Skip to comments.
National Geographic gun expose instead exposes journalistic bias
Gun Rights Examiner ^
| 19 July, 2013
| David Codrea
Posted on 07/20/2013 6:38:12 PM PDT by marktwain
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
To: rockrr
I got an NG subscription a few years back, as a student of photography. Every other article was about some enviro “tragedy.”
21
posted on
07/20/2013 11:46:43 PM PDT
by
Atlas Sneezed
(Universal Background Check -> Registration -> Confiscation -> Oppression -> Extermination)
To: DirtyPigpen
Gun grabbers should be hung.They should be shot first...
22
posted on
07/21/2013 3:58:19 AM PDT
by
trebb
(Where in the the hell has my country gone?)
To: dancusa
John Stossel was the only reporter I’ve ever seen that had every one of his pieces cross examined on air by his own network, as soon as it was shown. It was the clearest indication of media group think and bias ever witnessed.
23
posted on
07/21/2013 4:45:29 AM PDT
by
SampleMan
(Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
To: marktwain
National Geographic went liberal a long time ago. Worthless magazine.
24
posted on
07/22/2013 9:22:25 AM PDT
by
aimhigh
(Guns do not kill people. Abortion kills people.)
To: DirtyPigpen
Gun grabbers should be hung.I think you meant "hanged".
25
posted on
07/22/2013 9:25:09 AM PDT
by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
To: Smokin' Joe
That is what I meant.
Thank you grammar Nazis. ;-)
26
posted on
07/22/2013 9:46:17 AM PDT
by
DirtyPigpen
(Semper Fi)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson