Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MSNBC Analyst: Rush Limbaugh ‘Represents The Confederacy’
nationalreview.com ^ | 7/22/2013 | Dimitrios Halikias

Posted on 07/23/2013 8:18:43 AM PDT by Bon of Babble

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-216 next last
To: Bon of Babble
Prepare to be shocked

Brief bio from Columbia U.

Dorian T. Warren specializes in the study of inequality and American politics. He teaches and conducts research on labor organizing and politics, race and ethnic politics, urban politics and policy, American political development, community organizing and social movements, and social science methodology.

At one time (1948-1950 though retained position while head of NATO 1950-1953) General Eisenhower was the President of Columbia, I wonder if he is even mentioned in their history courses? I wonder if Professor Warren could even give one fact about Eisenhower?

41 posted on 07/23/2013 8:55:30 AM PDT by SES1066 (Government governs best when it governs least!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dragonblustar
If Rush represents the confederacy then MSNBC and the rest of the libtards in political office represent the Third Reich.

THAT right there. More truth in the latter than the former.

Even so, we now find ourselves in desperate need to secede from the Federal Behemoth in D.C., or it will enslave us all.

42 posted on 07/23/2013 8:55:49 AM PDT by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

What the Lincoln/Douglas debates about then? Those took place before the civil war didn’t they?


43 posted on 07/23/2013 8:56:05 AM PDT by Durus (You can avoid reality, but you cannot avoid the consequences of avoiding reality. Ayn Rand)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: RJS1950

The slavery meme was what yankees had to invoke, at the behest of their oh so righteous elitist former slave runners of Boston, who were then running in the china clipper/opium trade and importing coolie labor for the westward expansion railroad. Oh, and also slaughtering the Native Americans who got in their way and creating the reservation/plantation for them to stay on and dissolve. Nice people those oligarchs.
Horace Greeley, the yankee, paid for Jefferson Davis’s legal defense and many of his post war debts. Such was the passion against slavery. Yup. Go West young man.

It is ALWAYS “rich man’s war, poor man’s fight” Name ONE that was not when reductively analyzed to causality— including WWII one could certainly say. And the American Tories still celebrate the engineered rescue of the dregs of the english empire, as well as the inheriting of the piss poor management disasters from their former colonies. Like... Iraq, or ... Iran..or....


44 posted on 07/23/2013 8:57:29 AM PDT by John S Mosby (Sic Semper Tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Excellent post!


45 posted on 07/23/2013 8:58:21 AM PDT by sauropod (Fat Bottomed Girl: "What difference, at this point, does it make?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: struggle
Because radio was really popular during the Civil War.

Didn't Biden blame it on the TV?

46 posted on 07/23/2013 8:58:27 AM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

We think alike, you beat me with pic and bio by 95 seconds - kudos to you!


47 posted on 07/23/2013 8:58:55 AM PDT by SES1066 (Government governs best when it governs least!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Ultra Sonic 007

The war, as such, was not directly caused by slavery. It was caused by the refusal of Union states to accept secession and by the CSA’s attack on Union troops.

Secession was mostly caused by a desperate desire to defend the institution of slavery, though as with any other movement other things were mixed up with it. The point is that every one of the other issues could have been compromised.

Slavery could not be, since the South demanded federal protection for slavery in all the territories as their minimum demand, while the Republican minimum position was no expansion of slavery.


48 posted on 07/23/2013 8:59:21 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble
1): He's an MSNBC stooge.

2): He's a Columbia professor and fellow at the progressive Roosevelt Institute.

He's nowhere near the intellectual caliber of Thomas Sowell, and worth ignoring.

49 posted on 07/23/2013 8:59:35 AM PDT by windsorknot (>>>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

More proof that just b/c someone has a Ph.D. does not mean they know what they are talking about!

You’d be surprised how often that happens...


50 posted on 07/23/2013 9:00:20 AM PDT by sauropod (Fat Bottomed Girl: "What difference, at this point, does it make?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Resolute Conservative

No, it’s pretty well documented what he offered the southern states to prevent secession. What he offered them was keeping slavery which once again, they themselves stated was the reason for secession. It was about slavery from start to finish.


51 posted on 07/23/2013 9:01:16 AM PDT by RJS1950 (The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble
Warren went on to argue that Limbaugh, not the Left, obsesses over race,

projection

52 posted on 07/23/2013 9:01:35 AM PDT by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble
"MSNBC Analyst: Rush Limbaugh ‘Represents The Confederacy’"

Well, it's not true, but so f-ing what if he did? Better to represent the Confederacy than representing the Soviet Union, as does MS-LSD and Columbia University. Better to represent the Confederacy than to represent what the Obammuniusts are turning our once-great nation into.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

53 posted on 07/23/2013 9:02:25 AM PDT by wku man (Amnesty? No Way, Jose (No Se Puede!) by 10 Pound Test http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsTUQ8yOI2c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJS1950
Secession was about slavery, period.

And anyone who doubts that should read the states' declarations of secession.

54 posted on 07/23/2013 9:02:51 AM PDT by Mr Ramsbotham (Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble

Did his family own slaves? Is Rush a blood relative of Jefferson Limbaugh Davis? Does he drink mint julep from “Dixie” cups?

America wants to know.


55 posted on 07/23/2013 9:03:09 AM PDT by count-your-change (you don't have to be brilliant, not being stupid is enough)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

Sometimes Ph.D. means Piled Higher and Deeper.


56 posted on 07/23/2013 9:03:48 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Durus

I’ve read the Lincoln/Douglas debates.

Slavery was the ONLY issue discussed. Not tariffs or any of the other issues frequently brought up as the REAL reason for southern discontent.

However, it should be pointed out that Douglas was also a northerner, and was not, or claimed not to be, particularly in favor of slavery or its expansion. He was neutral on the issue, not caring whether a state or territory decided to institute slavery.


57 posted on 07/23/2013 9:04:03 AM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble
Words of Wisdumb from Dorian Warren

There's a difference between middle-class activists who speak for people, versus middle-class organizers who organize working class people. I think organizers, across class, understand the value of people demanding things for themselves.

http://www.classmatters.org/2004_04/mc_organizers_wc_communities.php

OH the RIDICULE I could heap on this posturing nincompoop!
58 posted on 07/23/2013 9:04:17 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey (Macabre Crumpet of Caucasian Ethnicity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SES1066
Wisdumb from Dorian Warren

There's a difference between middle-class activists who speak for people, versus middle-class organizers who organize working class people. I think organizers, across class, understand the value of people demanding things for themselves.

http://www.classmatters.org/2004_04/mc_organizers_wc_communities.php
59 posted on 07/23/2013 9:07:41 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey (Macabre Crumpet of Caucasian Ethnicity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Bon of Babble

LOL. Orwell would be proud. The Dems and their minions in the media have completely turned history around.

To be clear — the Confederacy was a group of Democrats who used anti-democratic, racial politics to remain in charge. And when that didn’t work, they engaged in violence and terrorism via the KKK. Sounds like not much has changed since then for the Dems.


60 posted on 07/23/2013 9:10:21 AM PDT by Opinionated Blowhard ("When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-216 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson