Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Court: Americans Born in Jerusalem Cannot Label 'Israel' as Birthplace
Breitbart ^ | 7/23/13 | Ben Shapiro

Posted on 07/23/2013 3:02:10 PM PDT by Nachum

On Tuesday, a unanimous three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia ruled that Americans born in Jerusalem cannot put “Israel” as place of birth on their birth certificates. Judge Karen Henderson wrote that the president “exclusively holds the power to determine whether to recognize a foreign sovereign,” and that the president had not recognized Israeli sovereignty over Jerusalem. Congress passed a law in 2002 dictating that Americans living in Jerusalem could label their children’s birthplace “Israel,” but the State Department has refused to enforce that law for over a decade.

Over 50,000 Americans have been born in Jerusalem.

The Obama administration has consistently refused to recognize Jerusalem as Israeli territory, let alone as the capital of Israel. The Democratic National Convention platform controversially removed language regarding Israeli sovereignty over Jerusalem

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Israel; News/Current Events; US: District of Columbia; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: americans; benshapiro; bho44; bhomiddleeast; born; breitbart; court; districtofcolumbia; husseinobama; jerusalem; karenhenderson; menachemzivotofsky; naturalborncitizen; ruling; separationofpowers; waronterror
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 07/23/2013 3:02:10 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jet Jaguar; NorwegianViking; ExTexasRedhead; HollyB; FromLori; EricTheRed_VocalMinority; ...

The list, Ping

Let me know if you would like to be on or off the ping list

http://www.nachumlist.com/


2 posted on 07/23/2013 3:02:40 PM PDT by Nachum (The Obama "List" at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

There is no problem, 70% of Jews will still vote for him.


3 posted on 07/23/2013 3:06:00 PM PDT by Goreknowshowtocheat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
The Obama administration has consistently refused to recognize Jerusalem as Israeli territory, let alone as the capital of Israel.

Shamefully, no U.S. administration has recognized Jerusalem as Israel's capitol. That was a decision made by Truman, and followed by Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush I, Clinton, Bush II and Obama. That is why the U.S. Embassy is, and always has been, in Tel Aviv.

4 posted on 07/23/2013 3:06:21 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

wow


5 posted on 07/23/2013 3:07:45 PM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Congress passed a law in 2002 dictating that Americans living in Jerusalem could label their children’s birthplace “Israel,” but the State Department has refused to enforce that law for over a decade.

And we have elections for what reason?
6 posted on 07/23/2013 3:09:24 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

More and more destruction of Israel and American Jews by Obama.

Worse of all, Obama is violating a 2002 law passed by Congress which states that Americans born in Jerusalem could list Israel as their place of birth.

His lawbreaking is in plain slight and nothing is being done and the courts are complicit.


7 posted on 07/23/2013 3:09:28 PM PDT by Wellington VII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

This should be no surprise coming from a man who has successfully obfuscated his own birth place.


8 posted on 07/23/2013 3:14:41 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian

“That was a decision made by Truman, and followed by Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush I, Clinton, Bush II and Obama. That is why the U.S. Embassy is, and always has been, in Tel Aviv.”

This was initially an oil decision. Since, it has been for political correctness. But, as the world becomes educated that the religion of peace isn’t the pendulum will swing the other way. The finality will be when the US is oil independent. Then, Jerusalem will be Israel’s capital and our embassy will be there.


9 posted on 07/23/2013 3:15:45 PM PDT by Gen.Blather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JLS
Congress passed a law in 2002 dictating that Americans living in Jerusalem could label their children’s birthplace “Israel,” but the State Department has refused to enforce that law for over a decade.

And we have elections for what reason?

And yet one cliche that I see periodically on this board is, "elections have consequences."

10 posted on 07/23/2013 3:15:51 PM PDT by Fiji Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

But they can change their birth sex.


11 posted on 07/23/2013 3:17:22 PM PDT by jimfree (In November 2016 my 13 y/o granddaughter will have more quality exec experience than Barack Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Disgusting, but not new.

The Bush administration said that recognition is a presidential matter, and congress has no authority to intervene. The judge who wrote it is a Bush appointee. I think this is more a division of powers dispute than an anti-Israel dispute.

Although there’s not much doubt where Obama stands on Israel.

They DO allow passports to say “Jerusalem” as the place of birth, so at least nobody is forced to say that they were born in Palestine.


12 posted on 07/23/2013 3:17:29 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Obama IS a foreign sovereign!!! ;)


13 posted on 07/23/2013 3:17:35 PM PDT by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Goreknowshowtocheat

None of the Jews I know!


14 posted on 07/23/2013 3:19:01 PM PDT by Melissa 24 (I Brake For Epiphanies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

Further proof the man hates Israel and is a Muzzie


15 posted on 07/23/2013 3:22:51 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Fiji Hill

Elections do have consequences. My comment is more in line with Levin saying we should not allow ourselves to be rules by lawyers in black robes.


16 posted on 07/23/2013 3:23:39 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JLS

The Constitution gives the President the sole power to “receive Ambassadors” (Art. II, section 3), which has always been understood to mean that the President is the only one who gets to decide what foreign countries we give diplomatic recognition to. Since 1948, it has been the unbroken policy of every U.S. Administration to recognize Israel, but not to recognize Israel’s (or anyone else’s) claim to Jerusalem. So Both the Bush and Obama Administrations have refused to follow this law.


17 posted on 07/23/2013 3:27:21 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

Ostensibly, the original reason was that the United Nations Resolution in 1947 that called for the partition of British Palestine into a Jewish and an Arab state called for Jerusalem (and Bethlehem) to be an "international" area, owned by no country and administered by the U.N. Neither Israel (which seized West Jerusalem in the 1948 war, and the rest of it in 1967), nor Jordan (which seized East Jerusalem and Bethlehem in 1948 and lost both of them in 1967), ever accepted this condition, but President Truman used it as a basis to decline to accept Israeli sovereignty over Jerusalem, and no President has ever changed that policy.

18 posted on 07/23/2013 3:30:56 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Congress and only congress can make law concerning citizenship.


19 posted on 07/23/2013 3:32:40 PM PDT by GregNH (If you can't fight, please find a good place to hide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

Un-flipping-believable.


20 posted on 07/23/2013 3:35:16 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson