Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Happened to Congress’ ‘Fast and Furious’ Fury?
Pajamas Media ^ | 07/12/2013 | Bill Straub

Posted on 07/12/2013 10:33:08 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

WASHINGTON – The controversy surrounding the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives’ infamous Fast and Furious program has faded over the past few months but it’s unlikely to be relegated to the background for very long.

Last week it was revealed that a high-powered rifle employed in the unsuccessful gun-tracking program was used to kill a police chief and his bodyguard in the Mexican state of Jalisco, signaling that some of the weapons used in the enterprise are now in the possession of members of drug cartels – the same people Fast and Furious was supposed to entrap as a result of the operation.

Meanwhile, the House Committee on Oversight & Government Reform, the panel that led the investigation into the brewing scandal, continues its efforts to gain access to documents in the possession of the Department of Justice. The House in June 2012 held Attorney General Eric Holder in contempt for failing to comply with the panel’s request.

President Obama, for the first time in his administration, invoked executive privilege to thwart the committee’s demand. Justice Department officials insist they had no knowledge of the operation.

Any future congressional action on Fast and Furious, which first came to light in January 2011, likely depends on the committee and its chairman, Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), gaining access to the withheld information. Ultimately the issue will be resolved in federal court.

Issa said the House remains “steadfast in its commitment to getting the full truth about this reckless gunwalking effort that has been linked to murders on both sides of our border with Mexico.”

The House actually issued two resolutions in June 2012, holding Holder in criminal contempt of Congress while also holding him in civil contempt, a move that provided the lower chamber with the authority to sue to gain access to the documents in dispute.

Ronald Machen, the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia who technically works for Holder, rejected the House request to pursue criminal sanctions. But the lawsuit seeking access to the documents is alive and well before U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson, an Obama appointee who nonetheless has expressed skepticism over the administration’s motion to dismiss the action based on the claim of executive privilege and the assertion that the courts should stay out of a dispute between the executive and legislative branches.

Attorney Kerry Kircher, representing the House of Representatives, told the court during an April 24 hearing that presidents would essentially have carte blanche to withhold documents from Congress and frustrate legislative oversight of federal agencies if the judiciary failed to intervene. Attorney Ian Gershengorn, representing the Justice Department, argued that the courts would appear to be “a tool of the political process” if it got involved.

Jackson noted the two sides have proved unable to reach a settlement after months of negotiations, leading her to surmise that a third party, like the courts, might prove beneficial to resolving the issue.

Jackson has yet to issue a ruling and the case remains open. If the House Oversight & Government Reform Committee’s effort proves successful, the panel can get its hands on documents it considers vital to the investigation of the operation and return the issue to public consciousness. Basically, the panel wants to know what the Justice Department knew about the operation and when did it know it.

On Feb. 2, 2012, the Justice Department sent a letter to Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), ranking member on the Senate Judiciary Committee, denying the existence of any gunwalking program. The letter was rescinded 10 months later when it proved to be inaccurate. House investigators hope the contested documents, should they be made public, will shed light on the department’s degree of knowledge.

The federal courts have taken a dim view of executive privilege in recent years. The U.S. Supreme Court has held that the assertion is invalid if a suspicion of governmental wrongdoing is involved. Five years ago, during the last year of President George W. Bush’s administration, a similar executive privilege claim aimed at blocking the testimony of several senior White House officials before the House Judiciary Committee regarding the firing of nine U.S. attorneys, reportedly for political reasons, was rejected by U.S. District Judge John Bates.

“Fast and Furious” was a gunwalking operation conducted by the ATF in Arizona from 2006 to 2011. Basically, the agency abandoned its practice of immediately confiscating illegally purchased arms and instead allowed licensed firearms dealers in the Tucson and Phoenix areas to sell weapons to illegal straw buyers – middle men who purchase guns in behalf of those prohibited from doing so themselves.

The ATF hoped that by permitting these purchases agents could track the firearms that were provided to the cartels, resulting in the arrest of high-level drug kingpins. The agency monitored about 2,000 straw sales but only slightly more than 700 were recovered. Agents lost track of about 1,400 weapons. No high-level cartel figure has been arrested.

Guns purchased under “Fast and Furious” have been found on both sides of the border separating the U.S. and Mexico. On Dec. 14, 2010, U.S. Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry was killed during a firefight while on patrol near the border. Two AK-47s found at the scene were linked to Fast and Furious. The operation, which drew criticism from several agents and gun dealers while it was active, was made public shortly thereafter.

One estimate places the number of Mexican citizens killed by Fast and Furious guns at 300.

On Jan. 29, according to a report in the Los Angeles Times, one of the guns was located at the scene of a shooting that led to the death of Luis Lucio Rosales Astorga, the police chief in the city of Hostotipaquillo. Gunmen intercepted his patrol car and opened fire. A bodyguard was also killed. Astorga’s wife and a second bodyguard were wounded.

A semi-automatic WASR rifle, the firearm that killed the chief, was traced back to the Lone Wolf Trading Company, a gun store in Glendale, AZ, according to the Times. It was purchased on Feb. 22, 2010, about three months into the Fast and Furious operation, by 26-year-old Jacob A. Montelongo of Phoenix. He later pleaded guilty to conspiracy, making false statements and smuggling goods from the United States and was sentenced to 41 months in prison.

Court records show Montelongo personally obtained at least 109 firearms during Fast and Furious.

Issa’s committee isn’t the only organization seeking documents. Judicial Watch, a conservative foundation that promotes transparency in government, has filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit seeking access to the Fast and Furious records being withheld from Congress.

Justice refused to comply and has asked the court to stay proceedings while it deals with the committee’s civil contempt claim. Judicial Watch opposed the motion and is asking the court to address the issue.

“Getting beyond the Obama administration’s smokescreen, this lawsuit is about a very simple principle: the public’s right to know the full truth about an egregious political scandal that led to the death of at least one American and countless others in Mexico,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “The American people are sick and tired of the Obama administration trying to rewrite FOIA law to protect this president and his appointees. Americans want answers about Fast and Furious killings and lies.”


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; Mexico; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2deadfeds; 300deadmexicans; atf; banglist; brianterry; dea; dhs; doj; fastandfurious; fbi; gunrunner; gunrunning; gunwalker; holder; hsi; jaimezapata; mexico; obama; terry; zapata

1 posted on 07/12/2013 10:33:08 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

In a bunker huddling with Karl Rove trying to figure out some way to sneak by an amnesty bill without reaping the whirlwind.


2 posted on 07/12/2013 10:33:53 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It was bluster as usual.


3 posted on 07/12/2013 10:42:29 AM PDT by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to thoe tumbril wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Issa is a eunich, that’s why.


4 posted on 07/12/2013 10:43:01 AM PDT by Finatic (I ran out of change and have given up on hope. FUBO, I am so sick of your sorry a$$ you effin punk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; holdonnow
What Happened to Congress’ ‘Fast and Furious’ Fury?

They didn't mean it, of course.

Look, most Americans who are interested in politics have a "Blue-Red" model or a "D vs. R" model for thinking about things.

That's not a valid model.

The correct model is "People and States vs. National government".

There are probably some things about Obama the Congressional GOP doesn't like. Well, maybe. But there's one big thing they DO like, and that is their belief that he can finally put an end to the pretentions of the human cattle back in the districts that they have any right of self-rule.

This idea - the the People rule themselves and that we have retained rights, and that the Congress, Federal Courts, and Executive Branch are LIMITED IN POWER - this is anathema to evey single Member of Congress, Supreme Court Justice, and to all Presidents.

It's taken 100 years for them to be completely detached from the limits we placed on them in 1788, Barack Obama and his crowd are the agents of that final, fundamental transformation, and, by God, they are not looking back because the armies of socialism only march in one direction.

Why doesn't the Congressional GOP "do something"? Because they are the farmers and we are the cows, and they like that just fine. The disputes are over details.

5 posted on 07/12/2013 10:43:49 AM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Fast and Furious, like Benghazi and all the other numerous scandals odumbo is part of have been orchestrated to disapear. When you have no mention of it in the media, people forget about them and hence, my point. I believe nothing will ever come of Fast and Furious nor will the other scandals be addressed. Odumbo and company has skated away into the fog of absent mindedness on the part of the American people.


6 posted on 07/12/2013 10:48:21 AM PDT by DaveA37 (I'm for SMALLER , HONEST government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
"It's taken 100 years for them to be completely detached from the limits we placed on them in 1788..."

And it's almost time to put those limits back - the hard way....

7 posted on 07/12/2013 10:50:47 AM PDT by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
But the lawsuit seeking access to the documents is alive and well before U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson, an Obama appointee who nonetheless has expressed skepticism over the administration’s motion to dismiss the action based on the claim of executive privilege and the assertion that the courts should stay out of a dispute between the executive and legislative branches.

Attorney Kerry Kircher, representing the House of Representatives, told the court during an April 24 hearing that presidents would essentially have carte blanche to withhold documents from Congress and frustrate legislative oversight of federal agencies if the judiciary failed to intervene. Attorney Ian Gershengorn, representing the Justice Department, argued that the courts would appear to be “a tool of the political process” if it got involved.

...

Jackson has yet to issue a ruling and the case remains open.

Why is that taking so long? It has been about a year and a half before her court.

8 posted on 07/12/2013 10:51:56 AM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" is more than an Army Ranger credo it's the character of America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Obama threatened them.

He warned congress if they keep trying to embarrass him with accusations of scandals he won’t approve their upcoming amnesty bill.


9 posted on 07/12/2013 11:06:52 AM PDT by Iron Munro (The past is a foreign country; they do things differently there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

10 posted on 07/12/2013 11:10:22 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

We are being sold a bill of goods y’all.


11 posted on 07/12/2013 11:28:08 AM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

They’re Furious they were revealed so Fast....


12 posted on 07/12/2013 11:33:51 AM PDT by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Obama equals Osama))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

F&F? That was a long time ago. Just as AP, IRS, NSA, and Benghazi are. Keep up with the times. Today’s issue is how implement Obama’s Amnesty Agenda. That’s where it’s at. You need to get on board with the R team for the big win and stop chirping about these distractions. /sarc infinity


13 posted on 07/12/2013 12:07:10 PM PDT by Ray76 (Do you reject Obama? And all his works? And all his empty promises?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Remove the criminal!

Free Republic stands for God and Country!!
Stand with Free Republic.

14 posted on 07/12/2013 12:47:45 PM PDT by RedMDer (When immigrants cannot or will not assimilate, its really just an invasion. Throw them out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

NOBODY IN CONGRESS GIVES A DAMN ABOUT F&F


15 posted on 07/12/2013 12:52:16 PM PDT by Roccus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
What Happened to Congress’ ‘Fast and Furious’ Fury?

Money changed hands, palms were greased and the seas were calmed.........that's how the mob resolves issues.............

16 posted on 07/12/2013 1:27:33 PM PDT by varon (Down with tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: varon

WTF TV. Jury is asking question.


17 posted on 07/12/2013 1:35:02 PM PDT by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Please...

allow me to clarify...

dems are communists under a different name...

pubs are socialists under a different name...

the difference????

how they have fooled you into believeing the sh&t they shovel....

if you vote for a dem, you are a communist...

if you vote for a pub, you are a nanny state socialist..

geeeee.... where do we go next???

anywhere but mainstream..

if you disagree with me you are either a..

communist.....

socialist...

or uneducated...

let me know who or what yo are..

i will gladly put your brainwashed opinion into place..

but, i am not a socialist conservative, liberal communist, or anything inbetween..

i am a patriot..

i DEMAND you to prove me otherwise..

eagerly awaiting your response..

joe fonebone


18 posted on 07/12/2013 2:14:35 PM PDT by joe fonebone (The clueless... they walk among us, and they vote...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Stalled like every other Issa inquiry. The man must be seriously constipated because he cannot get off the pot!


19 posted on 07/12/2013 9:07:18 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Unindicted Co-conspirators: The Mainstream Media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
When I think about the GOP run House of Representatives, closely following "stupid", the word that comes to mind is "cowardice".

And Reince Priebus wonders why fewer people are willing to call themselves Republicans. Doh!

20 posted on 07/13/2013 5:19:13 AM PDT by Jabba the Nutt (The Stupid Party, they've earned it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson