Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House GOP: We’ll legalize “DREAMers” if border gets secured first
Hotair ^ | 07/25/2013 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 07/25/2013 10:45:49 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last
To: ek_hornbeck

Exactly. Why is it that Mexico and her citizens are afforded border security, but we are not? Guatemala should demand an open border with Mexico...see where that goes.


41 posted on 07/25/2013 1:27:57 PM PDT by Jane Long (While Marxists continue the fundamental transformation of the USA, progressive RINOs stay silent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If the border is secured (Ha!), why would we then have an obligation to legalize those who BROKE OUR LAWS? Bob


42 posted on 07/25/2013 1:37:44 PM PDT by alstewartfan ("The atmosphere's too cold in here to attract a butterfly like that." Al Stewart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Note to House GOP, and that is why we need a second Political party to run against the one party system in place.


43 posted on 07/25/2013 1:54:46 PM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

House Republicans would be smart to ignore any legislation that has to do with a pathway to citizenship, regardless of how strong the border security language is. As sure as I’m sitting here, the pathway to citizenship will happen long before the border is actually secured.

There is no way - none - that true border security will ever happen.

Democrats want the illegals here as a source of votes.
Many Republicans want the illegals here as a source of cheap labor.

Only a small number of Republicans actually want to secure the border. Given that’s the case, this idea that we’ll get border security before any “pathway to citizenship” is theater.

Don’t fall for it.


44 posted on 07/25/2013 1:59:06 PM PDT by Personal Responsibility (Government: Slimy used car salesmen writing laws forcing you to buy their cars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I hope the Repubs pull a page out of the Dem playbook by making the Dems put up the fence first, and then ignore the request for amnesty.


45 posted on 07/25/2013 1:59:42 PM PDT by VRW Conspirator (The Lefties can drink Kool-Aid; I will drink Tea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRW Conspirator

The security will be a 10-year project and never get done but legalization will happen immediately


46 posted on 07/25/2013 2:00:54 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Personal Responsibility
Many Republicans want the illegals here as a source of cheap labor.

I guess. But how many apple pickers, maids and gardeners do we need?

47 posted on 07/25/2013 2:02:07 PM PDT by VRW Conspirator (The Lefties can drink Kool-Aid; I will drink Tea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The GOP has no intention of deporting the foreign nationals who are illegally squatting in the USA.

Without deportation you have defacto amnesty.

I won’t vote for politicians who will not enforce the law no matter which Party they belong to.


48 posted on 07/25/2013 2:03:28 PM PDT by Pelham (Deportation is the law. When it's not enforced you get California)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRW Conspirator
I guess. But how many apple pickers, maids and gardeners do we need?

Especially when our highest unemployment rate is among unskilled and semi-skilled workers.

49 posted on 07/25/2013 2:03:30 PM PDT by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Pelham

and judges won’t let us cut off benefits to illegals, which would probably get most of them to pack up and leave


50 posted on 07/25/2013 2:05:20 PM PDT by GeronL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
If they wanted to secure the border, all they would have to do is stop breaking the laws against handing out money to Illegals. Until our own Government follows the laws they write, nothing they say or do means anything anymore. Most of the Government of the United States could be and should be put in prison for breaking the law.

Hint to Congress, they are called illegal. What difference will more laws make?!


51 posted on 07/25/2013 2:05:34 PM PDT by American in Israel (A wise man's heart directs him to the right, but the foolish mans heart directs him toward the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
I DARE YOU!!


52 posted on 07/25/2013 2:07:40 PM PDT by Cheerio (Barry Hussein Soetoro-0bama=The Complete Destruction of American Capitalism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

In addition to its hypocrisy in demanding open borders with the US and closed borders with Guatemala, I always get a laugh out of Mexican government officials who accuse US immigration opponents of “racism.” In Mexico, your status in society is largely determined by how much European (as opposed to Indian) blood you have. That’s why they don’t want Indio immigrants from Guatemala, and why the Mexican elite wants to dump all of their surplus Indios and Mestizos on us.


53 posted on 07/25/2013 2:08:05 PM PDT by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: headstamp 2

Yes, call your congress critter often and thank it for supporting 4th of July gang rape of a 13 year old and the rape and murder of 93 year old grandma. Just search on the topic and you will find lots more illegal alien rapists than valedictorians. Call and thank them in your best NPR voice.
Don’t forget about the drunken illegal aliens who kill also.

Question? How many rapes and vehicular DWI homicides are allowed before they are excluded from citizenship?


54 posted on 07/25/2013 2:18:08 PM PDT by Southern by Grace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Southern by Grace
Question? How many rapes and vehicular DWI homicides are allowed before they are excluded from citizenship?

Apparently 36. You're out after your 37th!

55 posted on 07/25/2013 2:21:37 PM PDT by ek_hornbeck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There’s nothing ‘special’ about the illegal children of illegals raised here. Even if they were the legal children of diplomats or businessmen who happened to grow up here legally, they wouldn’t be due some special US citizenship—and that should apply even less for illegals!

Talk about perverse incentives!


56 posted on 07/25/2013 2:45:06 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starboard
Even if Congress puts true border security in a bill to be signed, Zero will simply not enforce such provision(s). ******** That is certainly true. Everybody understands this EXCEPT for Republican legislators.

The Republicans understand this perfectly. They want the illegals in here as much as the Democrats.

57 posted on 07/25/2013 3:08:18 PM PDT by Count of Monte Fisto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Defeat Tyranny!
Start Here!

Donate here!


58 posted on 07/25/2013 3:58:12 PM PDT by RedMDer (When immigrants cannot or will not assimilate, its really just an invasion. Throw them out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Every single Republican congressman, that utters a word in support of any type of legalization, amnesty, etc, should immediately be challenged by someone in their district.

Even if the person has not intention/chance of winning, someone should just come forward and state their intention to run against them, just for uttering those words. I’d bet that most would quickly rethink their thinking when it comes to this subject.


59 posted on 07/25/2013 4:24:59 PM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bgill

And, there’s been bills presented that the money from places like Western Union be taxed, since so much of it was cash. From what I remember, the amount of revenue from the money sent back home would be significant, but of course the lobbyists jumped in like a pack of wolves and that was it.


60 posted on 07/25/2013 4:27:27 PM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson