanded that the FBI investigate the hacking of a sitting Congressman's phone. Anyone who supported Weiner during this also supported his blaming of others, including bullying the press.
2. We need to redefine "the press" to include British and other foreign news outlets, too. Let's get the UK Telegraph, and even the Guardian to write what American outlets refuse to write. I recall press conferences from the past when a question or two was always reserved for a foreign journalist. Let's try to get the British press to write the pieces that Americans refuse to write.
-PJ
How do you turn on your paymaster?
You’ve seen what this Marxist does to his “enemies”.....
” the Obama-dike”
Okay, I’ll bite. Who is it?
I remember a few months ago reading an article about the large number of White House and campaign staffers who were married to people working for the alphabet networks; big name reporters and on air talent. I thought I had it bookmarked but now I can’t find it, even on the web. It explained how Obama had such an iron grip on the press. These people were not going to jeopardize their spouses jobs.
Well since the MSM created the myth of Obama it would be like them shooting themselves in the foot and exposing themselves as co-conspirators to the fraud.
