Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fla. mom gets 20 years for firing warning shots
CBS ^ | 7/14/13 | CBS

Posted on 07/14/2013 3:12:12 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda

Fla. mom gets 20 years for firing warning shots

CBS News) JACKSONVILLE, Fla. - A Florida woman who fired warning shots against her allegedly abusive husband has been sentenced to 20 years in prison.

Marissa Alexander of Jacksonville had said the state's "Stand Your Ground" law should apply to her because she was defending herself against her allegedly abusive husband when she fired warning shots inside her home in August 2010. She told police it was to escape a brutal beating by her husband, against whom she had already taken out a protective order.

CBS Affiliate WETV reports that Circuit Court Judge James Daniel handed down the sentence Friday.

Under Florida's mandatory minimum sentencing requirements Alexander could receive a lesser sentence, even though she has never been in trouble with the law before. Judge Daniel said the law did not allow for extenuating or mitigating circumstances to reduce the sentence below the 20-year minimum.

"I really was crying in there," Marissa's 11-year-old daughter told WETV. "I didn't want to cry in court, but I just really feel hurt. I don't think this should have been happening."

(Excerpt) Read more at cbsnews.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: banglist; blackkk; florida; georgezimmerman; guns; selfdefense; trayvonmartin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last
Is this for real? Some lib brought this up on Twitter in their arguments over Zimmerman. This can't be the whole story, 20 years? Nobody shot, nobody killed, order of protection, no criminal record...20 years? What?

This one says she fired a warning shot - one - into a wall

http://www.presstv.ir/usdetail/313726.html

1 posted on 07/14/2013 3:12:12 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

She could have shot him and only done 10 for manslaughter.


2 posted on 07/14/2013 3:13:50 PM PDT by driftdiver (I could eat it raw, but why do that when I have a fire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

Sounds like she had a really crappy lawyer.


3 posted on 07/14/2013 3:14:48 PM PDT by Blood of Tyrants (Inside every liberal and WOD defender is a totalitarian screaming to get out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

There has to be more to this story. Was there a jury trial or just the judge?


4 posted on 07/14/2013 3:17:14 PM PDT by Figment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

Here is the FULL STORY:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/89763383/States-Motion-in-Opposition-of-Defendants-Motion-for-Immunity


5 posted on 07/14/2013 3:17:19 PM PDT by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda
Is this for real? Some lib brought this up on Twitter in their arguments over Zimmerman. This can't be the whole story, 20 years? Nobody shot, nobody killed, order of protection, no criminal record...20 years? What?

Warning shots are reckless and endanger innocent people, and should never be fired. If a person truly believes they are in jeopardy of being killed or suffering serious bodily injury, they should fire at their attacker. By not firing at the attacker, you raise doubt that you actually felt yourself to be in such jeopardy.

That being said, I suspect there is more to the story. Isn't that how lib examples operate? They tell 1/10th of the story? Little boy....skipping home from the store with Skittles....

6 posted on 07/14/2013 3:17:27 PM PDT by 101stAirborneVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda; driftdiver
Husbaned says it was her violent nature
7 posted on 07/14/2013 3:17:58 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda
a gun is deadly force, if she was in fear for her life, she should have shot him...
8 posted on 07/14/2013 3:18:09 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Or the story is leaving out some important facts. (Don’t know if it is, but it’s not an uncommon event.)


9 posted on 07/14/2013 3:18:53 PM PDT by Slings and Arrows (You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

Or, it sounds like the press is not telling the truth AGAIN.


10 posted on 07/14/2013 3:18:56 PM PDT by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

Fla is one effed up place.


11 posted on 07/14/2013 3:19:21 PM PDT by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear the unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants; Figment; Slings and Arrows

See my post above with the full complaint.

The press is lying again.


12 posted on 07/14/2013 3:20:01 PM PDT by bolobaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda
This may be another media fraud to portray someone as innocent when in fact she engaged in thuggish behavior. Going to the page at the link there is a suggestion that she was at HIS home, not HERS. And if she had put a restraining order on him, she could not turn around and claim he was violating it. Plus, one poster had this:

"1-She left the house to get a gun out of her car and went back into the house to shoot.

2-You can't leave a situation, come back, and then claim stand your ground. She had several options of retreat and chose not to use them so her claims of being in danger don't stand. Your duty is to retreat first and only use deadly force if you can't retreat.

3-There are no warning shots. In most states it is illegal to discharge a firearm even as a warning. If you feel a warning shot is warranted than no shot is warranted.

13 posted on 07/14/2013 3:20:32 PM PDT by Enterprise ("Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities." Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bolobaby

Yep. Let’s not take the press statements as facts just yet. Haven’t we learned our lesson yet?


14 posted on 07/14/2013 3:20:55 PM PDT by keats5 (Not all of us are hypnotized.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

The wife is w***e and the husband is b***k?


15 posted on 07/14/2013 3:21:02 PM PDT by Darteaus94025
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda
Its so funny and pathetic all at the same time to see how utterly childish the libtards act when they don't get their way. Unfortunately they ruin lives with their zealotry.
16 posted on 07/14/2013 3:21:19 PM PDT by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

If this is true then one would have to be very stupid to live in Florida. The entire community should be RIOTING over this verdict.


17 posted on 07/14/2013 3:21:27 PM PDT by Wanderer99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

It pretty much is the whole story. I agree with the judge that “Stand Your Ground Law” does not apply. I do have problems with the prosecutor (Corey again) levying a charge of “aggravated assault with a deadly weapon” for trial when they were willing to offer a plea for a lesser charge.


18 posted on 07/14/2013 3:22:47 PM PDT by lastchance ("Nisi credideritis, non intelligetis" St. Augustine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bolobaby

That makes more sense.


19 posted on 07/14/2013 3:23:10 PM PDT by mylife (Ted Cruz understands the law, and he does not fear the unlawful.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda; xzins

Florida is one one really screwed up state.

I’m betting the jury thought she’d get 20 days plus a small fine.

Keeping the possible sentence from a jury before they determine guilt is insanity. The penalty is something a jury should know before determining whether or not to convict.

I was booted from jury duty when I told a judge that I would NOT follow his instructions if I had any idea that doing so might result in a miscarriage of justice.

I gave a couple of examples like this. They thanked me for coming and said I was excused.

Remember this case the next time you need to get out of jury duty.


20 posted on 07/14/2013 3:23:15 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-84 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson