Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Could the Zimmerman Trial Be a Clever Trick To Repeal the Second Amendment (Abolish Gun Rights)

Posted on 07/17/2013 8:27:30 AM PDT by pinochet

A lawyer friend of mine suspects that the Zimmerman trial is a clever trick that has been designed by cunning liberals to strip Americans of their second amendment rights. You all remember Clinton's legalisms in 1998, saying that what happened between him and Monica Lewinsky did not meet the strict legal definition of sex.

According to my lawyer friend, it is easy for sneaky liberals to interpret the second amendment as giving Americans the right to own arms, but not the right to use them. Liberals may have figured out that going door-to-door to confiscate guns is too much trouble. You can just pass a series of laws, and interpret them in such a manner that makes the use of guns illegal. A gun will have no more usefulness than a piece of furniture. In many jurisdictions, it is illegal to fire a gun on a neighborhood, even if nobody gets hurt.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; United Kingdom; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: backdoorguncontrol; banglist; chat; democrats; guncontrol; gunrights; legalisms; liberalfascism; liberals; molonlabe; nocompromise; progressives; secondamendment; trayvon; vanity; youwillnotdisarmus; zimmerman; zimmermantrial; zimmermanverdict
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last
Hand guns are outlawed in Britain. But rifles are not. However, courts have made it illegal for a home owner to use a rifle against criminals who break into his house. In 1999, a British farmer, Tony Martin, was sentenced to 3 years in prison for defending himself from three violent criminals who had invaded his home. Mr. Martin shot one criminal dead with his shotgun. The dead criminal was a violent ex-convict, who had previously been arrested 29 times for numerous crimes, including assaulting a police officer.

Read Mr. Martin's tragic story: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Martin_%28farmer%29

1 posted on 07/17/2013 8:27:30 AM PDT by pinochet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pinochet

Liberals would love to disarm the law abiding (they know they can’t disarm the criminals) so that we become more dependent on government.


2 posted on 07/17/2013 8:32:27 AM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Inside every liberal and WOD defender is a totalitarian screaming to get out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pinochet

This was neither clever, nor tricky.

The Left will always try to take guns away. This particular situation is just today’s convenient excuse.


3 posted on 07/17/2013 8:34:53 AM PDT by Noamie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pinochet

” it is easy for sneaky liberals to interpret the second amendment as giving Americans the right to own arms”

Well, not surprisingly, Liberals would be wrong from the start.

The 2A does not GIVE any rights, It affirms rights we are given by God.

The Amendments LIMIT govt. Not the people.


4 posted on 07/17/2013 8:35:24 AM PDT by CrappieLuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pinochet
I doubt that liberals set up the trial with a plan in place to lose the case and attack the second amendment. But I wouldn't put it past them to take the outcome and use it to further their ends in any way possible.
5 posted on 07/17/2013 8:37:10 AM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pinochet

In Britain your semi auto rifle(AR 15 ) has to be set like a bolt action ,cock after every shot


6 posted on 07/17/2013 8:38:30 AM PDT by molson209
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pinochet

Men do not have the standing to abolish rights given by God.

Even if they tear up the paper and burn the shreds, the right still exists and will be exercised by me.


7 posted on 07/17/2013 8:39:53 AM PDT by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noamie
This was neither clever, nor tricky.

Exactly. The fact that Holder says we have a "Duty to retreat" says that he doesn't think we have any right to defend ourselves at all.
8 posted on 07/17/2013 8:43:08 AM PDT by cripplecreek (REMEMBER THE RIVER RAISIN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: pinochet

The Zimmerman trial was SUPPOSED to do that, but it didn’t work out according to the script

Even firing the head of the investigation, who refused to file charges, and falsifying affidavits to skip the grand jury, Obam and holder spending $5million for ‘protests’, and hiding evidence from the defense didn’t work


9 posted on 07/17/2013 8:45:39 AM PDT by Mr. K (There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pinochet

The Newtown school shooting was a much better opportunity, and not even that worked.

They will never stop seizing ANY opportunity, but I think this was a bad one. It’s all about race, not guns, and I think for the most part it has backfired on them. It stirred up the usual race baiters and Occupiers, but they don’t need stirring up anyway.


10 posted on 07/17/2013 8:46:38 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pinochet

Not clever, but repeal 2nd yes.


11 posted on 07/17/2013 8:46:55 AM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pinochet

IIRC, the People’s Democratic Republic of Massachusetts has a law specifically stating that everybody has a “duty to retreat” and surrender their property to an intruder. Only if they can no longer retreat can residents of that state use lethal force to defend themselves.


12 posted on 07/17/2013 8:47:30 AM PDT by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pinochet
Trick? Yes! Clever? No. Nor Unique

and even Jesse Jackson knows where the core of the CRIME problem is!




This Message Not Approved by the NSA

13 posted on 07/17/2013 8:47:52 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pinochet
Repeal of the 2nd will result in a civil war so great that there will be no Washington DC. It will be a level patch of crushed cement. My advice to those nitwits trying to repeal duck, your butt will be body bag material.
14 posted on 07/17/2013 8:48:16 AM PDT by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor

What really sucks of that the NRA didn’t bother coming to GZ’s defense, and being so narrow sighted didn’t see the gun grabbing coming down the line.

I’m still disgusted over their love affair with Harry Reid.


15 posted on 07/17/2013 8:48:31 AM PDT by DrewsMum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pinochet

You need to go back to you Doctor and have your meds’ dosage checked.


16 posted on 07/17/2013 8:50:47 AM PDT by harpu ( "...it's better to be hated for who you are than loved for someone you're not!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pinochet

I don’t think they have the ability to repeal the 2A, but they never let a good crisis go to waste.


17 posted on 07/17/2013 8:51:36 AM PDT by Sender (It's never too late to be what you might have been.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pinochet

It's obvious from the beginning that this was one of Ubama's "under the radar" gun control initiatives, as evidence byt the DOJ sending community agitators to Sanford to soften things up.

18 posted on 07/17/2013 8:53:32 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Who knew that one day professional wrestling would be less fake than professional journalism?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pinochet

I don’t think the trial was aimed at the second amendment, but I believe the Justice Department is currently trying to figure out how to make defending yourself with a gun and civil rights violation. I believe they are probably going to try to get a ruling that will elevate the use of a firearm to a very high level of force. I think they want to make people scared to use a gun to defend themselves.


19 posted on 07/17/2013 8:54:51 AM PDT by Yogafist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Noamie
Hi.

The Left will always try to take [our] guns away. This particular situation is just today’s convenient excuse.

Please allow my edit.

5.56mm

20 posted on 07/17/2013 8:54:54 AM PDT by M Kehoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-64 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson