Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RobinMasters

Aren’t governments able to refuse a person as ambassador? I believe it has happened before.


13 posted on 07/18/2013 4:41:14 AM PDT by rfreedom4u (I have a copy of the Constitution! And I'm not afraid to use it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: rfreedom4u
Aren’t governments able to refuse a person as ambassador? I believe it has happened before.

Before a President publicly announces a nomination for Amb that must be confirmed by the Senate, the name is submitted to the host government confidentially, which must provide agreement to that nomination. Thus they have veto power over who can be the ambassador.

After an ambassador is at post, the host government can ask Washington to remove him/her for a particular reason. Almost never is it done thru the PNG process. Hume Horan our Ambassador to Saudi Arabia was removed by the former process. He was a sacrificial lamb. Horan was acting under direction from Washington to upbraid the Saudis on the importation of Chinese IRBMs without our knowledge. The WH backed away when the Saudis became upset with what the Amb said. The WH claimed that Horan was acting on his own and he was immediately reassigned from the Kingdom by Washington.

Anne Patterson is doing what Washington is directing her to do.

18 posted on 07/18/2013 5:10:23 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson