Posted on 07/15/2013 5:12:50 PM PDT by kristinn
BTW, Rachel asserts that she aint gettin nuthing money wise from no one except Ma and Pa.
RIGHT.....
She is eating up the stardom and the short lived cash.
The juror confused Mr Donnelly with Dr DeMaio.
ADMIN MODERATOR?
Bookmark
Did NOT buy her BS.
I am keyboard challenged.
She manipulated him.
Crazy women or even ‘sane’ criminal women can make men do criminal things. Yes, he was heading full-on thug, but she pushed him that night.
If TM and GZ hadn’t intersected that night, it would have been the next night. Or the night after.
Trayvon had a monkey on his back, and Rachel took total advantage of that to extend her criminal operation.
ADMIN MODERATOR?
Anderson asked the questions Eric Holder wanted him to ask.. Holder’s looking for fodder for the Civil Trial. I could see Anderson was coached prior to this interview, just as the entire prosecution (including ‘Angela Davis’ Corey) was coached and given marching orders by Krew King 0bama.
Married to a Lawyer according to a post I read elsewhere.
I saw this interview and agreed with what she said. She did a good job. The Twitterbots have proclaimed her ignorant. They can’t believe she was at the trial and found him not guilty; the irony being they probably didn’t even see the whole trial and derived their conclusions from the biased panels and spin from the media. They say people like her are reasons there are problems in America. She’s a racist, and racists like her shouldn’t be on juries. I suppose juries for trials must be chosen based on the preformed media conviction to a case now. The low info crowd believes they are the smart ones, and when ignorant folks have proclaimed themselves wise, what can be done? They prejudged this case and made it into a huge racial incident. When the facts come out and show that wasn’t so, they stay on course. That’s liberalism, emotion rather than thought.
Wholesale was about $50 per pound in 1968. What's it going for now, I wonder? Where'd Trayvon get the dough?
It should eventually appear on this thread
Indeed! Do you remember the “geniuses” that declared OJ not guilty? Some couldn’t put a coherent sentence together to save their lives but were all hailed as heroes.
Bookmarking
Good response NT (funny about being blonde)...I can’t add much to it other than to say that some people are hooked on a thought process that women are stupid, emotional, weak, etc., and this jury proves they could get the job done and done right. I am grateful for them.
We have a problem in this country with the GROUP of liberals, which is made up of men, women, blacks,whites. This is the only GROUP we should fight; otherwise we are all individuals, some strong some weak, men included.
He can’t be retried. Period. For any reason.
>> the GROUP of liberals, which is made up of men, women, blacks,whites. This is the only GROUP we should fight
Dead on.
Wasn’t able to watch.......but just curious. Was the juror asked if they were curious that there was no mention of TM’s activities during testimony, did they read the toxicology report, is she now aware if the texts on his cellphone and would it gave been important?
I wasn’t watching either. Don’t recall any mention of her saying anything about the disallowed or unpresented evidence.
But he might have to go through some thrumped up charges of violating Martin’s “civil rights”, or a “wrongful death” civil charge brought by the parents. To me this is still double jeopardy and is against the Constitution. I despised OJ Simpson and thought he was guilty, but after the jury verdict I didn’t think it was right that he was tried for “wrongful death”, and of course lost. Just have always thought that civil suits are BS, just something to make lawyers rich.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.