Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Health-care law is tied to new caps on work hours for part-timers (WaPo)
Washington Post ^ | July 23, 2013 | By Sandhya Somashekhar

Posted on 07/23/2013 9:30:51 PM PDT by Brad from Tennessee

For Kevin Pace, the president’s health-care law could have meant better health insurance. Instead, it produced a pay cut.

Like many of his colleagues, the adjunct music professor at Northern Virginia Community College had managed to assemble a hefty course load despite his official status as a part-time employee. But his employer, the state, slashed his hours this spring to avoid a Jan. 1 requirement that all full-time workers for large employers be offered health insurance. The law defines “full time” as 30 hours a week or more.

“We work so hard for so little pay,” he said. “You would think they would want to make an investment in society, pay the teachers back and give us health care.”

This month, the Obama administration delayed the employer insurance requirement until January 2015. But Virginia, like some other employers around the country that capped part-timers’ hours in anticipation of the initial deadline, has no plans to abandon its new 29-hour-a-week limit.

The impact on Pace and thousands of other workers in Virginia is an unintended consequence of the health law, which, as the most sweeping new social program in decades, is beginning to reshape aspects of American life. . .

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: 30hours; academia; bhohealthcare; democrats; layoffs; nvcc; obamacare; parttime
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last
To: ThunderSleeps
I understand why this guy's hours were cut - two reasons. One, obamacare and the rising cost. Two, he's too ignorant or indoctrinated to see it, thus not real qualified as a professor.

Wake up people - particularly you lib lurkers out there. The fault isn't your employer. They have to look at the cost of providing healthcare under obamacare vs the cost of cutting hours and taking on more employees. Unlike the government, real world businesses actually have to balance the books. They can't spend more than they are bringing in. (well, not for long anyway - cash reserves and credit have limits) So when your hours are cut, or your existing healthcare coverage is reduced, and/or the costs go up while quality/availability goes down... Don't blame the medical industry, don't blame your employer. The fault lies 100% with your 'rat representatives and President.


Brilliant post! This guy is whining about an 'investment' in society to justify him getting more money/hours. It's really all about him and what he wants. Just as with all Obama-voters.

And they will be shocked when they see the consequences of their vote - for the young, the Obamacare premium will be sky high compared to what they could get medical insurance for before. And the coverage - it is lousy. They will pay out of pocket like they never have before.

I hope they enjoy their socialism. It's not that much fun when they are the ones paying.
41 posted on 07/24/2013 4:53:24 PM PDT by yorkiemom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

Not likely, they’re the Affirmative-Action indoctrinated spawn of the boomer generation that has re-elected the same Democrats and Republicans for decades and is responsible for the idiocy that created ACA.


42 posted on 07/24/2013 5:02:30 PM PDT by wrencher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

He split the boomer vote in 08 but this last time? No it doesn’t appear to be the case, in 2012:

http://www.nationaljournal.com/columns/political-connections/election-reinforces-divide-between-millennials-baby-boomers-20121108

Nor does it explain the rise of the power of the tea party which helped in 2010 to stop zero and his goulish minions from doing more damage.

Healthcare was passed without any republicans at all. It was Boomers who beseiged Congress during the deliberations to demand it not be passed only to be taunted by the likes of Nazi P and Reed. That it was upheld by idiotic reasoning in the scotus is a continual shame.

Either way, we are stuck with a monstrosity that will ruin the health care for me and thee in this country.


43 posted on 07/25/2013 4:00:41 AM PDT by Adder (No, Mr. Franklin, we could NOT keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Adder

Blaming Generation X when it was passed in the Senate and the House by Boomers who should know better, is the height of hypocrisy. And again - 08 led to 12. Had boomers actually supported a conservative we would not have had Romney.


44 posted on 07/25/2013 8:51:59 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: JCBreckenridge

I agree.

Conservatives do not live in a vacuum. They have to appeal to masses like Reagan did. No one running had anywhere near that appeal so we ended up with Romney. Too many conservatives refused to vote for him by staying home...enough that he should have won even with the massive voter fraud in the key precincts in Pa and OH.

We should not be where we are but here we are.


45 posted on 07/25/2013 9:24:22 AM PDT by Adder (No, Mr. Franklin, we could NOT keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Adder

“Too many conservatives refused to vote for him by staying home.”

Too many liberals voted for him throwing him the nomination. I’m sorry, when we have liberals choosing our nominees for us, we are never going to win.

We have an obligation as Conservatives to vote for the conservative nominee who has a chance to win. This did not happen. We had a conservative who actually defeated Romney and what happened here? Many folks here abandoned him. Thus, Romney.


46 posted on 07/25/2013 9:51:18 AM PDT by JCBreckenridge ("we are pilgrims in an unholy land")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-46 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson