Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chris Christie: Rand Paul ‘dangerous’
Politico ^ | 26 Jul 2013 | HADAS GOLD

Posted on 07/26/2013 7:11:18 AM PDT by mandaladon

New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie is ripping libertarians — including Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) — for challenging government surveillance programs and failing to understand the dangers of terrorism. “This strain of libertarianism that’s going through parties right now and making big headlines I think is a very dangerous thought,” the New Jersey GOP governor said on Thursday at a Republican governors forum in Aspen, Colo. “You can name any number of people and (Paul is) one of them.”

Christie, a potential 2016 candidate who appeared on the panel with Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal, Indiana Gov. Mike Pence and Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, said lawmakers who are questioning government surveillance programs should hear from the families affected by the Sept. 11 attacks.

“These esoteric, intellectual debates — I want them to come to New Jersey and sit across from the widows and the orphans and have that conversation. And they won’t, because that’s a much tougher conversation to have,” Christie said. “The next attack that comes, that kills thousands of Americans as a result, people are going to be looking back on the people having this intellectual debate and wondering whether they put …” Christie said before trailing off. Paul’s office shot back on Friday, saying Christie may need a “new dictionary.”

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: anncoulture; chrischristie; coulture; elections; fatass; randpaul
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
To: mandaladon
"We're from the government! Trust us!"

Obama is all the reason anyone needs to possess a profound distrust of government.

41 posted on 07/26/2013 7:38:27 AM PDT by gogeo (I didn't leave the Republcan Party, it left me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

It isn’t a matter of not understanding terrorism Governor Christie, it’s a matter of government not understanding constitutional protections.


42 posted on 07/26/2013 7:38:59 AM PDT by SCHROLL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

That’d work but it’s a tad too sweet and cute for that lickspittle jackanape.


43 posted on 07/26/2013 7:40:38 AM PDT by WorkingClassFilth (You hear it here first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon
Rand is targeted because he will not compromise his constitutional stand on every issue for the "progressive abdication" mentality of the RINOs.

Seems no one is willing to accept the corrective pain that it will take to avoid the eventual death of our great county.

44 posted on 07/26/2013 7:41:25 AM PDT by Cannoneer (The purpose of power is to maintain power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frapster

Now is not the time to trust any RINO nor is 2016. It might be worth plugging your nose and being near-Libertarian in the short run. It’s catching steam everywhere. Cruz is very near-Libertarian but conservative enough to win freepers but I would caution to avoid those trying to draw lines between Cruz and Rand. At this point the mess needs cleaned up (if that’s possible) and you can’t tell me Rand would not be preferable to any existing police-state defending RINO.


45 posted on 07/26/2013 7:43:05 AM PDT by techworker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Frapster
With the recent announcement about blimps being used for constant surveillance in large cities, we're moving closer to the Fringe alternate universe.

What could go wrong?


46 posted on 07/26/2013 7:45:09 AM PDT by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: cymbeline

It’s a false dichotomy. There is no reason to believe that more buildings must be blown up to ensure our liberty.
That argument presupposes that there are no alternative solutions to the security question. It also presupposes that monitoring my text messages and phone calls enhances national security in any way. It doesn’t.
I’d be willing to try a different approach: Since the Islamists have openly stated that we are their enemy, and that they want to kill us; let’s take them at their word. Stop the PC nonsense and name our enemy. I’ll wager that if 10% of the money spent on wiretapping Americans unconstitutionally had been spent on actually destroying the ememies ability to attack us, or securing our own borders, we wouldn’t need to have a conversation on liberty vs. security at all.


47 posted on 07/26/2013 7:47:40 AM PDT by Hugh the Scot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: isthisnickcool

Crispy Kreme is the product of a RINO mating with a creme filled donut. His chances of winning the 2016 GOP nomination are slim to none. Slim just road out of town. He is seethig with envy that Rand Paul is currently running numero uno in the polls for the GOP nod.


48 posted on 07/26/2013 7:48:14 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Jim from C-Town
"Exactly! For all the money they spend on domestic spying, they could spend almost nothing by securing the border and fixing or at least implementing the VISA and E-Verify programs.

If they fixed the border and spied on our enemies, we could STOP listening in on my phone calls to my doctor!

Agree.

You should be president.

49 posted on 07/26/2013 7:50:45 AM PDT by hummingbird (THE LIBERTY AMENDMENTS by Mark Levin. He has a great plan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: techworker

Do you think Rand has a good chance of pulling his dad’s base in ‘16? I’m sure hoping so.


50 posted on 07/26/2013 7:52:18 AM PDT by txhurl ('The DOG ate my homework. That homework, too. ALL my homework. OK?' - POSHITUS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon
Christie should be commended for his work in bringing New Jersey back to economic reality. There, let the adulation for Christie as a Conservative spokesman, stop. His comments, here, show not only a total inability to see the full picture, with respect to the objectionable surveillance of American citizens; but his phraseology, in urging a one-sided approach, is unnecessarily harmful to Republican prospects. He could have stated his opinions more respectfully, to say the least.

Anyone who sees the broader picture, will recognize that whatever we do, in this area of concern, involves dangers. We have to carefully evaluate our priorities, and some of us will always insist that no decision must include a surrender of the heritage vindicated by the British surrender at Yorktown, and ratified before the World in the Treaty of Paris (1783).

Again, because I hope that we can work together, we should pay Christie deserved respect for his work on New Jersey finances. At the same time, we should demand respect back for those of us who are unwilling to sacrifice Liberty to a form of Collectivist Utilitarianism.

William Flax

51 posted on 07/26/2013 7:56:35 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cymbeline
"There’s such a thing as going too far to make ourselves secure. I don’t know exactly where to draw the line but I think our administration’s concept of adequate security takes away too much of our freedom and privacy."

Agree. Where to draw the line and who will draw the line is my question.

I don't trust a LOT of GOVERNMENT people to make this decision.

52 posted on 07/26/2013 7:57:35 AM PDT by hummingbird (THE LIBERTY AMENDMENTS by Mark Levin. He has a great plan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Starboard
“The next attack that comes, that kills thousands of Americans as a result"

Terrorists do not attack Americans by choice, they attack internationalist city slicker Democrats, people that hate America. Anything that inspires people come to their senses about living in an insect hive is at least partly good for America.

NJ has a higher population density than India, for real, and we're importing more H1B Indians every day. There are whole cities that resemble India now. This is NJ's solution to funding the retired government worker pensions, half of which now have their checks mailed to Florida.

53 posted on 07/26/2013 7:57:54 AM PDT by Reeses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Um, wasn’t there some blonde “conservative” who was all for Christie running for Prez? Who was that?


54 posted on 07/26/2013 7:59:03 AM PDT by MEGoody (You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

Will we EVER hear him talk like that about OBAMA or any DEMOCRAT or maybe BON JOVI? Doubt it....


55 posted on 07/26/2013 8:00:18 AM PDT by Blue Turtle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mandaladon

I like Rand Paul. I may not agree with him on everything but I don’t agree with anybody about everything. Christie, next time you open your pie hole fill it with pie and the nation will be better off.


56 posted on 07/26/2013 8:02:40 AM PDT by scripter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

He needs more than his dad’s base.

Many of us were waking up, I didn’t really jump on the Ron Paul thing until the primaries when he was the only one talking sense to me.

Now I am not gloating. Guys with R’s next the their name can be very persuasive and even I voted for Romney. However it’s absolutely clear to me after the Snowden incident that the establishment GOP is not to be trusted. Never again can be be Sean Hannity - Democrats bad, Republicans good, hoo-rah.

Bachmann really helped seal that deal the other night. Nobody is defending her actions.


57 posted on 07/26/2013 8:03:37 AM PDT by techworker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Hugh the Scot
"I’d be willing to try a different approach: Since the Islamists have openly stated that we are their enemy, and that they want to kill us; let’s take them at their word. Stop the PC nonsense and name our enemy. I’ll wager that if 10% of the money spent on wiretapping Americans unconstitutionally had been spent on actually destroying the enemies ability to attack us, or securing our own borders, we wouldn’t need to have a conversation on liberty vs. security at all."

Intelligent approach. So much that you must not be a government employee.

58 posted on 07/26/2013 8:07:00 AM PDT by hummingbird (THE LIBERTY AMENDMENTS by Mark Levin. He has a great plan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

Yup.


59 posted on 07/26/2013 8:08:26 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks ("Say Not the Struggle Naught Availeth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

Yup.
I’d guess 58 long sport coat


60 posted on 07/26/2013 8:08:56 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks ("Say Not the Struggle Naught Availeth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson